Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,654
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on May 28, 2017 19:53:29 GMT
First of all, I would like to thank @falshung for his very fine posts of early Bosnia & Herzegovina issues. Falschung's posts have inspired me to dig these stamps out of my stockbooks of material that I don't know what to do with! These stamps originally were part of my father's collection, which he turned over to me about 20 years ago. For some time, I have wondered about these defaced specimens, and how they came to be this way. I did a little internet research and I found an article published and re-published in 2005 titled "Bosnia's Punched Hole Mystery" (link below), which talks about the possible reasons behind these defaced stamps. www.angelfire.com/pr/perfinsoc/abstracts/3858.pdfAt that time, it was hypothesized that this might have been done for various possible reasons: demonetization, telegraph usage, perfins, pre-cancels, printer's waste, archival punched, political protest, remainders, and souvenirs. The article concludes with its "best guess" scenario that in 1912, the leftover stamps from the pictorial issue were defaced at the printing office in Vienna and then sold in bulk to stamp dealers for use in the packet trade. Personally, these examples in my own collection are the only ones I have ever seen, and I have been curious about them for a long time, as there is nothing about them in the Scott Classic Specialized Catalogue. If anyone on TSF knows more about these stamps, or if there has been something more recently published than the 2005 article I found, I would love to see it.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,654
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on May 30, 2017 20:02:53 GMT
Many thanks to @falshung, who sent me a PM about these defaced 1906 issues. He has agreed that I could create a follow-up post with that info:
...on the Bosnia I have a contact who specializes in these. His comments are; 1. They are most probably remainders and not proofs given the quantity and perforations. 2. They were first obliterated with crayon marks. 3. As the marks were not indelible, they were punched subsequently. To justify this, he has stamps with only holes but none that have only crayon markings. 4. He went on to mention that although he has seen many of the 1906 series, he has not encountered others.
|
|