|
Post by jamesw on Oct 6, 2013 3:47:34 GMT
Part of my ongoing search for Canadian War Tax material, picked this up today at an estate auction. Sent from Field Post Office 6, June 19, 1915, opened by base censor. 2¢ Admiral and 1¢ Admiral War Tax added in Toronto with Canadian National Exhibition event cancel. Back canceled in Rosemont Ont. July 6 1915. Letter inside.
|
|
I.L.S.
Departed
Rest in Peace
I am in Clearfield, Pa. I love US Classic covers!
Posts: 2,113
|
Post by I.L.S. on Oct 6, 2013 10:33:21 GMT
So was the Canadian War Tax stamp used to tax mail to help pay for the war or could it be used as postage by itself? I am not at all familiar with the War Tax stamps.
|
|
|
Post by stampgeezer on Oct 6, 2013 18:04:01 GMT
I believe that Canadian war tax stamps use was required between 1915 - 1916 and the 1 cent per letter was used to help pay for war costs. They were not supposed to be used as postage, but some did go through as that.
|
|
|
Post by jamesw on Oct 6, 2013 18:55:35 GMT
Sorry for the delay responding. Yes, stampgeezer is right. The Special War Revenue Act of 1915 imposed a 1¢ tax on all letters and postcards mailed in Canada in the hopes of raising $8 million to help pay for Canada's war effort. The one and two cent Admirals were modified with the words WAR TAX and were for this purpose. But the public and even many postmasters were confused as to their usage. The Post Office sent out numerous missives to the PMs but they were badly worded and somewhat vague. So many stamps got through strictly as postage. Early in 1916 new stamps with the 2¢ postal rate plus the additional 1¢ tax were issued to make it easier. The cover above shows the earlier 1¢ tax plus the 2¢ drop rate. Below is a 1917 cover with the single 2 + 1¢ stamp. Also below that is a 1915 cover with a single 1¢ WAR TAX stamp. This second cover would in fact have been underpaid, since the tax is covered but not the postage. I guess it should be noted that the two covers here, with the proper postage, are soldiers mail. Once these to letters arrived from over seas, from Field Post Offices, the extra postage and tax were added in Montreal and Toronto,respectively, by people who obviously knew what the rate was. There was also confusion with a different series of overprinted War Tax. The PO took 5, 20 and 50¢ admirals and over printed the words WAR TAX and INLAND REVENUE WAR TAX in black (5¢, 20¢) or red (50¢). These were especially confusing. They were to be only used as revenue on larger items such as wine, perfume, medicine or larger documents. But again, postmasters were poorly informed and some ended up as postage. There were also specifically designed War Tax revenue stamps, for documents, cheques etc, as well as the wine strips, which I posted on another thread.
|
|
|
Post by stampgeezer on Oct 6, 2013 19:19:19 GMT
jamesw, one thing confuses me, if the tax stamps were added to the letters after they arrived in Canada from overseas, who actually paid for the tax stamp? The recipient?
|
|
|
Post by jamesw on Oct 6, 2013 20:42:41 GMT
Good question. I had posted the YMCA cover on SCF and posed the question about why there were stamps over top of the FPO and censor tape. There were a number of responses and a good discussion. One member posted a link and an excerpt from Postalhistorycorner.ca, who said this, "Postage was not required on mail from Canadian soldiers in England and France. Until July 28, 1917, however, Canadian Exchange Offices for overseas soldiers' mail affixed Canadian postage stamps on stampless mail received from soldiers overseas. The stamps were not paid by the sender or the addressee." So still somewhat of a mystery, and will need some research in day/weeks/months to come. Will be looking up Canadian Exchange Offices and their purpose. the postal history site is postalhistorycorner.blogspot.ca/2011/05/george-v-admiral-period-ww-i-military.html
|
|
|
Post by stampgeezer on Oct 6, 2013 22:34:06 GMT
jamesw, that is an excellent reference site and I have bookmarked it. As far as the stamps added to the servicemen's mail from overseas, it seems strange. Why bother? If you find the answer, post it to this thread, and I will do the same. Thanks, Theron.
|
|
|
Post by jamesw on Oct 20, 2013 17:13:17 GMT
A couple of additions to this thread. Another military cover with wartax added after the fact, and a postcard which was returned to sender for lack of a War Tax stamp. Another 1¢ admiral was added, though not a war tax stamp.
|
|
|
Post by jamesw on Jan 14, 2014 3:56:13 GMT
Here are a couple more, though admittedly not soldier's mail. A gentleman at my club keeps hunting down war tax covers for me. These are two of the latest. The first is pretty ordinary, in fact a little tattered, but it has a nice 1916 Montreal cancel. The second is far more interesting. The postmark is Vineland Station (not far from where I grew up, but that's not what makes it interesting) on April 20, 1915 - 5 days after the 1¢ War Tax Admiral was issued. Also, he appears on the cover with his dad, HRH King Edward VII in the form of a 1905 U16 Die II postal stationary envelope. Has a killer grill killer as well. Both covers are proper war tax usage.
|
|
therealwesty
Member
Inactive
Sorting my Small Queens
Posts: 331
|
Post by therealwesty on Jan 14, 2014 22:47:06 GMT
Nice covers James, the proper use of the war tax stamps is particularly hard to find! I am sure the confusion among the postmasters in their time of use has something to do with that. And I agree, the Edward VII PSE with a George V stamp on it is pretty cool.
|
|
I.L.S.
Departed
Rest in Peace
I am in Clearfield, Pa. I love US Classic covers!
Posts: 2,113
|
Post by I.L.S. on Jan 14, 2014 23:05:46 GMT
Wow I love these James! I bet you have an outstanding Canadian cover collection!
|
|