|
Post by jimwentzell on Aug 21, 2018 17:57:40 GMT
I am guessing this is a postal stationery cut-out pasted to a 1932 New Zealand cover.....or am I missing something?Wasn't it forbidden to use cut-out postal cards or other postal stationery on mail? Are my eyes playing tricks on me or did someone use pinking shears (zig-zag cutting noticed on the six pence Queen Victoria "stamp". which is definitely canceled with a Mapua, NZ Mar 21 (19)32 circular date stamp like the other stamps on the cover. I am intrigued, was the sender trying to save a few pennies by using an older "stamp" or cut-out? My favorite cover seller listed this and it expires within the hour. It is up to US$35 but that's a bit too pricey for me. Maybe if the QV stamp/image was not damaged on the right side....... What is your opinion??? Should I have bid more?
What would you bid, if you collected this type cover?--Jim Wentzell stampguyaps177-681
|
|
|
Post by jimwentzell on Aug 21, 2018 19:22:05 GMT
The cover above closed at $33. About twice what I would pay, but that's just me!
|
|
|
Post by sherro on Aug 22, 2018 2:10:27 GMT
It's a stamp. It's not in date, but that's genuine usage, albeit philatelic. All pre-decimal NZ stamps were valid for postage until a few years after decimalisation in 1967
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,654
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Aug 22, 2018 4:09:23 GMT
I agree with sherro that it looks like a stamp, but I also agree with jimwentzell that something doesn’t look right about the stamp.
|
|
|
Post by sherro on Aug 22, 2018 5:45:59 GMT
The Chalon does look rather too large
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,654
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Aug 22, 2018 6:00:32 GMT
Thanks for your additional comment, sherro. I have some of these NZ Chalon issues in my collection, and I will have a look to see if I can find a scan of one to refer to. I also note that the Chalon stamp appears to be damaged, with a bit torn out near the D in NEW ZEALAND, and on Victoria’s face.
|
|
|
Post by jimwentzell on Aug 22, 2018 12:31:33 GMT
Thanks for your responses....upon closer examination it does appear to be a Chalon, extremely off-center. Just looked way too big to me to ba a real stamp. The dimensions appear twice the size of the accompanying stamps. The seller also mentioned in the item description " ...the QV image is NOT a postage stamp:"
The Sweden-based seller, from whom I have purchased many wonderful covers, is extremely conscientious and I've never had any problems over the several years dealing with them, so feel free to place a bid and compete with me if you see a nice cover!!! --Jim Wentzell stampguyaps177-681
|
|
|
Post by jimwentzell on Aug 22, 2018 12:43:19 GMT
I'm wondering, although it is in color, whether it could be an oversized photograph added for embellishment, maybe taken from a philatelic publication or other source....?
I don't think the standard printing capabilities were sufficiently advanced in 1932 to produce a detailed facsimile or photographic likeness of Her Majesty at the time for most publications. Could the cancel on the larger "stamp" be forged and the entire thing contrived for effect some time late? But to what avail?
Oh the superflous never-ending questions we philatelists burden our over-inquisitive, petty little minds with sometimes, it baffles mine to no end!!!
--Jim
|
|