hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Sept 2, 2020 16:57:08 GMT
(Moderator Note: This post and the ones that follow originally appeared in the Whatcha Been Stamping? thread but were moved into this new thread to further the discussion and to keep it in a place where it will have a better chance of being found by others. The new thread title was suggested by hrdoktorx , who made the original post.)
Today I received my trades from katie333 and angore ! A couple of evenings of stamping to look forward to, and maybe a few posts too! to them. It only took a week to arrive, even from the US. But, on a more serious note, I've been pondering a momentous decision. My reflection was triggered by, for the third time, having a reverse charge from Canada Post, which meant that their third attempt at mailing me the 2019 FDC collection and yearly collection album failed, like the first two. I'm tempted to give up on these altogether now and am unwilling to trust that further large packages will be coming. I still receive their small envelopes though, so it is not a mailing address issue, but maybe a customs one. Which gives me an opportunity to consider whether I wish to continue collecting new Canadian stamps altogether, and, by extension, the other countries for which I have subscriptions (USA, UN, France and territories, Monaco, Andorra, Mauritius, ...). I must say that the new stamps are rarely exciting, with the possible exception of the SPM and TAAF issues, which I might keep, but collecting up to 2020 is a round enough number to be appealing. I also went back through my stamp accounting and, in 2019 for instance, all the subscriptions together added up to nearly 2000 Euros (don't tell the wife!), which I could instead spend on other areas of my collection. And if I no longer seek new issues, that also prevents a lot of the expansion of my wish lists. And yet, I'm torn. Do I really want to put a time-stamp end to the collection? Advice and comments welcome!
|
|
renden
Member
Posts: 9,162
What I collect: Canada-USA-France-Lithuania-Austria--Germany-Mauritius-French Colonies in Africa
|
Post by renden on Sept 2, 2020 18:46:13 GMT
hrdoktorx - Xavier, you are the "boss" of your stamp collecting - I do think some Countries could be terminated, e.g. Canada LOL René
|
|
|
Post by classicalstamps on Sept 2, 2020 20:29:03 GMT
If you spent 2000€ on the classics every year, there are few "normal" stamps outside your reach. Think about filling those holes in your album you have always dreamt about...
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,911
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
Member is Online
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Sept 2, 2020 20:57:25 GMT
But, on a more serious note, I've been pondering a momentous decision. And if I no longer seek new issues, that also prevents a lot of the expansion of my wish lists. And yet, I'm torn. Do I really want to put a time-stamp end to the collection? Advice and comments welcome! Xavier, I am glad that you made this post, as I think it addresses an important question faced sooner or later by most collectors. I am thinking that this is a subject worthy of its own thread, and not something to be lost in this catch-all thread of what's going on today, but forgotten tomorrow. I will make you an offer, if you are agreeable. I think that there are two good ways to proceed: 1) You can cut and paste your own comments into a new post and create a brand-new thread on the subject, or 2) I can move your original post along with the responses and create a new thread for you. Do you have a preference? I just think that this is a great topic, which will recur as members come and go, and I don't want to see it lost in this catch-all thread. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Chris
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Sept 3, 2020 5:20:08 GMT
Hi Chris ( Beryllium Guy). You have my permission to split my post and the responses to it to a new thread. Another avenue I am considering is, at least for the country subscriptions for which I receive advertising literature about the new issues, to still consider buying the topical issues which would be of interest to me. These would only be a few per year so would reduce the load quite significantly, and I wouldn't feel I'm missing out on the most interesting stamps (to me).
|
|
tobben63
Member
Stamp eat sleep repeat
Posts: 1,874
What I collect: I collect to much, world wide!
|
Post by tobben63 on Sept 3, 2020 7:50:12 GMT
If you spent 2000€ on the classics every year, there are few "normal" stamps outside your reach. Think about filling those holes in your album you have always dreamt about... I fully agree with classicalstamps. €2000 is a lot of old stamps. You can always get the newest one in trades. On my Europeean collection I have stop on 1960-1970-1990 and 2005 depending on several things. Mot of all that new-issue policy to several countries is sky high. Older stamps are in my opinion far more interesting. I collect used stamps, and a lot of the new stamps are never used. FDC and CTO (same thing) are not my gate, even if i have several in my collection. My goal is not to have a complete collection, the fun is the time you sent searching for new (old) stamps for your collection. For me to bay new stamps complete new year set would be wasted money. The Norwegian year set goes for 1/2 face value on auction. (They will be used for postage on letters)(by me) I guess it is much the same in other countries. A good example is Færøyane "the Faroe Islands". On every Norwegian auction there is a Faroe Islands "subscribtion" collection witch goes for low money. I never bought one, but I have several partly collections that has come my way trough big box lots. As you understand I'm not a fan of subscribtion-collecting, that is not my kind of doing it. But it's your collection hrdoktorx, your decision.
|
|
|
Post by classicalstamps on Sept 3, 2020 10:53:30 GMT
I used to collect up to current issues for several counties. Some I got from subscriptions, some from just collecting. Not anymore.
I always ended up with the same problem:
After mounting the stamps, I almost never looked at them again.
Besides the economic aspect, I want to "get to know my stamps". This being the philatelic things such as varieties and postmarks, as well the historical context. By getting to know them, I revisit them again and again, bringing joy every time. I have found that the more I learn about a particular stamp/issue, the more joy it brings.
|
|
cjoprey
Member
Scanning stamps for my website...
Posts: 1,504
What I collect: Belgium (predominantly), British Commonwealth (older ones), WW (whatever comes my way...)
|
Post by cjoprey on Sept 3, 2020 12:04:23 GMT
The only 2020 stamps I pick up are topical stamps for things I really like - today I just went to the local post office to get the Sherlock Holmes 2020 souvenir sheet for the UK.
My cut-off for most countries is simply when the stamps stop looking well made (i.e. when they become mass-produced multi-colour stamps).
|
|
stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,906
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Sept 3, 2020 13:53:40 GMT
I collect no modern stamps with the cut off varying by country-
Germany ends with the final Deustche Post
Austria, Hungary, Belgium - late 50's early 60's
France 1970
and so on
the stop years are completely random and may be because of a series ending (finally)
I have a fondness for engraved
but to each their own, or as has been said to me before "whatever floats your boat!"
|
|
philatelia
Member
Captain Jack - my best kiloware find ever!
Posts: 3,655
What I collect: Ireland, Japan, Scandy, USA, Venezuela, Vatican, Bermuda, Austria
|
Post by philatelia on Sept 3, 2020 14:21:17 GMT
Everything I have written below is my OPINION. I do not intend to denigrate anyone's joy in collecting modern mint material. If you like these, then go for it! Do what makes YOU HAPPY. My post here is STRICTLY MY FEELINGS ONLY! I used to subscribe to new issue services, but I dropped them all back in the 1990s when they stopped using stamps on the covers to mail the purchases to me. Buying new issues makes me feel like a mouse on a treadwheel - you keep spending and spending, but you never actually draw any nearer to completion as they keep issuing more and more types of philatelic confections. In the past you could buy just one stamp, then the postal agencies started issuing stamps in small sheets insisting that you buy a full sheet or a block of four minimum. Then there was an explosion of booklets, souvenir sheets, imperfs and other formats. Most of these were not necessary for the mailing needs of the country in question, they were Farleyesque attempts to squeeze even more money from dedicated collectors or to create modern "rarities". Then the self adhesives arrived and you couldn't easily separate a single stamp from a sheet or booklet. Then, to add insult to injury, the Postal Administrations started charging exorbitant shipping fees. It wasn't quite so annoying when they covered the mailing envelope with copies of the new issues, but when they switched to metered mail, my hackles raised and I dropped my new issue subscriptions from those countries immediately. On the other hand, collecting postally USED new issues bypasses all their ploys to empty your wallet. It is incredibly challenging to find a copy of these issues that actually did the work of paying postage which reinforces the belief that those stamps had zero postal need. Now I watch auctions and wait for the collectors who shelled out the money to buy all of the issues to place them in auctions. And - yep - you guessed it! - most of the time you can buy them for a FRACTION of the issuing price. So, I patiently wait. For example, I recently purchased quite a bit of Aland through 2014 at about 20% of the issuing price. And as tobben63 mentioned, countries like Faroes are easy to find in these auctions. If you're willing to wait 10 years or more, those WILL show up for sale. You don't need to have a strict cutoff date - just defer purchases until they show up on the auction scene. To me, shifting the emphasis away from new issues to the classic material has made a HUGE difference in my collections. The money that I used to shell out to the Postal Administrations now purchases country collections. I now own MUCH more classical material and I'm MUCH happier! I actually have large sections of my collections virtually complete and now I'm mostly concentrating on varieties and more elusive classics. And - those are the stamps that actually hold their value or INCREASE because there are a limited number of them in existence. classicalstamps is right - $1000 to $2000 would purchase a fabulous mostly complete collection for many countries. And in many cases the collection comes with an album if you use those. You can often find collections with studies of varieties that you can build on, too. From a historical and philatelic point of view - collecting this way is MUCH more interesting to me. Also - modern material is all the same - you've seen one modern collection you've seen them all. But classical collections are all UNIQUE - especially used. To me it is MUCH MORE INTERESTING to look at a classical collection than to view page after page of post office mint issues. Yawn! Again - that is MY OPINION ONLY!
|
|
rex
Member
Posts: 1,216
|
Post by rex on Sept 3, 2020 15:53:33 GMT
Besides the economic aspect, I want to "get to know my stamps". This being the philatelic things such as varieties and postmarks, as well the historical context. By getting to know them, I revisit them again and again, bringing joy every time. I have found that the more I learn about a particular stamp/issue, the more joy it brings. I completely agree. Only used stamps since I start collecting, new only some classic series.
|
|
angore
Member
Posts: 5,698
What I collect: WW, focus on British Empire
|
Post by angore on Sept 3, 2020 16:21:54 GMT
I do not collect new issues intentionally. My worldwide collection ends around 1970 to 1980 (start of Princess Di and Disney era). My annual Christmas gift from my Dad is new US issues so I do get US and I stopped early US due to cost per stamp. I like quantity rather than rarity (expensive).
|
|
renden
Member
Posts: 9,162
What I collect: Canada-USA-France-Lithuania-Austria--Germany-Mauritius-French Colonies in Africa
|
Post by renden on Sept 3, 2020 16:27:40 GMT
Great thread, btw !! I rarely buy new stamps for my collection - stopped Canada more than 10 years ago (did not check inventory) - If there appears something special, I will buy it, though
René
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Sept 3, 2020 17:13:11 GMT
Thank you all for these thoughtful comments and opinions. They are really helpful in my decision process. Indeed, the money I would not spend on the subscriptions would go far to etch away at my wish lists. To add to philatelia's points about subscriptions, of all the ones I have, only the UN and Monaco still send their stamps in beautifully franked envelopes (especially Monaco). France and Canada just use metered cardboard. I also entirely agree about the feeling of being on a treadmill and the comment that most of the new issues are put once in the album and not looked at much anymore. I am a "completionist" collector, certainly for the countries for which I got subscriptions, and that is why I've been holding on for so long. And why I would set myself a date deadline to establish a clear limit towards that completeness. The idea of acquiring collections wholesale is certainly interesting, but I have tended to stay away from that because I don't know how I could then pass on of the many stamp duplicates I would end up with, and my collection is already extensive enough that there would always be a large group of them (and it would be a lot of work just to figure out what to keep and what to try to resell or trade away). Maybe once I'm retired or in a childless home with more available stamping time and space...
|
|
philatelia
Member
Captain Jack - my best kiloware find ever!
Posts: 3,655
What I collect: Ireland, Japan, Scandy, USA, Venezuela, Vatican, Bermuda, Austria
|
Post by philatelia on Sept 3, 2020 17:26:59 GMT
A very valid point, Doctor X!
Many collectors go through a collection, remove what they want and sell the remainder on Ebay or some such. Sometimes it is possible to sell the remainder for almost the same as the purchase price!
I don't mind the duplication because I enjoy trading to get the newer issues postally used, but I'm retired, disabled at home so I have more free time.
|
|
|
Post by greaden on Sept 3, 2020 18:58:20 GMT
I am not collecting everything from any country past the millennium, but I am looking for at least one stamp if a country changes its name, regime, or currency. Also, there are several topics for which I continue to collect anything relevant, except for agency cheesecake.
I have a weakness for recent stamps that bring back memories of a trip, or which exemplify a historical moment.
For example, I recently bought this Austrian stamp marking Brexit, where they had to fix the date:
In a US post office, I will buy two sheets of anything I like: one for the collection and one for my bills.
|
|
bcuddy
Member
Inactive
Posts: 123
What I collect: United States, famous people
|
Post by bcuddy on Sept 3, 2020 19:42:10 GMT
I'm a new collector, so maybe this affects my judgement. I really love some of the older US stamps. Either the single color engravings or some of the earlier multi color stamps. The WWII occupied country series is beautiful in my opinion. But some of the modern stamps also catch my eye. I just purchased the Bugs Bunny sheet because it reminds me of my childhood and they're fun stamps. I guess my opinion would be to maybe just be more selective on your post-2020 collecting. If something comes out that speaks to you in some way, collect it. But don't feel like you're missing out by not collecting everything.
|
|
|
Post by nbstamper on Sept 3, 2020 21:30:56 GMT
I'm going to express a slightly contrary opinion. If we stop buying new issues, I think many countries will eventually stop issuing them; i.e another small nail in the coffin of philately. The issue of new stamps I believe is primarily to raise revenue from stamp collectors, not for purely postal reasons. So I continue to buy new Canadian issues and I use the excess stamps for post cards (Postcrossing) and for the regular mail (yes, I still send out some regular snail mail). I also send mail to myself with hand-cancelled covers (maybe dumb) but they look nice and I doubt you are going to have much luck finding many of them 20 years from now. So I sort of agree the money is better spent buying a collection of oldies but goodies; but it is nice to see nicely cancelled 2020 stamps on cover in your albums.
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Sept 4, 2020 5:36:27 GMT
For example, I recently bought this Austrian stamp marking Brexit, where they had to fix the date:
I really like that Brexit stamp too, and it's on my wish list. I agree with the point made by nbstamper that the revenue is needed by some of the issuing administrations. Thus, I will not interrupt my US subscription until after November, the USPS sure needs the money until then. We'll see if and when my wife gets her absentee ballot from Florida. Yesterday my son received a birthday packet, mailed March 11th, from his aunt in the Palm Beaches area. It only took 180 days to arrive! Mail in the 1800s was faster. I am leaning towards stopping the subscriptions, but still receiving the advertisements, so I can see what is being issued and decide on a case-by-case basis, to get issues of special philatelic or topical interest to me. In the meantime, I'll be on the lookout for a 2019 Canada yearly collection album.
|
|
tobben63
Member
Stamp eat sleep repeat
Posts: 1,874
What I collect: I collect to much, world wide!
|
Post by tobben63 on Sept 4, 2020 7:09:29 GMT
For example, I recently bought this Austrian stamp marking Brexit, where they had to fix the date:
I really like that Brexit stamp too, and it's on my wish list. Be aware that by a mistake some stamps without the overprinted date has come in circulation! I have to come back to this with the information. However there are some other issues with this stamp Linn'sSorry for the side tracking
|
|
stanley64
Member
Posts: 1,979
What I collect: Canada, USA, Netherlands, Portugal & Colonies, Antarctic Territories and anything that catches my eye...
|
Post by stanley64 on Sept 4, 2020 8:37:03 GMT
Also - modern material is all the same - you've seen one modern collection you've seen them all. But classical collections are all UNIQUE - especially used. To me it is MUCH MORE INTERESTING to look at a classical collection than to view page after page of post office mint issues. Yawn! Again - that is MY OPINION ONLY! I think by your own argument philatelia, it is the used issues that make the collection unique. Post Office fresh is Post Office fresh, it is just with the classics that we are willing to pay a premium. However modern issues have the same collector's criteria, centering, gum condition, etc. Any collection is unique; try to create a modern collection with valid postal rates and the desired cancels affixed; now there is a challenge and such an album would keep my turning the pages with its diversity.
You have touched on an interesting topic though and it does coincide with the subject matter of collecting as opposed to the other side of the same coin which is philately. My collection of US Transportation coils is currently unique (I created it) and although it does have some holes even with the FDCs and some postally-used examples, I hope that I will continue to enjoy pulling the albums done from time-to-time and adding to this collection. To the early point though, philately begins where the catalogue stops and new collecting path emerges.
I digress though and in keeping with the thread, my thematic and topical collections will include the later issues post 2020...
Happy collecting!
P.S. A field of tulips looks the same from the train, but get close and you will see there are differences between each bloom :-)
|
|
kasvik
Member
Posts: 607
What I collect: Cancels mostly, especially Sweden Gävle and Lidingö, Switzerland Geneva, Germany Pforzheim
|
Post by kasvik on Sept 5, 2020 2:09:41 GMT
hrdoktorx raises a biggy. Recent issues don't do much for me either, not normally. Not even freaky printing errors and such. But if they have the right cancel, voom! Then I'm like philatelia ; they get my full attention. But that's rare, and getting rarer. Oh, the endless endless endlesss clicking clicking clicking.
Say this for nicely cancelled contemporary rarities; they're rare, but weirdly cheap. So often I feel like the only ding-a-ling out there. So my collections of classical stuff, even pricey classical stuff, actually grow faster than my contemporary albums filled with cheapies.
As for why there are so many recent issues flooding the market, at the same time when almost no normal person (just me and greaden ?) send a letter anywhere, except maybe a greeting card now and then... Well, we of all people know the answer. But it's entertaining—and nicely written—when journalism discovers:
'Wait a minute Mr Postman: Why African countries issue stamps celebrating English cricketers', The Economist, 20 August 2020
If you cannot get past The Economist pay wall, help me; I still have no idea how to link a. .pdf here.
|
|
angore
Member
Posts: 5,698
What I collect: WW, focus on British Empire
|
Post by angore on Sept 5, 2020 10:35:25 GMT
There are several major detractors for me on modern material but much centers around the self-adhesive.
For US 1. not always easy to separate self-adhesives into singles especially for two sided booklets 2. cannot readily buy many at any post office 3. push to collect entire sheets (usually 20 stamps) so cost is $11 (at 55c rate) for a sheet 4. collecting sheets discourages collecting in a traditional album method, The typical sheet mount is expensive, non-standard size, and add bulk when mounted to a page in album. You end up have a drawer of unused large mounts. 5. most stamps used in mail are the dull looking bulk rate issues. These do not inspire collecting 6. too much focus on pop culture for money than historical. Why would the USPS issue for Harry Potter? 7. Many US stamps do not soak 8. bulk rate stamps cannot be used on mail without a permit and presenting in person (have a bunch of these)
As noted earlier, my dad gives me a set of US stamps for Christmas. Since mostly sheets, I just put in 8.5x11-inch protective sleeves and toss in binder.
If I would collect modern in earnest it would be theme related like WWII, etc. There are still interesting stamps issued but collecting by country just to collect by country seems to be problematic.
|
|
|
Post by katie333 on Sept 5, 2020 14:40:50 GMT
Glad you got the stamps hrdoktorx ! I'll wade into this debate as I think it's an interesting question. For my country collections, I stopped collecting at year 2000. But for my topicals I am open to any and every issue even the most current. I also buy postage from Canada Post's new issues and try to use those when mailing letters in combination with the many older mint stamps I've acquired over the years. So I'm a hybrid and don't think there is a right or wrong answer to this question. I do agree with others that the most recent stamps are in demand by people trying to keep collections current and also painful to soak in most cases.
|
|
philatelia
Member
Captain Jack - my best kiloware find ever!
Posts: 3,655
What I collect: Ireland, Japan, Scandy, USA, Venezuela, Vatican, Bermuda, Austria
|
Post by philatelia on Sept 5, 2020 17:15:09 GMT
Spiffy Thread, everyone! Isn't it GREAT that we can agree to disagree in a friendly tone here on The Stamp Forum and no one gets all huffy? Everyone collects just a bit differently and that diversity enriches all of us, yes? To clarify a few points - Yes! I DO collect modern material, I just prefer to avoid the new issue subscription expenses. I always try to buy a few new se-tenant or multistamps (self adhesives with different designs are not technically se-tenants are they?) issues to use on philatelic mail - I try to use one on every cover I send and use my bazillions of older postage to pay the extra fees. However, I'm not sure why philatelists should subsidize philatelic agencies. Most modern postal systems are not interested in supporting collectors by providing a hand cancel, by not deliberately defacing stamps on covers or even in using their stamps to correspond with their subscribers, so I don't see why I should in turn be overly concerned about supporting them. If a nation truly needs stamps for postal usages they will print them no matter what, right? BUT that is purely my personal opinion. If you LOVE modern, thematic stamps, then have fun and enjoy them! stanley64 , you're right that classic used are fascinating, but I do actually stand by my position that classic mint collections are a bit more interesting than modern mint. Why? Well modern stamps are extremely uniform because they are printed in quantity using highly automated computer controlled equipment. Classics, on the other hand, have great variations in color, plate varieties, inking flaws - just oodles of ways that differences could sneak in because of the much more manual printing methods used. Another point - even if a collection is all modern issues, there are myriad ways of arranging and displaying them. So I wouldn't really yawn! Every collection is COOL!
|
|
stanley64
Member
Posts: 1,979
What I collect: Canada, USA, Netherlands, Portugal & Colonies, Antarctic Territories and anything that catches my eye...
|
Post by stanley64 on Sept 11, 2020 10:35:14 GMT
Thanks for the clarification philatelia and for the additional details missing from the original post. I think you are correct, but even as one that plates Canada's Imperial Penny Postage (aka The Map Stamp) with its myriad of variations, let us not to dismiss the modern material too quickly as being uniform; these stamps have their share of varieties as well if these pages are any indication, Canada Varieties, Error, Freaks and Oddities... Happy collecting!
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Feb 27, 2021 11:37:13 GMT
For my 3500th post, I thought I would give you recent news about my collection connected to the discussion we had in this thread. Following much soul-searching and the valuable advice from various TSF members, I have taken the plunge and decided to indeed (for the most part) limit my collecting interests to issues up to 2020. I will make an exception for topically relevant issues to my collection, on a case-by-case basis, and also am keeping the St-Pierre-et-Miquelon and TAAF subscriptions going for a while longer (though the latest offerings, particularly the 2021 TAAF issues, were disappointing, as we discussed already).
Thus, I have recently cancelled my subscriptions for France stamps, booklets and souvenir sheets, USA, Mauritius, UN, Monaco, French Polynesia, Andorra, Wallis-and-Futuna, and New Caledonia. I'll be cancelling Canada soon, after I receive the Black History Month issues for this year which I like because of their map background, and the Chinese New Year block that nicely closes the set of the last 12 years. This should allow me to redirect monies towards more rewarding philatelic acquisitions, which of course I will keep posting about on the forum!
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,911
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
Member is Online
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Feb 27, 2021 12:50:33 GMT
First of all, Xavier ( hrdoktorx), congratulations on your 3,500th post.... great stuff! Also, congratulations on reaching the decision about your collecting. I know very well that such decisions are often not easily arrived at, so good for you on doing it. I will be interested to see how it goes for you moving forward, and how you will end up using your new-found resources. Stay safe and stampy, my friend!
|
|
renden
Member
Posts: 9,162
What I collect: Canada-USA-France-Lithuania-Austria--Germany-Mauritius-French Colonies in Africa
|
Post by renden on Feb 27, 2021 13:46:35 GMT
Congrats Xavier hrdoktorx on your 3,500 posts and new collection decisions René
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,510
|
Post by salentin on Feb 27, 2021 18:58:59 GMT
I can understand your decision.I took the same in 2000. However for me it was more or less a question of money.I always liked to collect new issues,because I felt closer connected to the countries by that. Now I collect new issues only of Germany and Mauritius.However not on a standing-order base.Germany I receive from the philatelic service,while Mauritius on an ad hoc base,still looking for a standing-order-service. I do not think there is much of a pecuniar gain from buying older stamps versus new issues. Nearly all older stamps of the western countries of Europe,North-America,Australia etc. are declining for years and years.The only what makes the "old ones" look better is,that the quality-standards have become higher and such stamps of higher quality command higher prices.
|
|