skid
Member
Posts: 320
What I collect: NZ Chalons, 1800's NZ, Thames Valley NZ, and other interesting NZ stamps
|
Post by skid on Nov 27, 2021 5:38:08 GMT
Fiscal (revenue) stamps were authorized for postal use on 1 April 1882 (and conversely postage stamps became valid for fiscal use) and these were the 1880 fiscal issues. Some earlier from the 1867 issues were also used for postage. Fiscal stamps both postally used and fiscally used appear to have become more popular to collect in recent years. Faked postmarks on cleaned fiscally used stamps are common and some date stamps used by the Stamp Duties Department were similar to postal date stamps. So be careful! Here is the 1d in blue, it is also in lilac Here are some of the 1880 Fiscal stamps commonly listed as used postally. Some of these postmarks are questionable. Here are some of the earlier 1867 fiscal stamps that may have been used postally. Most of these postmarks are questionable
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Nov 27, 2021 20:21:27 GMT
Nice thread Mark. I was just chatting to Jim ( jimbabwe ) the other day about these actually. Another interesting area in NZ philately. Perhaps we can chat later about the period of the 1882 'Provisionals' at some stage. A period when Stamp Duty stamps were allowed to be used postally. In the meantime here are a couple of very interesting links to related sites : The NZ Society of Great Britain - NZ Society of Great Britain - revenue imagesDave Elsmore - NZ Revenues - Dave Elsmore - NZ RevenuesDave
|
|
Ryan
Member
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,720
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
|
Post by Ryan on Nov 28, 2021 17:43:39 GMT
Fiscal stamps were authorized for postal use on 1 April 1882 (and conversely postage stamps became valid for fiscal use) In an ancient post on TSF I showed a copy of one of these fiscal stamps used postally (I think, anyway) but I didn't know the date when such usage began. It turns out that the stamp I show looks like it has a postmark of 3 April 1882 - not quite first day of usage but not far off! It was just a random find while searching through some of my mountains of kiloware, just something come across by chance. Ryan
|
|
skid
Member
Posts: 320
What I collect: NZ Chalons, 1800's NZ, Thames Valley NZ, and other interesting NZ stamps
|
Post by skid on Nov 28, 2021 19:44:39 GMT
Nice thread Mark. I was just chatting to Jim ( jimbabwe ) the other day about these actually. Another interesting area in NZ philately. Perhaps we can chat later about the period of the 1882 'Provisionals' at some stage. A period when Stamp Duty stamps were allowed to be used postally. In the meantime here are a couple of very interesting links to related sites : The NZ Society of Great Britain - NZ Society of Great Britain - revenue imagesDave Elsmore - NZ Revenues - Dave Elsmore - NZ RevenuesDave Thanks Dave, good reference material. It is interesting that the fiscals might provide some information on the Chalon paper types and perforations.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Dec 3, 2021 20:50:45 GMT
Here are some of my 1878 1d blue Stamp Duty's postally used in the 1882 period. Because copies of the 1d First Sideface began to run short before its replacement became available postal use of the 1d Stamp Duty was specifically authorized in February 1882, and it was extensively used March-May 1882. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Dec 3, 2021 21:21:05 GMT
Postal use of values other than the 1d was not authorized until the Post Office Circular 82/41 of 22 April 1882. The 2nd Sidefaces had been available for issue by 1 April, but were not then widely released. Instead the authorities sought to use up all other stamps that could be used, in particular remaining 1st Sidefaces, but also the Long Type 4d, 6d, 8d and 1/- Stamp Duty.
Only as those were exhausted were the 2nd Sidefaces released. Their release date officially being 1 April 1882 but rarely found postmarked until mid to late 1882.
Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Dec 3, 2021 21:40:19 GMT
And here are examples of the 1st & 2nd Sideface stamps - late usage of the 1d 1st Sideface and an early'ish use of the 1d 2nd Sideface. The 1d blue Stamp Duty was authorized for use between these two issues. Late use of the 1d Mauve 1st Sideface - May 1882 - Top Row Early'ish use of the 1d Rose 2nd Sideface - Bottom Row Dave
|
|
skid
Member
Posts: 320
What I collect: NZ Chalons, 1800's NZ, Thames Valley NZ, and other interesting NZ stamps
|
Post by skid on Dec 4, 2021 0:10:21 GMT
The Fiscals may provide some information on the perforations. They had both 12.5 and 10 perforations and combinations of the two. Typically the combinations are 10x12.5, but I found a 12.5x10 (see the 6d). I don't know much about perforations, but if the perforating machines were used for both the log-type fiscals and the chalons etc, then the width between the perforations would have to be changeable to do the horizontal perforations on the fiscals. If both 10 and 12.5 have been used for this, then both types would have to be changeable. I don't think the comb perforations could be changeable and if the line perforators had multiple wheels, the wheels would have to be moveable.
|
|
skid
Member
Posts: 320
What I collect: NZ Chalons, 1800's NZ, Thames Valley NZ, and other interesting NZ stamps
|
Post by skid on Dec 4, 2021 0:17:24 GMT
The fiscals also had a range of perforations that might have also been used on the Chalons. I think this is an oblique roulette 16 or could it be Y?. It is interesting to see that it is cut horizontally, which makes sense as a strip of these long-type stamps would be easier to store and then just tear of one stamp from the strip, so why perforate horizontally. Did they also do this with Chalons?
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Dec 4, 2021 0:32:28 GMT
Hi Skid
Yes interesting part of the early revenues was the use of different experimental perforations / roulettes etc as tried also on the Chalons.
However, that may be for another thread as this thread you started is entitled "New Zealand: Postally used Fiscal Stamps".
Dave
|
|
skid
Member
Posts: 320
What I collect: NZ Chalons, 1800's NZ, Thames Valley NZ, and other interesting NZ stamps
|
Post by skid on Dec 4, 2021 1:08:19 GMT
Thanks Dave, I put them in the Chalon thread to see if they bring up any useful comparisons.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Feb 4, 2022 21:35:29 GMT
I just received in this item in a lot of other older NZ material. It has a postal type 'Squared Circle' postmark but was probably not used postally but as a revenue. There appears to be a very faint cleaned manuscript cancel on there so would have to be revenue usage BUT looks nice. p10 x 12½ Die 2 Blue / Green I couldn't find this one online in any of the available online catalogs so have just bought myself this book : Kiwi Catalogue of NZ Revenues & Railway Stamps. 7th edition and latest. 100 pages, A5 size in colour. Prices simplified and specialised. I look forward to it arriving and having a good look thru' it. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Apr 2, 2023 8:24:27 GMT
I notice in my 2022 SG New Zealand & Dependencies 7th Edition that in the Postal Fiscal section that SG have re-numbered some of the early 'Long type' postal fiscals - specifically the solo ' large N Z' F5 wmk group. Previously these had only been listed as varieties of the F5 - F21 group of a) p12 wmk.12a 6mm 'NZ & Star'. Now, in my 2022 SG New Zealand & Dependencies 7th Edition they are listed separately as F5 - F5kDue to seeing this I went looking more closely at my F5 - F21 range of items and to my delight came across this one: It made my day :-) SG F5j 9/- Orange wmk. F5 ('large N Z') cat. £1000 So the moral of the story is to double check your stock when SG renumbers things .... Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Apr 3, 2023 4:22:47 GMT
And for more on this (above), this article appeared in the book ' The New Zealand Stamp Collector - Celebrating 100 years! 1919 - 2019' Published by the Royal Philatelic Society of New Zealand Inc, 2020.Dave
|
|
xacs
**Member**
Posts: 41
|
Post by xacs on Mar 15, 2024 7:12:50 GMT
Nice find Dave. I remember when going through my long types years ago I found a 2/6 brown postally used which had W2 large NZ, but my CP catalogue at the time only mentioned a couple of the low values. I kept it of course and still in a simplified collection with others. It would be good to know more or is that the limits of info published? I will have to see about finding a new SG and if they have more on these, what value they reckon. Clayton
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 15, 2024 21:51:19 GMT
Here you go Clayton. Pages 148 & 149 - the relevant bits from the 7th edition of SG New Zealand & Dependencies: I note that the dates needed to be considered genuine postal usage is either 1882 or 1883. My 9/- above I see is 1885 - so considered philatelic! I hope this helps. Dave
|
|
xacs
**Member**
Posts: 41
|
Post by xacs on Mar 16, 2024 3:30:56 GMT
Thanks Dave. Saves me a trip to the library and answers a question I had years ago. Here is my 2/6. Christchurch Duplex. I am going to assume my date is 1882, though in reality I only have the "2" so could be a 92, 02, 12 etc...
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 16, 2024 20:05:27 GMT
Your 2/6d looks good to me Clayton. As good as any shown in the above 'New Zealand Stamp Collector' article. The Christchurch obliterator on your one matches a couple shown above.
BTW in the RPSNZ handbooks, vol.3 page 65 shows your 'C' duplex as figure 10. Their example is dated 21 MR 82 so quite obviously around in 1882, if not introduced about that time.
Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 16, 2024 20:09:36 GMT
I note that the dates needed to be considered genuine postal usage is either 1882 or 1883. My 9/- above I see is 1885 - so considered philatelic! I just re-read that 'New Zealand Stamp Collector' article and absorbed the last sentence from it : "Some of these stamps were so rarely needed that their usage extends to the mid-1880's"Hope therefore for my 9/- Dave
|
|
xacs
**Member**
Posts: 41
|
Post by xacs on Mar 17, 2024 5:18:36 GMT
Your 2/6d looks good to me Clayton. As good as any shown in the above 'New Zealand Stamp Collector' article. The Christchurch obliterator on your one matches a couple shown above. BTW in the RPSNZ handbooks, vol.3 page 65 shows your 'C' duplex as figure 10. Their example is dated 21 MR 82 so quite obviously around in 1882, if not introduced about that time. Dave Yes I had seen the example in RPSNZ Vol.3, but was unsure just how long this cancel was in use for. Just thought to check R.S. Craddock's 'A' Class and Allied Datestamps reference as remembered they have the Duplex cancels listed there too. In this it gives earliest known date as 21 MR 82 (that illustrated in RPSNZ) and last known as 5 FE 84. So seems quite unlikely to have been used as late as even 1892, which would be the next closest option. As for your 9s it seems a tricky one to prove either way and hence the qualification in NZ Stamp Collector article. Although the Wmk NZ and star 9s would have been available from 1882 through to 1885, there is no reason why someone would not have retained a stamp of this value for some years before using for genuine postal reasons. It then becomes a question of proving intent and there is no way to show if someone knowing they had an early issue with large NZ wmk deliberately put this through the post in order to 'create' a postally used example of such. An earlier date would be preferable but it is not so late as to warrant a philatelic classification. SG comment seems to relate more to new values not on the list requiring early usage to be included. Clayton
|
|
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 25, 2024 18:29:54 GMT
I picked up this piece a few weeks ago, but it has some question marks about it.
The £1 is an 1867 Die 1 revenue stamp. The ½d Newspaper pair are the 1875 "near 12" (CP B2b). It would be unusual (though not impossible) for these to be used for postal purposes in 1885 (use of revenue stamps for postal use became legal in 1882). However, questions arise from the pen mark on the top of the £1 - was this stamp fiscally used before the postal cancels? Moreover, the distribution and positioning of the cancels suggest that this piece was cut from a larger group - why not include all of the stamps on the piece?
Interpreting these questions requires an assessment of the cancels. Views on whether it looks fake or genuine, appreciated.
RK
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,873
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Mar 25, 2024 19:43:20 GMT
I picked up this piece a few weeks ago, but it has some question marks about it.
The £1 is an 1867 Die 1 revenue stamp. The ½d Newspaper pair are the 1875 "near 12" (CP B2b). It would be unusual (though not impossible) for these to be used for postal purposes in 1885 (use of revenue stamps for postal use became legal in 1882). However, questions arise from the pen mark on the top of the £1 - was this stamp fiscally used before the postal cancels? Moreover, the distribution and positioning of the cancels suggest that this piece was cut from a larger group - why not include all of the stamps on the piece?
Interpreting these questions requires an assessment of the cancels. Views on whether it looks fake or genuine, appreciated. RK Non specialist's guess. A cursory view, for me, suggests perhaps a shard from a monthly? payment on an outstanding account audit, for Postage used mailing a company's circulars / papers etc The only query on that suggestion is the blue paper ? I would have expected white general official paper. Would NZ Envelopes of the period exist in such blue paper? Looks genuine to me.
|
|
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 25, 2024 19:55:02 GMT
I picked up this piece a few weeks ago, but it has some question marks about it.
The £1 is an 1867 Die 1 revenue stamp. The ½d Newspaper pair are the 1875 "near 12" (CP B2b). It would be unusual (though not impossible) for these to be used for postal purposes in 1885 (use of revenue stamps for postal use became legal in 1882). However, questions arise from the pen mark on the top of the £1 - was this stamp fiscally used before the postal cancels? Moreover, the distribution and positioning of the cancels suggest that this piece was cut from a larger group - why not include all of the stamps on the piece?
Interpreting these questions requires an assessment of the cancels. Views on whether it looks fake or genuine, appreciated. RK Non specialist's guess. A cursory view, for me, suggests perhaps a shard from a monthly? payment on an outstanding account audit, for Postage used mailing a company's circulars / papers etc The only query on that suggestion is the blue paper ? I would have expected white general official paper. Would NZ Envelopes of the period exist in such blue paper? Looks genuine to me. Looking genuine is a good start . Appreciate you taking the time to offer your view, rod222. I have seen period NZ envelopes in different colours. I'm not a specialist on papers, but the paper feels similar to some envelops/covers I have from that period.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,873
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Mar 25, 2024 20:44:32 GMT
My only reservation, regarding postal use, is the current state of the "piece" Surely such an extraordinary postal value, would have been jealously preserved on full piece / cover if for not only the Value of such an item, but for NZ Philatelic posterity. I am more easily assuaged, imagining it a piece of Internal NZ Postal Stationery, somehow, leaked or taken from older unwanted, now rejected material. Inspired in part, by past experience of Australian Telegraph stamps, taken from old used out of date forms Similarly, revenue stamps, Passport stamps etc. The pen script on the £1 I would think consistant, with a postal clerk's confirmation of use and audit, from / for the office's internal records All speculation, of course. New Zealand Revenue on Blue Paper (Land Deed ?) link
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,217
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 25, 2024 20:53:38 GMT
Always arguments for and against these things Klem, as you are no doubt aware.
Blue paper was used to make envelopes of the time, as it was also used for revenue documents and papers also.
Don't forget that Richardson used a blue paper to print his 'Blue' Paper stamps of 1855 - 1858. That blue paper, used by Richardson, had been used to print the New Zealand Gazette as I recall.
They are cancelled by both manuscript and a 'postal like' 'A' class CDS - from a large office of the time - Dunedin.
I note that the postmark carries a time indica of an 'I' also. I find that a lot of the 'A' class CDS's used on revenue used items don't have this time indica on them - but not always.
There is also the point of postal rates at that time. What would have 20/- & 1d have paid for?
And then there is the use of the ½d 'Newspaper' stamps. I don't think I have seen these used on revenue pieces before. Are there any other known uses of the ½d on a known revenue piece?
Lots of questions arising from this - which is why we love a good mystery in this hobby - but my gut feel is that this is probably revenue usage.
Dave
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,873
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Mar 25, 2024 21:11:22 GMT
New Zealand Revenues on Blue Paper (Probate) also embossed 1904 (Oct.) Probate document with QV Long Type £50 grey, £4 pale blue & 7/- blue plus 5d Pictorial postage stamp (all with the perforations removed) tied by OTAGO datestamps and attached by lead fastener to the form which has been folded & bound. Most attractive.
|
|
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 25, 2024 21:13:15 GMT
Always arguments for and against these things Klem, as you are no doubt aware. Blue paper was used to make envelopes of the time, as it was also used for revenue documents and papers also. Don't forget that Richardson used a blue paper to print his 'Blue' Paper stamps of 1855 - 1858. That blue paper, used by Richardson, had been used to print the New Zealand Gazette as I recall. They are cancelled by both manuscript and a 'postal like' 'A' class CDS - from a large office of the time - Dunedin. I note that the postmark carries a time indica of an 'A' also. I find that a lot of the 'A' class CDS's used on revenue used items don't have this time indica on them - but not always. There is also the point of postal rates at that time. What would have 20/- & 1d have paid for? And then there is the use of the ½d 'Newspaper' stamps. I don't think I have seen these used on revenue pieces before. Are there any other known uses of the ½d on a known revenue piece? Lots of questions arising from this - which is why we love a good mystery in this hobby - but my gut feel is that this is probably revenue usage. Dave All good points, particularly about the time indication. And, the combo of Newspaper stamps and a revenue stamp is indeed mysterious, to say the least. But given the high face value, revenue usage is more likely.
|
|
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 25, 2024 21:14:47 GMT
New Zealand Revenues on Blue Paper (Probate) also embossed 1904 (Oct.) Probate document with QV Long Type £50 grey, £4 pale blue & 7/- blue plus 5d Pictorial postage stamp (all with the perforations removed) tied by OTAGO datestamps and attached by lead fastener to the form which has been folded & bound. Most attractive. The paper is quite similar to this revenue paper. No sign of embossing, however.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,873
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Mar 25, 2024 21:17:25 GMT
Why these New Zealand Revs, always on Blue Paper pieces ? "Curioser and curioser" (Alice in Wonderland) Similarly Leski Auctions (Land Conveyance on Blue Paper) NEW ZEALAND - REVENUES: 1870 (JAN.) CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT WITH QV LONG TYPE 10/- SALMON & GREEN TIED BY OTAGO '19JA70' DATESTAMP AND ATTACHED BY LEAD FASTENER TO THE FORM WHICH HAS BEEN FOLDED & BOUND. MOST ATTRACTIVE.
|
|
|
Post by redkiwi on Apr 6, 2024 6:03:53 GMT
I picked up this piece a few weeks ago, but it has some question marks about it.
The £1 is an 1867 Die 1 revenue stamp. The ½d Newspaper pair are the 1875 "near 12" (CP B2b). It would be unusual (though not impossible) for these to be used for postal purposes in 1885 (use of revenue stamps for postal use became legal in 1882). However, questions arise from the pen mark on the top of the £1 - was this stamp fiscally used before the postal cancels? Moreover, the distribution and positioning of the cancels suggest that this piece was cut from a larger group - why not include all of the stamps on the piece?
Interpreting these questions requires an assessment of the cancels. Views on whether it looks fake or genuine, appreciated.
RK
I came across this example online that nicely shows the use of blue paper for envelopes of the period. So, postal use is possible for the above piece. Also notable that the below cover is oversized and has 8d franking, indicating that blue envelopes may have been larger, which would go with the high franking on the piece if it is postal use.
|
|