|
|
Post by decentguy on Nov 10, 2022 7:48:48 GMT
Not sure if that's a good idea my friend ... In the past I haven't had much luck posting stuff... one too many times I never received anything and vice versa the number of times that happened I can't even count on my fingers ... Previously I had learnt the hard way, so I think mailing it is out of the question ... I was thinking maybe how about a private jet aye  ? |
|
zipper
Member 
Posts: 2,649
What I collect: Classic GB, QV, France Ceres/Napoleon, Classic U.S., Cinderella & Poster Stamps
|
Post by zipper on Nov 10, 2022 8:46:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by decentguy on Nov 10, 2022 8:53:41 GMT
Moving back to the height as per the post from vikingeck , here is an image with the "22.5mm" high stamp correctly aligned on the bottom stamp. This reveals that your stamp is about the width of the border shorter than the "22.5mm" stamp. From the image a rough estimate of the width of the border is around 0.25mm. So if the "22.5mm" stamp is accurate then your stamp would be "22.25".
Also, the ratio of your "22.5mm" stamp to your "22.25mm" stamp should be 22.5 to 22.25, but it is not. Assuming the "22.5mm" stamp is correct and comparing the heigh of this with the other stamp reveals a ratio that makes the "22.25mm" stamp 22.15mm high, thats a difference of 1mm. This clearly indicates that using a stamp as a ruler is wrong unless you know their heights are correct.
From one of the links I gave you on the previous thread:
Just my opinion as requested, hope this helps and good luck in your quest.
I Honestly dont think we are getting anywhere instead all what we been doing is going around in circles!! Our kind beloved members couldn't see the points I was making, Infact and it seems like some didn't even try to read what I was writing (saying) before responding, till now there wasn't any solid reason had been put forwards to convince me otherwise .... Not sure if I have any rights to ask for my thread to be locked down, that is what I wish for right now ... (Thanks Steven) Many Thanks from the bottom of my heart To Whom really tried to actually help... Roni |
|
|
|
Post by decentguy on Nov 10, 2022 8:55:40 GMT
THANK YOU SO MUCH ZIPPER.. much appreciate it and I will get onto it. Thanks again Cheers Roni |
|
|
|
Post by decentguy on Nov 10, 2022 12:29:58 GMT
Moving back to the height as per the post from vikingeck , here is an image with the "22.5mm" high stamp correctly aligned on the bottom stamp. This reveals that your stamp is about the width of the border shorter than the "22.5mm" stamp. From the image a rough estimate of the width of the border is around 0.25mm. So if the "22.5mm" stamp is accurate then your stamp would be "22.25".
Also, the ratio of your "22.5mm" stamp to your "22.25mm" stamp should be 22.5 to 22.25, but it is not. Assuming the "22.5mm" stamp is correct and comparing the heigh of this with the other stamp reveals a ratio that makes the "22.25mm" stamp 22.15mm high, thats a difference of 1mm. This clearly indicates that using a stamp as a ruler is wrong unless you know their heights are correct.
From one of the links I gave you on the previous thread:
Just my opinion as requested, hope this helps and good luck in your quest.
I Honestly dont think we are getting anywhere instead all what we been doing is going around in circles!! Our kind beloved members couldn't see the points I was making, Infact and it seems like some didn't even try to read what I was writing (saying) before responding, till now there wasn't any solid reason had been put forwards to convince me otherwise .... Not sure if I have any rights to ask for my thread to be locked down, that is what I wish for right now ... (Thanks Steven) Many Thanks from the bottom of my heart To Whom really tried to actually help... Roni Since the other copies weren't up to standards So thought I will redo them this time done up to Michael's standards as in to almost perfect eliminating any tiny bends in the paper also making sure it was dead flat sitting on top of the pair hope stamps    |
|
Admin
Administrator 
Posts: 2,676
|
Post by Admin on Nov 10, 2022 12:56:29 GMT
Per the OP's request, this thread has been locked.
[NOTE: Unfortunately, the National Philatelic Centre in NSW, Australia will only certify Australia issues from 1901 and beyond.]
|
|
?
