|
|
Post by printersart on Jan 11, 2023 20:03:26 GMT
I Just Can not find this answer anywhere for some reason Professional Baseball stamp 1381 Is It Tagged , it shows 1381a is tagged with black omitted , But my info doesnt state for 1381
Thanks Craig
|
|
renden
Member 
Posts: 8,729 
What I collect: World W collector with ++ interests in BNA (Canada etc) and USA
|
Post by renden on Jan 11, 2023 20:51:30 GMT
I Just Can not find this answer anywhere for some reason Professional Baseball stamp 1381 Is It Tagged , it shows 1381a is tagged with black omitted , But my info doesnt state for 1381 Thanks Craig Info I have = not tagged and my PB and other copies are not René |
|
khj
Member
Posts: 1,469
|
Post by khj on Jan 11, 2023 20:59:09 GMT
Scott US #1381(24Sep1969) is normally tagged. Weak tagging on that issue is not unusual, and the solid yellow+green do a pretty good job of causing the eye to miss out on the tagging.
It's one of those stamps where the tagging is more easily noticed with lights out.
Scott #1381b is the tagging omitted variety. Scott doesn't specifically state for #1381a, but I have always assumed that it is tagged.
|
|
renden
Member
Posts: 8,729
What I collect: World W collector with ++ interests in BNA (Canada etc) and USA
|
Post by renden on Jan 11, 2023 22:57:48 GMT
I Just Can not find this answer anywhere for some reason Professional Baseball stamp 1381 Is It Tagged , it shows 1381a is tagged with black omitted , But my info doesnt state for 1381 Thanks Craig EDIT: 9 copies done (2 blocks and 1 single MINT) with low UV light -Info I have = lightly Sorry for my mistake (UV light different in the USA) René |
|
khj
Member
Posts: 1,469
|
Post by khj on Jan 12, 2023 0:53:16 GMT
Yes, you are correct. In the US, you have to use relatively short-wavelength UV light source.
|
|
tobben63
Member
Stamp eat sleep repeat
Posts: 1,866
What I collect: I collect to much, world wide!
|
Post by tobben63 on Jan 12, 2023 11:26:41 GMT
|
|
