|
Post by luciano on Apr 25, 2023 16:05:24 GMT
I'm sorry for my english. Greetings everyone. I think this stamp is "good" (not fake) but I'm not sure. I believe it is the following catalog number: Scott 33 Michel 28 SG 26 Y&T 24 But mine is cut to the left. Killer scissors, or some variant? If the latter, may I know the relevant catalog number? Thanks a lot to everyone.
Luciano
|
|
stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,903
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Apr 25, 2023 16:16:49 GMT
Luciano
I do not know much about Albania, but I do believe the 'imperforation' is the result of a scissor cut as the stamp appears to be narrower at the top than bottom (unless your image is 'skewed)
A quick measurement should provide accuracy
Cheers Stan
|
|
|
Post by luciano on Apr 25, 2023 16:22:17 GMT
A quick measurement should provide accuracy Ops!
You're right, I apologize for not having thought about it: here are the measurements:
h mm. 39 L at the bottom mm. 32 L at the top mm. 32 a little ... abundant
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by classicalstamps on Apr 25, 2023 18:31:47 GMT
The stamps at the outer edge of the sheet are all imperf. on one side.
There are 7 recorded different forgeries of this issue. Yours match none of them, i.e. you can conclude it's genuine with a high degree of certainty.
|
|
|
Post by luciano on Apr 25, 2023 19:17:59 GMT
The stamps at the outer edge of the sheet are all imperf. on one side. There are 7 recorded different forgeries of this issue. Yours match none of them, i.e. you can conclude it's genuine with a high degree of certainty. Perfect! Thanks for the reply. Finally, are the catalog numbers that I have indicated (one is as good as the other) correct? Thanks again. Greetings.
|
|
|
Post by classicalstamps on Apr 25, 2023 19:46:48 GMT
It’s Michel no. 28, yes.
|
|
|
Post by luciano on Apr 25, 2023 20:35:29 GMT
Perfect!
Thanks again.
Greetings.
Luciano
|
|