|
Post by thunderbird on Nov 10, 2023 15:11:25 GMT
I'm still finding my feet with my inherited collection. Is it unusual to not find your stamp (especially one this old) in Stanley Gibbons? I see them listed as 145 (Pale Buff), 146 (Deep Green), 147 (Grey). Also it's plate 18 which is also not listed. The colour is like a mauve. Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,644
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Nov 10, 2023 15:23:06 GMT
SG190 (#162 6d with a 6d surcharge) issued 1883 plate 18 purple
Are you using the SG WW? The general catalogues donot list all stamps (you would need a specialized catalogue). The less common, are often omitted, and you may notice the catalogue #'s have gaps
BTW, yours is nicely centered!
|
|
|
Post by thunderbird on Nov 10, 2023 15:33:10 GMT
Thanks for the reply.
I have the Commonwealth and British Empire 2008 catalogue.
I see #162 which is listed as 6d Lilac plate 18.
However, it says type 50 (for the image reference).
Type 50 image isn't there!! Well... there is one of a "3d" which I'm now guessing is the "6d" overprint on the stamp.
All very confusing.
But I think you are right, that's the one.
|
|
|
Post by michael on Nov 10, 2023 15:44:24 GMT
The type 50 was referring to the watermark which was 3d not 6d, clearly an error.
It has been corrected according to the 2023 edition and it's type 43 with a surch type 51 which is a 6d surcharge.
We always say SG162 in the UK never #162, well I do anyway.
|
|
|
Post by thunderbird on Nov 10, 2023 17:27:23 GMT
Thanks... I wondered previously how SG was referenced.
SG162 it is (you posted #162 so I followed suit).
For other countries would it be (US for instance) SG US100 ? Or...
You have been very helpful and it is much appreciated.
|
|
stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,644
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Nov 10, 2023 17:55:16 GMT
It will depend on whose catalogue you are using. (and there are quite a few!)
and numbering is NOT standardized
as an example the Stoneham Great Britain Stamp Catalogue is well illustrated, but their numbering system is very different- the 6d surcharged 6d in the Stoneham catalogue is V349 (All QV issues start with "V" ). and I have not seen their numbering often noted- even though it seems a useful catalogue (once you find the stamp.....)
|
|
hdm1950
Member
Posts: 1,611
What I collect: I collect world wide up to 1965 with several specialty albums added due to volume of material I have acquired. At this point I am focused on Canada and British America. I am always on the lookout for stamps and covers with postmarks from communities in Queens County, Nova Scotia. I do list various goods including stamps occasionally on eBay as hdm50
|
Post by hdm1950 on Nov 10, 2023 19:07:29 GMT
thunderbird The Scott number for this stamp is 95. Lots for sale on eBay and plate 18 appears normal.
|
|
vikingeck
Member
Posts: 3,269
What I collect: Samoa, Tobacco theme, Mail in Wartime, anything odd and unusual!
|
Post by vikingeck on Nov 10, 2023 19:55:55 GMT
hdm1950 Not only is plate 18 normal ....it is the only plate so overprinted "6d" Issued in January 1883 as a temporary measure following complaints from mail sorters that the colour of the 6d stamp was confusing in poor light ( Gas or paraffin lamps ) with the common 1d lilac of 1881. It was there until the so called "Unified Seriies " or "Lilac and greens" with recognisably different shaped centres was ready in August 1883
|
|
|
Post by daniel on Nov 10, 2023 23:54:15 GMT
So, not actually a surcharge.
|
|
vikingeck
Member
Posts: 3,269
What I collect: Samoa, Tobacco theme, Mail in Wartime, anything odd and unusual!
|
Post by vikingeck on Nov 11, 2023 1:01:41 GMT
So, not actually a surcharge. I guess not , since it merely emphasises the original value . Just an overprint.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,922
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Nov 11, 2023 1:45:45 GMT
So, not actually a surcharge. Posted for completeness, not in contradiction. Depending on what Catalogue the collector employs.
The United States considers Overprints as "Surcharges" Scott #95 1883 6p on 6p is "surcharged"
"Askphil" (Collectors club of Chicago )
Definitions: Surch.: abbreviation for surcharge, overprint. Surcharge: 1: an overprint which changes the denomination of a stamp either up or down. 2: Universal Postal Union language is additional fee. 3: used on Britain and British Colonies issues may mean postage due. 4: can change a regular definitive stamp into a semi-postal stamp, or regular issue to an air mail issue. 5: zuschlag (Ger.).Surcharge Postage: Grenada, Trinidad and Tobago, postage dues.
Interestingly, Scott considers "Army Official" etc&etc as "Overprints"
|
|
|
Post by thunderbird on Nov 11, 2023 7:38:55 GMT
Issued in January 1883 as a temporary measure following complaints from mail sorters that the colour of the 6d stamp was confusing in poor light ( Gas or paraffin lamps ) with the common 1d lilac of 1881. Interesting and makes complete sense. I get the overprint now.
|
|
vikingeck
Member
Posts: 3,269
What I collect: Samoa, Tobacco theme, Mail in Wartime, anything odd and unusual!
|
Post by vikingeck on Nov 11, 2023 9:29:10 GMT
rod222 . To be really picky , and agreeing with daniel , overprint rather than surcharge. Definition 1 above does not apply Viz “1 an overprint which changes the denomination either up or down” , This does neither. Secondly. The currency in question is not “p” , new decimal “Pence” . It is the old pre decimal penny “d “ from the Latin “denarius”. The currency change was 1971 so if Rod is quoting Scott accurately , the Scott is incorrect . At the conversion the £1 remained the unit of currency and 240d old coins became 100p new pence
|
|
|
Post by michael on Nov 11, 2023 9:44:38 GMT
vikingeck Alex, all Scott pre-decimal stamps use p instead of d for all countries not just GB. This is reflected in US sellers on Ebay and Hipstamp. Search "Cape of Good Hope 4d" in the US dominated Hipstamp you get 6 hits, change 4d to 4p you get 51!
|
|
vikingeck
Member
Posts: 3,269
What I collect: Samoa, Tobacco theme, Mail in Wartime, anything odd and unusual!
|
Post by vikingeck on Nov 11, 2023 9:49:46 GMT
Ah well , that’s America for you.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,922
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Nov 11, 2023 10:45:15 GMT
Thanks Michael, I am in full agreeance with Daniel, "overprint" One does however, follow the Lingua Franca of the catalogue one employs. I was with Stanley Gibbons, for 6 years, then went to Scott, primarily to follow Steiner, and ebay listings (from my preferred dealer in North America) ergo, I had personally questioned Scott's "surcharges" when beginning. PS: I don't consider it "picky" to illustrate differing conditions in Philately, I welcome it, it engenders awareness, to what new collectors may encounter, when using differing catalogues etc. Where I do take advantage of the term "surcharge" correctly, or otherwise is, as a worldwide collector, I can bring up a subset of any particular country and find "overprints" and "surcharges" in one click It saves hours opening and thumbing through catalogues. Tunisia
|
|
rednaxela
Member
Posts: 177
What I collect: Germany in all its facets since 1871 (especially German Reich used including postal statinoneries, used), USSR, Austria, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Denmark, France. I design all album pages for my collection myself and partly make them available to the general public for use.
|
Post by rednaxela on Nov 11, 2023 12:03:07 GMT
So, not actually a surcharge. Posted for completeness, not in contradiction. Depending on what Catalogue the collector employs.
The United States considers Overprints as "Surcharges" Scott #95 1883 6p on 6p is "surcharged"As a German-speaking stamp collector, I was and still am also rather confused by the term "surcharge", especially in the Scott catalog, and its distinction from the term "overprint". An article in Linn's Stamp News from 2002, which I consider to be very well-founded, has certainly provided a little more clarity. Nevertheless, the semantic-logical problem remains for me that the term "surcharge" sounds like something additional (e.g. a higher face value of the stamp in question or an additional amount, e.g. for a charitable purpose), but is also used in the Scott catalog for overprints that lower the face value. Not to mention overprints that make the stamp in question usable for another country with another currency. Here, the face value is neither increased nor decreased, but a "new" face value is defined. In addition, there are cases in which both an "overprint" and a "surcharge" can be found on a stamp...
|
|
vikingeck
Member
Posts: 3,269
What I collect: Samoa, Tobacco theme, Mail in Wartime, anything odd and unusual!
|
Post by vikingeck on Nov 11, 2023 13:42:01 GMT
. In addition, there are cases in which both an "overprint" and a "surcharge" can be found on a stamp... Indeed rednaxela, here is a modern one from Grenada. Initially issued a $2 then re issued overprinted ASSOCIATED STATEHOOD, and later issued again surcharged $5 ….. the other Alexander 😄
|
|
|
Post by thunderbird on Nov 15, 2023 11:52:34 GMT
I have another SG catalogue query! Would I expect to find "Contract Note" in Gibbons? I ideally would like to have all my collection with SG numbers.
|
|
|
Post by michael on Nov 15, 2023 11:59:48 GMT
You won't find it in the SG catalogue as it is a revenue stamp used for a tax on an agreement to purchaser shares or securities.
They are listed in 'United Kingdon Revenues' by J. Barefoot Ltd.
It is circa 1910, No. 28 and catalogues at £7.50 (2010 edition)
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,922
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Nov 15, 2023 13:20:04 GMT
I have another SG catalogue query! Would I expect to find "Contract Note" in Gibbons? I ideally would like to have all my collection with SG numbers. Also found in the free FORBIN catalogue online (No Pictures black and white) 1915 It is there at 1907 #23 CV £2
Then again in Barefoot 1989 it is now Barefoot #24 still £2 Typo Wmk 2 Orbs Paper unsurfaced or chalky Perf 14 or 13.75
|
|
salmantino
Member
Posts: 266
What I collect: Specialised UK and overprints, Ireland, Netherlands, Spanish permanent stamps.
|
Post by salmantino on Jan 18, 2024 13:18:42 GMT
Returning to the original post. A collector of France wrote that French catalogues use 'Surchargé' for overprints. The English word derives from the French. At the time, this meaning of the word may not have led to any discussion. If Stanley Gibbons would call it an 'overprint,' the next question would have been of what? This was not an existing stamp. The printing in this colour was intentional: the intention was to issue a series of provisional 'unified' postage and revenue stamps. The use for revenue purposes caused the Inland Revenue to require it would be printed in double-fugitive ink. At the time, that meant either in green or lilac. If an overprint is anything that prints a design over a design that was printed at an earlier stage, many modern stamps printed in four basic colours would qualify to be called an overprint. Whatever you call it will evoke a discussion. The intention was to issue a range of stamps of this type in the existing designs. In the end, it was decided to only issue the most used values for revenue stamps. Trials for the 'surcharge' were conducted. The existing 1881 penny lilac was overprinted with the values 3d, 6d, and 1s in red and in blue. Two strips from these trials from the Phillips Collection came up for auction on 16 January 2024 when Baldwin's (previously Stanley Gibbons) auctioned the second part of this collection. Images from Baldwin's sale 5968 catalogueEventually, only the 3d and 6d values were issued with a 'surcharge' in carmine. 1 January 1883, Unified issue with surcharge in carmine, Stanley Gibbons nrs. specialised K8A and K8B (Concise 159 and 162)
|
|
|
Post by daniel on Jan 18, 2024 14:29:16 GMT
Indeed, Stanley Gibbons also call it a surcharge. The use of the word surcharge to mean "make an extra charge on" dates from 1885, 2 years after the 3d and 6d stamps in question. But that is certainly the current meaning. I wonder how these stamps were described when they were issued?
Either way, we need to keep the word overprint in the philatelic sense since not all overprints relate to value.
Daniel
|
|
salmantino
Member
Posts: 266
What I collect: Specialised UK and overprints, Ireland, Netherlands, Spanish permanent stamps.
|
Post by salmantino on Jan 18, 2024 14:52:45 GMT
E.g., British to pay labels overprinted for use in Southern Rhodesia.
|
|
|
Post by daniel on Jan 20, 2024 20:55:58 GMT
The intention was to issue a range of stamps of this type in the existing designs. These are essays for the projected stamps:
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 9,922
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Jan 20, 2024 21:45:01 GMT
These are essays for the projected stamps: daniel Great Britain : Die Proofs and Imprimaturs Auction December 1975 Robson Lowe
Lot 1748 est £45 realised £125 Lot 1752 est £45 realised £155
|
|