antoniusra
Member
Inactive
Actively pursuing every stamp I do not have and continuing to expand my site.
Posts: 416
|
Post by antoniusra on Oct 23, 2013 17:02:50 GMT
Someone was asking whether there was a way to distinguish the number 304s from the 315. This has been a question asked by most U.S. collectors at one time or another. I could not find the information when it was asked here, but just now stumbled across it and thought it would be of interest. A friend of mine from the Ebay chatboard, Jim Dire, did a lot of research on that question and came up with a way he believes answers the question. Note: used #315 is extremely rare. Last count I remember, was 6 known copies. Any collector should realize that you have a much better chance in winning it big in the lottery, than stumbling across a used one. I doubt there is any other U.S. stamp that has had it's perfs removed more often than the 304. The article below can also be seen here: www.jamesdire.net/tinyeye1.JPG
|
|
I.L.S.
Departed
Rest in Peace
I am in Clearfield, Pa. I love US Classic covers!
Posts: 2,113
|
Post by I.L.S. on Oct 24, 2013 6:11:03 GMT
That's very interesting as I have never heard of this "tiny eye" variant before? Thank you.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 27, 2014 7:46:24 GMT
The "6 known used copies" is interesting but it seems quite low. The PF website has 77 items from a search of Cat = 315 and condition = used. Some are trimmed 304's and some are clearly 315 but with the opinion that the cancel is not contemporary (since they are imperf pairs they must be 315s) but many more than 6 are considered genuine. However, the earlier items may have just judged the Scott number and not whether the cancel was genuine and of the period that the stamp was in use. Anyway, the PF site is a wonderful resource.
|
|