marbles
Member
Posts: 101
What I collect: Nothing too expensive for commonwealth
|
Post by marbles on Feb 23, 2024 19:11:06 GMT
Hi. Just going through Great Britain stamps and from 1952 there are hundreds of duplicates. How do you all separate them from the set. Do you put them in an another binder. Also his dad hinged them on anything eg: cornflake boxes or anything he could get his hands on. I would not dare soak them or try and unhinge them as I am such a novice at this due to helping my husband who is poorly. Any answers would be appreciated. Thanks
|
|
banknoteguy
Member
Posts: 324
What I collect: 19th Century US, High denomination US (> $1), 19th century covers US, Indian Feudatory States and most recently I acquired a BigBlue [with about 5,000 stamps] and pristine pages.
|
Post by banknoteguy on Feb 23, 2024 19:27:23 GMT
You probably need to assess what is worth doing and what is not. Mounting stamps in an album is a lot of work. Getting stamps off paper (like envelopes) before mounting is even more work. Most (but not all) modern stamps [say after 1950] are not worth much. If you are doing this because you want to collect stamps as a hobby then all this work may make sense.
If you are doing this with the goal of selling the collection, it may not make $ sense.
If you are worried about getting hinged stamps off whatever they are hinged on, there is an easy solution. Just use a sharp knife under the stamp and slice right through the hinge (i.e, the crease in the hinge). Then remount it or put in on a page like you illustrated. I have harvested thousands of stamps that way.
|
|
vikingeck
Member
Posts: 3,548
What I collect: Samoa, Tobacco theme, Mail in Wartime, anything odd and unusual!
Member is Online
|
Post by vikingeck on Feb 23, 2024 19:43:35 GMT
It can be tedious to remove all the paper from used stamps, however for all GB stamps which were lick and stick , ie not the later self adhesive ones, soaking is not a problem.
I regularly put a batch of 40-50 in a bowl of tepid water , leave for up to 30:minutes, sometimes longer if I forget, then the stamps and paper separate easily.
I then lay the stamps out face down on a sheet of kitchen towel , pat to absorb surface water and leave to dry.
|
|
|
Post by rawners on Feb 23, 2024 19:56:31 GMT
Hi. Just going through Great Britain stamps and from 1952 there are hundreds of duplicates. How do you all separate them from the set. Do you put them in an another binder. Also his dad hinged them on anything eg: cornflake boxes or anything he could get his hands on. I would not dare soak them or try and unhinge them as I am such a novice at this due to helping my husband who is poorly. Any answers would be appreciated. Thanks Hi, The Wilding definitive stamp issues from 1952 to 1967 are quite difficult to define. the 3 different watermarks are notoriously poor to read, plus the graphite and phosphor issues make about seven sets of, on the face of it, the same stamp. I certainly can't identify them using lighter fluid and have only limited success using a Signoscope. As they are numerous and low value go ahead and soak a few.
|
|
marbles
Member
Posts: 101
What I collect: Nothing too expensive for commonwealth
|
Post by marbles on Feb 23, 2024 20:07:53 GMT
Thank you for your replies. We won’t be selling any but I will have a go at soaking some of the duplicates to see how I get on. I will have to do it when hubby is not watching though. This is just an example of 100s of them.
|
|
salmantino
Member
Posts: 266
What I collect: Specialised UK and overprints, Ireland, Netherlands, Spanish permanent stamps.
|
Post by salmantino on Feb 23, 2024 20:35:37 GMT
Hi, The Wilding definitive stamp issues from 1952 to 1967 are quite difficult to define. the 3 different watermarks are notoriously poor to read, plus the graphite and phosphor issues make about seven sets of, on the face of it, the same stamp. I certainly can't identify them using lighter fluid and have only limited success using a Signoscope. As they are numerous and low value go ahead and soak a few. Actually, that is a GB Concise Catalogue count. Most collectors will stop there. There are about ten sets. The phosphors come with green, blue and violet fluorescence. The violet one with 9½mm and 8mm bars. One of the 'Crowns' phosphor set comes on creamy and whiter paper.
|
|
marbles
Member
Posts: 101
What I collect: Nothing too expensive for commonwealth
|
Post by marbles on Feb 23, 2024 20:35:57 GMT
Thank you all for your advice and apologise if I have already posted but can’t find it. We are not selling as they belonged to his dad and inherited them. Just trying to sort them out to look nice. Pre 1952 are good but still a lot of duplicates. Does anyone keep duplicates either old or the newer ones.
|
|
banknoteguy
Member
Posts: 324
What I collect: 19th Century US, High denomination US (> $1), 19th century covers US, Indian Feudatory States and most recently I acquired a BigBlue [with about 5,000 stamps] and pristine pages.
|
Post by banknoteguy on Feb 23, 2024 22:16:21 GMT
Virtually everyone has duplicates. What people do with them varies quite a bit. Some like having dups, some don't. I put dups in a stock book with multiples of the same variety on top of each other, like this:
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 11,047
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Feb 23, 2024 22:50:14 GMT
Personal opinion.
If you are not selling, leave them exactly as they are ! Soaking is only going to damage them further What you show is fine, they appear to have been saved with care.
They hold immeasurable information in varieties and Postmarks.
Soaking those is a folly, a complete waste of time and energy.
|
|