Anyone able to see quickly that it is NOT #361 and #358?
Mar 16, 2024 15:00:04 GMT
Philatarium, hrdoktorx, and 1 more like this
Post by NordicTraveler on Mar 16, 2024 15:00:04 GMT
Hello
First 5 cents
#335. I have little faith that it could be #361, then you have to have maximum luck... but I was so unsure, so I would like some input. What do you think?
What "bothers" me is that the entire back has a uniform greyish shade color over the entire back. The front side does not have a very clear gray colour, maybe a little dirty front side.
But the stamp appears a bit duller/colourless compared to others.
Microscope images are from this stamp. I mean seeing fibers that are twisted with blunt ends. Something that is typical for Ragfiber. The flat even fibers are woodfibre.
But if someone clearly sees that I'm caught up in naive optimism and have forgotten to look for what confirms that it's NOT, then tell me :-)
TWO CENTS
What do you think of this 2 cent scott #332? Might it be helpful to check out a bit more if it could be #358? In the microscope I also found there some twisted fibers with blunt ends.
(I forgot to label the picture, there are 5 pcs #504, 5 pcs #305, 1 pc #406)
Upps, the stamp in question is number 2 from the left, above
V
First 5 cents
#335. I have little faith that it could be #361, then you have to have maximum luck... but I was so unsure, so I would like some input. What do you think?
What "bothers" me is that the entire back has a uniform greyish shade color over the entire back. The front side does not have a very clear gray colour, maybe a little dirty front side.
But the stamp appears a bit duller/colourless compared to others.
Microscope images are from this stamp. I mean seeing fibers that are twisted with blunt ends. Something that is typical for Ragfiber. The flat even fibers are woodfibre.
But if someone clearly sees that I'm caught up in naive optimism and have forgotten to look for what confirms that it's NOT, then tell me :-)
TWO CENTS
What do you think of this 2 cent scott #332? Might it be helpful to check out a bit more if it could be #358? In the microscope I also found there some twisted fibers with blunt ends.
(I forgot to label the picture, there are 5 pcs #504, 5 pcs #305, 1 pc #406)
Upps, the stamp in question is number 2 from the left, above
V