|
Post by jkjblue on Mar 20, 2022 16:26:00 GMT
bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/03/what-are-differences-between-1872-and.htmlThe Egypt 1872 and the 1874-75 issue by the Khedive's Paper Factory and printing Housein Bulag, Cairo, used the same original dies for both issues, except the the second printing of 1874-75 was from new plates. But the differences seen between the issues (Paper differences, Impressions (Clear vs Blurred), different Perfs, different color of stamps, Plate changes and touchups) are significant enough that they are considered different issues, and not just different printings. The Scott catalogue and Stanley Gibbons recognize this, and breaks them out into respective issues with major and minor numbers. Interesting, the Michel keeps them all under the "1872" category. Yet, I think most collectors are somewhat confused by these stamps. A perusal of web sites illustrating Egyptian stamps of the era by non-Egyptian specialist collectors show limited understanding and, at times, outright mistakes. Interested? Check out the link above!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Apr 6, 2022 14:51:09 GMT
bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/04/egypt-1872-litho-typo-1874-75-typo.htmlEgypt 1872 ( Litho /Typo) & 1874-75 (Typo) Issues: 20 Paras & 1 Piaster Differences?This is a complicated post for a complicated area. If you are at all interested in sorting out lithographic vs typographic 1872 20 Paras and 1 Piaster "Sphinx and Pyramid" stamps, this post should be helpful. And I give an easy way to sort out the differences between the 1872 and 1874-75 issues. Interested? Check it out!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Apr 23, 2022 19:58:01 GMT
bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/04/egypt-1872-1874-75-issues-2pi-2-12pi.htmlEgypt 1872 & 1874-75 Issues: 2pi, 2 1/2pi, & 5pi Differences? The higher denominations (2pi, 2 1/2pi, 5pi) for the 1872 & 1874-75 printings pose their own identification challenges. But unlike the preceding post in this series ( 20pa, 1pi), there are no lithographic stamps to consider; They are all typographic. Interested? Check out the link.
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on May 10, 2022 18:57:23 GMT
Fournier Forgery Imitating 1872 Scott 20 10pa lilac "Sphinx and Pyramid" bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/05/a-look-at-fournier-forgeries-for-egypt.htmlAs I have just completed a series of blog posts on the Egypt 1867, 1872, & 1874-75 "Sphinx and Pyramid" issues, this should be a good time to show some forgeries. The forgeries shown here are no means exhaustive, but Fournier forgeries (whether he did the forgeries himself, or fenced them for other forgers) are relatively common, and I have one 1867 issue Torres forgery to show as well. The format will be relatively simple for the genuine/forgery stamps I have for these issues. I will illustrate a genuine, and then a forgery. We will then compare/contrast to get a better idea of the differences. Interested? Click the link above.
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on May 27, 2022 14:24:51 GMT
1867 Scott 11a 20pa blue green Type 2 bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/05/four-types-of-1867-egypt-20-para-green.htmlThe 1867 lithographic issue presents some very interesting challenges for the collector: Namely the differences among the four engravings resulted in four major types on the stones, so that any block of four will have the four types. For a sheet of 200, there will be 50 of each type. What makes it even more challenging is the information on the four types isn't easily found. Yes, the Egypt specialist literature has it, but all the major catalogs do not give specific information. Well, I went on a quest to find the four types each of the six denominations. So far, I have four types for the 5pa orange (link above -scroll up), three types for the 10pa lilac, two types for the 1pi rose red, two types for the 2pi blue, and one type for the 5pi brown. Finding more type used copies of the 10pa, 1pi, and 2pi is still feasible (CV $10+), but, budget wise, probably not for the 5pi (CV $200). I will continue to try to obtain all four types for the 10pa, 1pi, & 2pi denominations. I can scan @1200, and pick up all the subtle changes seen in types - the pics and scans available elsewhere are of lower resolution. Now the good news: I also have all four types for the 20 Para greens! So here we go! Interested? Check the link!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Jun 13, 2022 16:54:12 GMT
1859 Scott 35 10c green "Washington" Type V on Domestic Cover Recent Acquisitions - United States
Taking a break from the "deep in the weeds" recent stamp posts, here is a link to my recent USA acquisitions. Enjoy!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Jun 30, 2022 14:44:17 GMT
1853 SG 2 (Sc2a) 4 pence deep blue/ deeply blued paperbigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/06/cape-of-good-hope-triangulars-1853-1864.htmlFor TSF members that have been following the COGH thread, you are aware that I have been interested in COGH triangulars lately. With the huge help of Chris ( Beryllium Guy) - I have been able to know much more about them. The blog post (linked above) and those that follow are my attempt to provide a basic approach for the 1840-1940 classical era collector. Enjoy!
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,914
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Jun 30, 2022 15:06:28 GMT
Jim ( jkjblue), congratulations on a very nice post about the Cape Triangles.... very well done, in my opinion! I enjoyed reading your comments, and I am looking forward to seeing the next installments. I am glad that our discussions on TSF have helped you to document more info for others. I guess I had better get moving and get my article finished!! Congrats, again!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Jul 18, 2022 19:43:28 GMT
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,914
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Jul 18, 2022 20:43:52 GMT
Thanks for your post and for the tag, Jim ( jkjblue).... Please accept my compliments on another fine post for your blog! As usual, you have captured the essence of what is going on with Cape Triangles, even when it is a bit challenging to decipher, and I commend you for that. Believe me, as I am working on my article, I seem to be finding all sorts of situations where deeper explanations are needed for real understanding. It's not always easy to explain things clearly, but you do it very well indeed! Great job and congratulations on your latest!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Aug 3, 2022 17:56:39 GMT
COGH 1853 SG 3 1p brick red/ slightly blued paper Scott 1 brick red/ bluish paperbigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/08/cape-of-good-hope-triangulars-1853-64.htmlThe One Pence Reds, intended initially for newspapers, offers a nice challenge for collectors, not the least that the CV runs in the $300-$400 range, about 2-3X as much as the Four Pence Blues. It follows much like the history of Great Britain 1841-1869 One Penny Reds/ Two Penny Blues, also manufactured by Perkins, Bacon, in the complexity of the issues. This One Pence Part A post is the third in the COGH series. It will cover the Perkins, Bacon One Pence issued stamps of 1853 (blued paper) and 1855-58 (white paper). The Part B post, the next one, will review the 1863-64 De La Rue One Penny issues. Again, much thanks to Chris ( Beryllium Guy) of TSF, who served as mentor while I was attempting to "get up to speed' on these One Penny Reds. Thanks Chris!
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,914
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Aug 3, 2022 20:43:25 GMT
Once again, a very nice job on your latest Cape triangle blog post, Jim ( jkjblue).... I guess that these have really captured your fancy, as I don't ever recall your making so many consecutive posts about the same series like you have with these. I take that as a real tribute to the significance of Cape triangles in classic philately! I will keep reading each time you post, and then updating the bibliography for my article. Let's see how many more installments you can get posted before I finish my article.... I am guessing that it will be way many more than I would have wanted. That's what I get for being seriously slow! Anyway, congratulations on another fine Cape triangle blog post!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Aug 4, 2022 0:27:20 GMT
Chris ( Beryllium Guy ) - Your comments are spot on. Yes, indeed the COGH triangles are a significant and very interesting issue! And I will have 2-3 more posts about the COGH triangles before I am finished. (Don't worry about the careful progress on your own article. It is marinating, and getting better by the day. When it comes out, it will be worth it.) Previously, I have turned my philatelic magnifying glass on other countries early series, just not the same issue. Example: Early AustriaAustria & LV: 1850 "Coat of Arms" Austria & LV: 1858-59 Issue Austria & LV: 1860-64 Issues Austria 1867-84: Franz Josef's Whiskers - Coarse or Fine? Austria 1867-84 5k rose: a study
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Aug 20, 2022 20:17:40 GMT
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,914
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Aug 21, 2022 7:06:55 GMT
Another excellent segment on the Cape Triangles, Jim ( jkjblue)! I will need to update the bibliography for my article again, but I donât mind, as it is great to see you putting some good information out there. I am closing in on getting my article finished. I estimate that it is about 80% done. It is due by mid-September, so despite my slowness, still on track for publication. Anyway, congratulations again on your latest!
|
|
angore
Member
Posts: 5,702
What I collect: WW, focus on British Empire
|
Post by angore on Aug 21, 2022 9:56:14 GMT
Nice color!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Aug 21, 2022 12:50:32 GMT
Chris ( Beryllium Guy) - thanks for the compliment - this post was the easiest of the four (so far) to complete. I am so glad your article is getting close to being done. I can't wait to see the results. !! FYI, I am preparing a post on COGH 4d blue sulfuretting and treatment with many examples shown. Should be published on my blog around Nov 30th.
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Sept 6, 2022 16:45:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Sept 23, 2022 16:08:53 GMT
Portuguese India 1880 Scott 69 50r dark blue "Portuguese Crown" Fournier Forgerybigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/09/portuguese-colonies-crown-issues.htmlThe "Portuguese Crown" issues for the Portuguese colonies offer a challenge for the WW collector. For Angola, they are found in various Perfs and paper thickness: altogether 29 bolded numbers in Scott for nine denominations. Reprints (1885, 1905) of these issues on smooth white chalky paper or ivory paper were also produced. There are also some minor number color variations. But all the above is not the real problem. Unfortunately, there are plentiful forgeries. The major players were Fournier and Spiro, but there were others also. Let's talk about the Fournier forgeries of the "Portuguese Crown" issues for Angola and the other Portuguese colonies. As it turns out, Fournier first used the Angola "Portuguese Crown" issue for his forgery template. That consequently makes it more difficult to tell Fournier forgeries apart from the genuines for Angola, as they appear ( without close scrutiny and certain signs) to be identical. There will be much more about this later with the next post. For the other Portuguese colonies, the design of the genuines are somewhat different than Angola's design. But Fournier kept some of the attributes of his Angola forgeries for the other Portuguese colonies forgeries, which makes it easier to spot a Fournier forgery for the other Portuguese colonies. Interested? Check out the link above for a general introduction to the Fournier forgeries for the Portuguese colonies "Crown" issues.
|
|
|
Post by gstamps on Sept 24, 2022 19:15:51 GMT
Thank you jkjblue for the excellent description of the differences between genuine stamps and forgeries. I understand that the stamps from Angola are more difficult to differentiate. I think my stamp is genuine?? (I identified Ceres type stamps from my collection as fake and therefore I have a doubt) Thank you in advance for an evaluation. George
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Sept 26, 2022 21:03:03 GMT
gstamps - Sorry, your attached image is not coming through. If your question is about Gen/Forgery Angola "Crown" stamps, I suggest you wait until the next blog post on this subject is published in two weeks. It may answer your question.
|
|
|
Post by gstamps on Sept 27, 2022 0:31:51 GMT
Thanks, jkjblue, looking forward to your blog post. On my stamp, the cross above the crown is unclear for identification. I happily rediscovered your blog and checked out some Serbian stamps in my possession.
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Oct 10, 2022 18:09:03 GMT
Angola 1877 Scott 9 300r chocolate "Portuguese Crown"; Perf 13 1/2 Genuinebigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/10/angola-1870-77-crown-issue-genuine-vs.htmlThe Fournier forgeries are ubiquitous when it comes to the Portuguese colonies "Crown" issues of the 19th century. They are found for all of the Portuguese crown colonies that have this issue. Our most recent post looked at the differences between the Genuines and the Fournier forgeries that apply for ALL of the Portuguese colonies EXCEPT Angola. The conclusion was it is not too difficult to differentiate the Genuines from the Fournier forgeries. For review, see bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/09/portuguese-colonies-crown-issues.htmlNow it is Angola's turn. And here indeed it gets more difficult. And there is a surprising twist. Interested? Check out the links above.
|
|
|
Post by gstamps on Oct 11, 2022 9:13:06 GMT
Thanks jkjblue for the new post with Angola. I don't have a specialized catalog for these stamps, so I turned to the Michel catalog. I noticed two essential mentions in differentiating genuine stamps from forged ones. 1. Printing method: genuine â typo Fournier forge â litho 2. Perforation: genuine â all are combined perforations Fournier forge - in line perforation Two of your posts as a Founier forge are obviously perforated in line and any differentiation of drawing differences is additional work. Attention when a re-perforation appears in the corner of the stamp to give the appearance of a combined perforation. In this case, follow the site of jkjblue
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Oct 14, 2022 19:12:55 GMT
Thanks gstamps for the info from the Michel catalog. The Typo/Litho between Genuine/Forgery is helpful. I think the Line Perforation for forgeries is indeed a good sign. I will add it to the blog post. Thanks again!
|
|
|
Post by gstamps on Oct 15, 2022 7:35:23 GMT
Hi jkjblue I am glad that I helped you to complete the information from your excellent website. I started collecting stamps 5-6 years ago when I inherited a stockbook with old stamps. Many of these stamps (about 20%) are fakes and not having catalogs at first, I tried to learn about the way stamps are produced (printing methods, types of paper, types of perforations, types of gum and in what form they were issued - sheets, booklets, coil) I believe that a real collector must have this knowledge (otherwise there is a risk of many fakes in their collections) I found the most complete information in the preface of Michel's specialized catalog for Germany. An example with the type of perforations: I found that most of the fake stamps have line perforation (easier to do) and are lithographed. From my information, all (?) French stamps are combined perforated. When I see a French stamp perforated in line, there is already a 90% probability that it is fake - and I start looking for other information for confirmation: the size of the perforation, drawing, printing method. The printing methods - and their recognition elements - are very well described in the specialized Michel (but not knowing German, I still have a lot of confusion) It would be very necessary for a good connoisseur of German and English to make a translation in âManufacture of stampsâ new board.
|
|
johnamichael
Member
Posts: 74
What I collect: Newfoundland, Early Canada, Weimar Republic/Third Reich-Germany
|
Post by johnamichael on Oct 15, 2022 12:39:08 GMT
What an absolutely amazing blog, bookmarked for sure!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Oct 28, 2022 22:41:36 GMT
1870 Scott 4 25r red "Portuguese Crown" Spiro Forgerybigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/10/angola-1870-77-crown-issue-spiro.htmlFor the Angola 1870-77 issue, forgeries are not uncommon. There are many kinds of forgeries, but the big two are Fournier and Spiro. We have discussed the Fournier forgeries with the two preceding posts... Portuguese Colonies "Crown" Issues: Introduction to the Fournier Forgeries Angola 1870-77 "Crown Issue: Genuine vs Fournier Forgeries Now, let's look at the Spiro forgeries. Actually, reviewing the Angola 1870-77 "Crown" stamps for sale on the 'net, it is not unusual to find Spiro forgeries: in fact, I found more around than the Fournier forgeries. Fortunately, I think they are easier to identify than the Fournier forgeries for Angola. Interested? Check the "Spiro Forgery" 1870-77 Angola "Crown" issues link above.
|
|
stanley64
Member
Posts: 1,986
What I collect: Canada, USA, Netherlands, Portugal & Colonies, Antarctic Territories and anything that catches my eye...
|
Post by stanley64 on Oct 29, 2022 11:37:47 GMT
Great stuff jkjblue ; I have enjoyed your postings in the thread and those on the Portuguese Crown issues, especially. In addition to the various forgeries that you have pointed out, the Portuguese Crown issues (1870-1877) from several of the colonies were re-issued/printed again in 1885 and 1905? as in this example,
I am not sure if that is a topic or path you want to follow, but folks should be aware... Have fun and happy collecting!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Nov 13, 2022 17:06:39 GMT
1870 Scott 4 25r red "Portuguese Crown" Perf 12 1/2; Probable Forgery; Possible Variationbigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/2022/11/angola-1870-77-crown-stamps-genuine.htmlAngola 1870-77 "Crown" stamps: Genuine, Borderline, or Forgery?I've done a deep dive into the Angola 1870-77 "Crown" issue, which has yielded three blog posts to date. Still, after all that work (identifying clear and obvious Genuines, and the Fournier and Spiro forgeries), there are seven stamps in my collection that are yet to be characterized. Is the stamp genuine? Is the stamp "borderline" because it does not meet clearly ALL the criteria for a genuine, or "unknown" because a key clue is obscured (cancel marks)? Is the stamp a forgery? We shall see, I think, how difficult it is to always make a firm determination. I did send five of these stamp scans off to Ron, of Classic Stamp Forgeries website fame, to get his opinion. His interpretation will be acknowledged and included. Previous posts.... Portuguese Colonies "Crown" Issues: Introduction to the Fournier Forgeries Angola 1870-77 "Crown Issue: Genuine vs Fournier Forgeries Angola 1870-77 "Crown Issue": Spiro Forgeries Let's begin! (Click on link above!)
|
|