Maximaphily, traditional and non-traditional

I am the organiser of the Ukraine Project. Since you are the first to express your interest in acquiring the complete set of the 'maxi'cards I will produce, I should like to ask for your advice / opinion on how the stamps should be arranged on the cards.

For the initial 11 countries which have issued special stamps to support Ukraine this year, most countries' varieties will have only one stamp on them, except the Luxembourg variety that will have two stamps side by side on one single card. But since this pair of stamps are of nearly identical design and issued at the same time, this juxtaposition should be of little concern to the most conservative of philatelists.



However, I am unsure how to arrange the Ukrainian varieties I aim at creating. I plan on using the warship stamps F and W (first and second editions, totalising in 4 different stamps), plus the 5 independence stamps Ukraine has issued in the previous year to celebrate Ukraine's national day. If I place one stamp only on one card, it will result in a lot of cards with the same postmark. Hence I lean towards arranging multiple stamps on one card, so that I can avoid the redundancy.

For the moment I am thinking of creating 4 Ukrainian varieties:
- First F + W;
- Second F + W;
- 3 independence stamps issued in the 20th century;
- 2 independence stamps issued in the 21st century.









However, 2 philatelists told me multiple stamps on one card is a bad idea if I were to sell them to philatelists. What do you think about their statement?

As a potential collector, do you also prefer the following arrangement totalising in 9 cards?
- First F;
- First W;
- Second F;
- Second W;
- 1992 independence;
- 1996 independence;
- 2001 independence;
- 2011 independence;
- 2021 independence.

Does it really matter that there are more than one stamp on a card, knowing that the Luxembourg variety will have 2 stamps on one card? And that 'nation' by itself is an abstract concept forbidden by conventional maximaphily -- a rule has already been broken?

I look forward to knowing what you think about this issue. Thank you for your interest in my project.