daveg28
Member
Posts: 1,062
What I collect: U.S., Canada, Great Britain & Commonwealth, France (esp. 1950-80), DDR, USSR
|
Post by daveg28 on Jul 14, 2017 16:35:43 GMT
I'm trying to come up with topics to help me get to my first 50 posts, and here's one I've thought about recently: We all know the issues with removing self-adhesive U.S. stamps from envelopes. They don't want to come off. We can't just soak a pile of stamps off paper in a bowl of water any more. I've had my best luck using Pure Citrus. My question is: is this a U.S. stamp thing, or is it typical of self-adhesive stamps world wide? I've recently started collecting Canada and Great Britain. I have yet to come across any stamps new enough from those countries that I've had to deal with this. I'd like to her everyone's experiences with this. Thanks.
|
|
Anping
Departed
Rest in Peace
Posts: 533
What I collect: Hong Kong, Aden & States & odd stuff I like.
|
Post by Anping on Jul 14, 2017 18:14:27 GMT
The same problem extends to other countries as well. Here in the UK, many Machin definitives are now self adhesive and most of these it would seem, are from booklets. Although I don't collect GB, I have experimented with soaking these using a very similar product to the 'Pure Citrus' you mention. The problem that I have faced is that the stamps usually have to undergo another soaking to try to remove the stickiness that's left. The danger is that these chemicals can wrinkle the paper and/or dilute the ink pigments (it's happened to me). I have read that others use talcum powder to eliminate the sticky residue. I'm not sure this is a sensible thing to do, because not enough time has yet passed to properly measure and monitor the effects of adding chalk like powder to the back of what is a relatively new stamp adhesive innovation.
We just have to look at the effects of stamp storage mounts that used certain plasticisers, which are now, some 30 to 50 years later, showing their destructive properties.
This subject has been discussed at length on other boards, where many different opinions on what to use probably leaves most folk confused. Some collectors make no attempt to soak these off but instead closely cut the stamps from the envelope/piece and just place them in their albums. I personally think this is quite acceptable and is the least destructive.
In some respects, leaving these on cover may be beneficial (the future of postal history collecting), but this is not everybody's bag and does present additional storage and display problems.
|
|
daveg28
Member
Posts: 1,062
What I collect: U.S., Canada, Great Britain & Commonwealth, France (esp. 1950-80), DDR, USSR
|
Post by daveg28 on Jul 14, 2017 19:17:18 GMT
I have not had any trouble using Pure Citrus. I've not had to use a second soaking, either. After the spray softens the glue so I can remove the stamp from the paper, I use a sharp razor blade to gently scrape the remaining adhesive from the back of the stamp. A rub of talc removes and remaining tackiness, and the stamp is ready for the album. Works really well so far for 90% of the stamps I've tried. I'm just wondering how it'll work when I get any Canada or Great Britain stamps to deal with.
|
|
Ryan
Moderator
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,753
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
|
Post by Ryan on Jul 14, 2017 20:23:13 GMT
I actually have quite a bit of fun trying to get modern self-adhesives off of paper. I simply prefer my stamps to be clean & flat and off paper so I've worked a bit at figuring out what techniques are needed to get the stamps off. I had some issues with citrus chemicals that would also fade the reds on some stamps so it wasn't long before I stopped doing things that way. I most commonly use paint thinner now - it's low in flammability (so low that the brand I buy doesn't even have a flammable warning on the front, just a poison warning so you don't drink it). Some self-adhesive stamps wash off without anything other than water (many older US stamps, almost every Canadian stamp, virtually all Dutch & German stamps that I've tried so far). Some never come off in water (old French Marianne definitives, Great Britain Machins, etc.). And not everything comes off with paint thinner - there's one issue of the US flag over porch stamp that doesn't come off, I have some older Tonga stamps that won't come off, one so far from Norfolk Island, etc.. Some come off but need quite a bit of fingernail scraping to get the gum remnants off - Brazil stamps are really bad, it's like a solid wax underneath the gum. There's quite a bit of related chatter here on TSF at an older thread on soaking. (Lots of it just has to do with plain old water-activated soaking, though.) Ryan
|
|
theamateurphilatelist
Member
Keep calm and collect stamps!!
Posts: 317
What I collect: India, Machins, India, Laos, Austria, Russia, Commonwealth omnibuses, Covers, Birds
|
Post by theamateurphilatelist on Jul 16, 2017 14:12:56 GMT
Australian self-adhesives are quite hard to get off paper too. I think US and Australia are the tough ones to get off paper. Some other countries are relatively easier. I have tried quite a few things but really hot (near boiling) water has almost always done the trick with most country's self-adhesives. I have never had enough USA self-adhesives to give it a try on those. For now I just leave them on paper.
|
|
Mark Jochim
Member
Inactive
Collecting, Scanning, Inventorying, Blogging
Posts: 66
What I collect: General Worldwide (from EVERYWHERE!) plus Thailand, Malay Peninsula (Straits Settlements, Malaya, Malaysia, Singapore and States), Pitcairn Islands - Topicals include "Classroom Education", Pioneers of Aviation, Stamps/Postal History on Stamps, FDR - Limited Postal History (Siamese, especially town cancels from the Phuket area)
|
Post by Mark Jochim on Jul 19, 2017 17:21:56 GMT
I've gotten lazy in my old age and I don't even enjoy soaking regular lick-and-stick stamps any more. I've also found that those mailing envelopes to me (stamp dealers, usually) are increasingly lazy about placing stamps in straight lines as many have stamps every which way. Looks like they were affixed in the middle of a tornado!
My current "policy" is that if the cover looks nice (stamps straight and something interesting), I just leave then alone. Modern postal history.... "Regular" stamps are cut and put into plastic bins for the day when I can muster the desire to soak them. ANYTHING self-adhesive that I don't want to keep on cover receives the cut-square approach; I don't need the frustration of trying to soak them if they are going to be difficult. Cut squares were good enough for postal stationary for a long time so I see no problem with that.
|
|
Anping
Departed
Rest in Peace
Posts: 533
What I collect: Hong Kong, Aden & States & odd stuff I like.
|
Post by Anping on Jul 19, 2017 17:53:39 GMT
I've also found that those mailing envelopes to me (stamp dealers, usually) are increasingly lazy about placing stamps in straight lines as many have stamps every which way. Looks like they were affixed in the middle of a tornado! Well, this mailing was from a seller who wasn't lazy about such aesthetics. He instead saved space by using the 'stack and slab' method . CAD$22.90 worth.
|
|
Ryan
Moderator
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,753
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
|
Post by Ryan on Jul 19, 2017 21:14:51 GMT
Well, this mailing was from a seller who wasn't lazy about such aesthetics. He instead saved space by using the 'stack and slab' method . CAD$22.90 worth. The first batch of Icelandic kiloware I ever found (in the pre-internet days, a local stamp shop had a freezer bag full - found a bag of Papua New Guinea too that same day!) had quite a few parcel card cutouts that had the stamps on them the same way. At least those were back in the days of water-activated gum so they soaked off fine. Canadian self-adhesives all soak off fine but the gum is left behind on the piece, which means all of those stacked stamps will leave their gum behind on the stamp underneath. What a mess! My collection still has a bunch of those Icelandic stamps with a small section of CDS cancels on them. Ryan
|
|
Anping
Departed
Rest in Peace
Posts: 533
What I collect: Hong Kong, Aden & States & odd stuff I like.
|
Post by Anping on Jul 19, 2017 22:52:00 GMT
On the flip side of my earlier post, here are three images of stamps removed from a parcel sent to me by sea post from Hong Kong. These are just from three sides of the parcel, there were more on two other sides as well. These were from just one parcel; I was sent a second in the same shipment, again with 5 sides adorned with current commemoratives and MS sheets. The combined weight was 8.5kg (18.8 pounds) and contained four volumes of a recently printed 'tome' about Hong Kong post offices and their cancellations. The guy who sent these (a moderator on another forum) carefully prepared each box and took them into a local post office in Hong Kong. He had the clerk hand cancel each of the 5 sides of the box and he then sealed down cellophane panels (which he had partly attached in advance) over each of them. Then remarkably he repeated this magnificent service for about 23 other members located in different countries. So the poor guy had to lug approximately 451 pounds of books from the main post office back to his apartment. He then had to make up the parcels and then lug them back to different post offices in batches, for posting. In honour of his outstanding service to the philatelic community, I shall NOT be soaking these off. And anyway, some of the miniature sheets (and perhaps some of the commemoratives) will not have seen much valid postal service, so it would be preferable to keep these intact.
|
|
tregeor
Member
Inactive
Posts: 52
What I collect: GB Victoria to Queen Elizabeth pre-decimal and Falkland Islands
|
Post by tregeor on Jul 20, 2017 8:40:28 GMT
I must admit the majority of stamps I've soaked/steamed off are UK stamps that I've received on letters that have not been cancelled by the Post Office. This happens 8 times out of 10! The postal service is quite expensive in the UK so once they're dry I glue them on to envelopes and use them again Hope the Uk postal police aren't reading this but I think if they didn't want people to do it they'd get their act together and CANCELL THE STAMPS
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,914
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
Member is Online
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Jul 21, 2017 6:12:57 GMT
I've gotten lazy in my old age and I don't even enjoy soaking regular lick-and-stick stamps any more.... Well, Mark, for what it's worth, I agree with you. Soaking is not even close to my favorite stamp-collecting activity, but unfortunately, I am still finding it quite necessary. Many of the classic stamps I acquire these days have been mounted in old collections, and they often have multiple hinges on the backs, so I have to soak them to clean them up so that they will lay flat in my album. It can be tedious at times, but in the end, I am generally very happy with the results.
|
|
siem
**Member**
Inactive
Posts: 29
What I collect: Pacific Islands, Baltic states, Netherlands and much more
|
Post by siem on Jul 21, 2017 7:46:29 GMT
I must say that soaking stamps can be a very relaxing job, provided there are no self adhesives in the batch that do not come off normally (like some of the modern UK, most of the modern USA and some of the latest Australia). I have seen many references to Pure Citrus, but I have no idea what it is and if it is available in the Netherlands. Probably not, but what would be more or less the same, and produce the same results?
|
|
Anping
Departed
Rest in Peace
Posts: 533
What I collect: Hong Kong, Aden & States & odd stuff I like.
|
Post by Anping on Jul 21, 2017 8:34:39 GMT
... but what would be more or less the same, and produce the same results? HG Sticker Remover - made by HG International b.v. Damsluisweg 70, 1332 EJ Almere, The Netherlands. EDIT: De-Solv-it - Sticky Stuff remover. UK made.
|
|
siem
**Member**
Inactive
Posts: 29
What I collect: Pacific Islands, Baltic states, Netherlands and much more
|
Post by siem on Jul 21, 2017 8:46:38 GMT
OK, that's funny. I have a bottle of that stuff on the shelf, because of the renovation of our new home. I hope there is something left so I can try it out. Is there a procedure on how to use it?
|
|
Anping
Departed
Rest in Peace
Posts: 533
What I collect: Hong Kong, Aden & States & odd stuff I like.
|
Post by Anping on Jul 21, 2017 9:34:58 GMT
Is there a procedure on how to use it? I have one of those 'clam shell' Phila-Combi-Box Perforation Gauges, made by Lindner. I place the stamp(s) in the watermark tray; apply a few drops and use something like a small bendy glue stick to spread the liquid; and close the box, leaving it to soak for a few minutes. I use this device only because I can close it to prevent evaporation. Any small tray will suffice though, and maybe cover it with a piece of card. Take care with any glue residue as the stamp will still stick to any paper, so a second application may be needed on the gum side, which can then be scraped off.
|
|
zipper
Member
Posts: 2,649
What I collect: Classic GB, QV, France Ceres/Napoleon, Classic U.S., Cinderella & Poster Stamps
|
Post by zipper on Jul 21, 2017 23:45:20 GMT
I don't fancy many new stamps, so I just leave them on the paper and hinge them to my album pages. They're a nuisance, so I give them a minimal amount of attention.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,914
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
Member is Online
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Oct 21, 2017 4:45:57 GMT
... but what would be more or less the same, and produce the same results? HG Sticker Remover - made by HG International b.v. Damsluisweg 70, 1332 EJ Almere, The Netherlands. EDIT: De-Solv-it - Sticky Stuff remover. UK made. Just wanted to add for users in North America, Goo Gone is a citrus-based sticky residue and stain remover, and I used it today for the first time on a stamp, and it seems to have worked very well. I am speaking about the stamp-like wine bottle label that I posted about on the US Cinderella thread. Many thanks to Londonbus1 for letting me know that this label is worth saving. I was able to remove the label after soaking in warm water for about an hour, and then very carefully separating it from the glass surface using a razor blade. After that, the problem was that the back of the stamp was still so sticky that there was no way to flatten it without having it adhere to something else. So, I let it sit for a few hours on its own, and of course, it started to curl. Then I found this thread and started rereading it, and it reminded me that one of the citrus-based chemical products might do the trick, so I pulled out the bottle of Goo Gone. I first tested it on the valueless back label from the bottle, and it removed the residual glue with no problem. So, I carefully applied it the stamp, and I was able to remove all of the remaining adhesive by first using just my fingers with the stamp on a flat surface, and then carefully blotting the excess fluid using a paper towel. Then I put the stamp back into a cold water soak for a couple of minutes, blotted it again, and then pressed it to dry. I will check it again on Sunday and post the results.
|
|
|
Post by dgdecker on Oct 25, 2017 1:50:19 GMT
Can any one advise where or if Goo Gone and Pure Citrus can be purchased in Canada?
I soak older stamps the traditional way but have had mixed results with self adhesive. Will try out some of the hints posted here.
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,385
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Oct 25, 2017 20:47:47 GMT
I hadn't tried to remove modern self-adhesives from paper in the past but that changed today after buying a can of Pure Citrus at the local Walmart. Sprayed the paper backing, spread the liquid around with my finger, then lifted the paper from the stamp. Flipped the stamp over and rubbed the adhesive side in the liquid that remained on the high-gloss card I was using as a backdrop to further soften the adhesive. Placed the stamp face down and used my flexible plastic perf gauge to scrape the adhesive off of the stamp. After several passes with the perf gauge, I rubbed the back of the stamp with a dry napkin to remove any remaining adhesive residue. I used the below stamps in my "experiment" and all ended up without any adhesive residue remaining on their backs (so no need for talc). To answer dgdecker 's question, this article indicates that the Canadian alternative to Pure Citrus is sold under the brand name Zep.
|
|
Londonbus1
Moderator
Cinderella Stamp Club Member 3059
Posts: 5,064
What I collect: Wonderland; 1912 Jubilee International Stamp Exhibition, London ('Ideal' Stamp, ephemera); French Cinderellas with an emphasis on Poster Stamps; Israel and Palestine Cinderellas ; Jewish National Fund Stamps, Labels and Tags; London 2010, A Festival of Stamps (anything); South Africa 1937 Coronation issue of KGVI, singles or bi-lingual pairs.
|
Post by Londonbus1 on Oct 25, 2017 21:25:50 GMT
I hadn't tried to remove modern self-adhesives from paper in the past but that changed today after buying a can of Pure Citrus at the local Walmart. Sprayed the paper backing, spread the liquid around with my finger, then lifted the paper from the stamp. Flipped the stamp over and rubbed the adhesive side in the liquid that remained on the high-gloss card I was using as a backdrop to further soften the adhesive. Placed the stamp face down and used my flexible plastic perf gauge to scrape the adhesive off of the stamp. After several passes with the perf gauge, I rubbed the back of the stamp with a dry napkin to remove any remaining adhesive residue. I used the below stamps in my "experiment" and all ended up without any adhesive residue remaining on their backs (so no need for talc). To answer dgdecker 's question, this article indicates that the Canadian alternative to Pure Citrus is sold under the brand name Zep. Was it worth it ? Well, yes maybe for 4 stamps. But if someone gave you 400 or 4,000 ? No, definitely not. It may appear to be a rather silly question coming from someone who no longer collects Postage stamps but I have to ask.......is it really worth it ? (You can answer on a postcard but with water-activated stamps only !!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2017 21:34:19 GMT
A common very effective product I have used for years to remove gum from jar labels, stickers etc. is Goo-GoneIt contains the d-Limonene, orange extract and the other distillates mentioned in articles I have had no need to use it on self adhesives but it should be an easy to find viable alternative if the ZEP product is not available
|
|
|
Post by dgdecker on Oct 26, 2017 1:59:43 GMT
Thanks all for the info about Goo Gone and ZEP. I will try to find these products and see what success I have.
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,385
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Oct 26, 2017 10:21:30 GMT
If one collects stamps of the self-adhesive era and doesn't want a mixture of different colored backing papers on his or her album pages or stock sheets then my answer would be yes. Processing large numbers of SA stamps likely wouldn't be that much more tedious than processing similar numbers of WAG stamps. Having a stamp room that smells like freshly squeezed oranges is a plus!
|
|
nickmang
Member
Posts: 51
What I collect: ww used definitives and commemoratives
|
Post by nickmang on Feb 6, 2018 12:55:41 GMT
I have not been able to find zep in tha Laval area (Montreal, Canada).
What else would work for those feisty US stamps
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,385
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Feb 6, 2018 13:20:20 GMT
Check out your local Home Hardware -- the company website indicates that they carry Goo Gone.
|
|
philatelia
Member
Captain Jack - my best kiloware find ever!
Posts: 3,655
What I collect: Ireland, Japan, Scandy, USA, Venezuela, Vatican, Bermuda, Austria
|
Post by philatelia on Mar 27, 2020 20:53:59 GMT
Soaking self adhesives ...
|
|
|
Post by david on Dec 29, 2021 14:54:17 GMT
I also noticed that recent stamps from Belgium have a very strong adhesive attached to it which can't be removed by soaking it in water. A friend of mine uses benzene to remove the adhesive and then applies lightly baby powder on the surface. He claims this has good results.
|
|
|
Post by mudgie on Dec 29, 2021 15:30:06 GMT
Regarding British stamps my 2021 Stanley Gibbons catalogue advises that "because the" recent "self-adhesive stamps do not include a water-soluable layer of gum we recommend that used stamps are retained on their backing paper and trimmed with a uniform border of 1-2 mm around the sides taking care not to cut into the perforations". I agree, although I leave a border that includes all of the postmark.
|
|
brightonpete
Departed
Rest in Peace
On a hike at Goodrich-Loomis
Posts: 5,110
|
Post by brightonpete on Dec 30, 2021 12:49:01 GMT
To answer dgdecker 's question, this article indicates that the Canadian alternative to Pure Citrus is sold under the brand name Zep. Wow, first I saw of this! Zep is on my shopping list next time I'm in Trenton. Darn, I was just there yesterday! I'll wait until next year to go...
Thanks to david and mudgie for resurrecting this thread!
Peter
|
|
|
Post by dgdecker on Dec 30, 2021 18:17:48 GMT
To answer dgdecker 's question, this article indicates that the Canadian alternative to Pure Citrus is sold under the brand name Zep. Wow, first I saw of this! Zep is on my shopping list next time I'm in Trenton. Darn, I was just there yesterday! I'll wait until next year to go...
Thanks to david and mudgie for resurrecting this thread!
PeterPeter, what store would you find ZEP? I want to if sold here in Ottawa. David
|
|