stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,903
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Jan 18, 2019 1:25:18 GMT
1952 issue versus 1955 issue from various online catalogues I have the following info photos are either two small to see fine details or in one case B&W 1952 "Local Motives" ( #113) is listed as Perf 13 15 Fr Red Mees & Kratz 1955 "Mines" (#143) is also listed as Perf 13 15 Fr Rose Red Frantzen Images are of a single and a block of 4 Because is has "KRATZ" in lower bottom margin I believe it to be #113, however it doesn't have Mees on it, but rather MAZELIN My concern is compounded by this being found in an envelope with anotherSAAR single and block of 4 from 1955. The 1955 issue has much less value than the 1952 I'd be interested in what others think Thanks!! StainlessB
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 2:12:44 GMT
The 1952 has no inscription below the F and is reddish black The 1953 has an inscription and is reddish black The 1955 has an inscription and is dark rose red Yours are all 1955
BTW - don't get attached to what catalogs value stamps at. In the real world your stamp would be worth 0.10 - 0.15 to an interested collector and less to a dealer.
|
|
stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,903
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Jan 18, 2019 14:18:02 GMT
BTW - don't get attached to what catalogs value stamps at. In the real world your stamp would be worth 0.10 - 0.15 to an interested collector and less to a dealer.
Thanks for the clarification, and I pretty much assumed the MSRP's in the catalogues were whimsical at best. My premise is most of the stamps in the collections I've inherited single digit values
|
|