stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,906
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Feb 5, 2019 2:13:36 GMT
If all my tamps will be in mounts- what are the pro's and cons to having double sided pages over one side only? Especially if the pages are placed in protector sleeves?
I remember the better/premium albums being single sided, while less expensive "stamp books" being on both sides of the page?
|
|
|
Post by dgdecker on Feb 5, 2019 3:10:37 GMT
I tend to think this is personal preference. I usually mount only one side of page as I feel it makes things look less “ cluttered “
i do have some things mounted on both sides for smaller collections. Just make sure a good heavy paper is used. I have made the mistake of using a too light weight paper and it looked terrible.
i do not have the problem of the mounts snagging on opposite pages.
others may have different insights on this.
david
|
|
Ryan
Moderator
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,749
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
|
Post by Ryan on Feb 5, 2019 3:16:01 GMT
The biggest problem with two-sided album pages is solved if you're going to use the protector sleeves. Without the sleeves, the edges of the stamps (or mounts) on one page will catch the edges of the stamps on the other page and they can hook each other every time you open or close the binder or try to turn pages. With your protector sleeves, there won't be the possibility of these edges catching each other.
Ryan
|
|
|
Post by smauggie on Feb 5, 2019 5:34:57 GMT
I am a fan of one-sided for two reasons. First, I like the idea, aesthetically of keeping the gaze the same as you turn the pages instead of going right to left to right, etc. Second, I think it would be more challenging to have all the mounts lie flat on both sides of the page.
|
|
angore
Member
Posts: 5,699
What I collect: WW, focus on British Empire
|
Post by angore on Feb 5, 2019 12:58:05 GMT
I also prefer single sided for reasons mentioned. I like Mystic's US Heirloom album as it uses the left side for information about stamps on the right side. It also seems double side stamp albums tend to have too many pages so adding even more risk.
|
|
renden
Member
Posts: 9,162
What I collect: Canada-USA-France-Lithuania-Austria--Germany-Mauritius-French Colonies in Africa
|
Post by renden on Feb 5, 2019 13:38:23 GMT
With Scott's old Junior Albums and more recent International Albums, you are stuck with mounting stamps on both sides....bummer and it does not function well and a terrific way to "injure" some items, even in mounts. For these I have "glassine" old separators for the US (done when I was younger). If one would use searators for all pages of each albums, the albums would not close , being already too bulky when full of stamps - Solution - separate the big Countries in individual Albums (Custom or Steiner) for me. René
|
|
brightonpete
Departed
Rest in Peace
On a hike at Goodrich-Loomis
Posts: 5,110
|
Post by brightonpete on Feb 5, 2019 14:08:55 GMT
I make up my own pages, and use stiff enough cardstock. I find double-sided printing halves the thickness of the final album and the protector sheets add maybe ¼-½ to the bulk. I prefer double-sided, as I read books. Books are double-sided as well. When there is a large series, nice to have all in one view. That is if the printing of the pages works out that way. So far, I haven't noticed any problems with my method, and will continue doing so.
It all comes down to personal preference. As you have noted, some like it, some not.
|
|
stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,906
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Feb 5, 2019 14:26:35 GMT
thank you everyone for your comments-
the idea of "commentary on the open/left page is an interesting idea
printing on both would allow for anr area for large series stamps or ones with multiple variations. i am trying to decide how I'd like to display my collection as I get everything into one format- and one possibility (where po$$ible) would be to have a mint/unused and a canceled example of each stamp, as well as any inperf/coil/booklet position, pairs, and maybe even a block.... which I realize may sound quite "busy" to some
As I'm still sorting and saoking and catalogueing WW, I still have months to contemplate.
Whether I decide on single sided or double, I'vesettled on a heavier/light card stock and the insertable "page protectors"
so many things to consider!
|
|
firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Feb 5, 2019 14:43:49 GMT
stainlessb Busy ? that is exactly my approach if you look at the funky frog collection in the Canada thread you will see that is the meat of my collection,Mint and used copies as well as a used block and possibly a mint block as well.Varieties and booklets ,hence my use of quadrille pages.
|
|
angore
Member
Posts: 5,699
What I collect: WW, focus on British Empire
|
Post by angore on Feb 5, 2019 16:24:50 GMT
so many things to consider! Yes many options and you may decide to do something else or see or think of something different -- more than once. I did say I preferred right side but I did do a left/right.
|
|
renden
Member
Posts: 9,162
What I collect: Canada-USA-France-Lithuania-Austria--Germany-Mauritius-French Colonies in Africa
|
Post by renden on Feb 5, 2019 20:07:58 GMT
I did say I preferred right side but I did do a left/right. These look good to me even if I do not do it, Angore angoreRené
|
|
coastwatcher
Departed
Rest in Peace
Kentucky, USA
Posts: 506
What I collect: Currently focusing on US and possessions
|
Post by coastwatcher on Feb 7, 2019 3:41:12 GMT
If the paper is heavy enough to support stamps on both sides, the only real downside that I see is the problem of stamps on opposing pages getting hung together. Page protectors will, of course, prevent this but they also add a lot of bulk. I think it mainly comes down to personal preference. I have several single-country albums for the countries that I specialize in and they are all single sided and that’s the way I like it. I also have a set of Minkus Global Master worldwide albums that are double sided and I just don’t like the way they present the stamps. When I look at a collection, I prefer to focus on one page at a time and double sided pages just appear too “busy” for my taste. Of course single sided pages also add bulk over double sided pages but not as much, I don’t believe, as page protectors.
|
|
angore
Member
Posts: 5,699
What I collect: WW, focus on British Empire
|
Post by angore on Feb 7, 2019 16:28:01 GMT
In my example above, they are 2 single sided pages back to back.
|
|
loupy
Member
Back and active, thank you!
Posts: 70
What I collect: US to 2000 with a focus on 720 & 721, WW 1840 - 1930, DDR 5 year workers, Machins, Canada Centennials, Brazil Allegories, Mexico Archiecture & Archaeology 1950 -75, used stamps preffered when possible.
|
Post by loupy on Feb 7, 2019 16:53:52 GMT
I only collect cancelled stamps and hinge them to my pages, one side only, which makes a bulkier binder but protects the stamps from catching on each other when on facing pages. Glassine interleaving or page protectors work well, but add their own bulkiness and weight to a binder. Paper pages are less expensive than either, and have visual properties that I find appealing to my eye. I can live with double the amount of single side pages compared to double sided, foregoing glassine interleaving or sheet protectors. To each, his own.
|
|