|
|
Post by michael on Jul 6, 2021 18:23:28 GMT
Hi, Does anyone have access or a subscription to the NYTimes archive and could kindly help me out? I'm interested in the Madeira 1929 stamp set, and have found an article about these in the March 17th 1929 edition (Section E, page 2).  I believe I can probably buy a 4 week subscription for £2 and then cancel (not sure how easy that would be!) but before I try that I wondered if anyone has access to this article? Michael
|
|
Philatarium
Member 
Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,032 
What I collect: Primarily focused on Japan, but lots of other material catches my eye as well ...
|
Post by Philatarium on Jul 6, 2021 19:51:56 GMT
I should be able to. Let me try ...
|
|
Philatarium
Member
Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,032
What I collect: Primarily focused on Japan, but lots of other material catches my eye as well ...
|
Post by Philatarium on Jul 6, 2021 19:58:33 GMT
That was easier than I thought.
If you can message me through the system here with your email address, I'll send it as a pdf attachment.
|
|
|
|
Post by michael on Jul 6, 2021 20:45:31 GMT
Many thanks, pm sent
|
|
|
|
Post by michael on Jul 6, 2021 21:37:54 GMT
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator 
Posts: 5,911
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Jul 6, 2021 22:01:16 GMT
OK, michael, glad that you were able to get a copy of the article from Dave ( Philatarium).... nice one, Dave!  But now that you have that, Michael, and you have piqued others' curiosity, can you give us an idea of what you may have learned from the article, without violating the sanctity of the archives of the NY Times? |
|
khj
Member
Posts: 1,524
|
Post by khj on Jul 6, 2021 22:19:44 GMT
NYT renewed all their newspaper copyrights back to 1928 (so we just missed the cutoff) and many of their Sunday editions back to 1923.
But he is free to paraphrase or summarize the article -- copyright does not block that.
|
|
|
|
Post by michael on Jul 7, 2021 6:44:37 GMT
I will update the Portugal Ceres thread with 'fair usage' details. I'm sure the NYTimes will be happy with the publicity that anyone reading this will give them.  |
|
