tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,387
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Jun 9, 2014 18:22:48 GMT
Thanks for clearing that up Steve. Is 10-20% off a reasonable amount or do you think I should try for 25%? (I'd ask what you accept on a best offer but I would not think you would want to give that away on a public forum.) Mark, I can't give you a set percentage to offer because sellers all price their items differently. I've made offers on several occasions and have done so based upon comparable sales and the item's condition and grade (for pre-1930s US material, the US Specialized Values by Grade tables are instructive). My general price target is to acquire items at 40% or less of their catalog value, unless it is an item that I really want for the collection. For infrequently seen material, I've submitted bids (not offers) well over CV. In my experience, reasonable offers stand a good chance of acceptance. As a seller who essentially is trying to downsize his duplicates, I'll accept any offer that doesn't result in my losing money on the sale. If I will break even after paying the ebay and paypal fees then I'll accept the offer. If not, I'll counter with a figure that allows me to break even.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 19:56:24 GMT
Jim Forte's covers arrived in the mail today and I was quite pleased with my purchases. So I headed over to his site and found two postcards from Nebraska with 1 cent overprinted stamps. I bought the one below for $10 and 1.50 shipping I'm happy to get a postcard for the 1 cent stamp. Now I'll have to wait to see what's on the other side. 8 Down, 14 to go. I've picked up Kansas 1c, 1.5c, 2c, 3c and 5c ; Neb 1c 1.5c and 2c. I'm going to open up the price window to $20 but hope to get the 3c and 5c Nebraska covers for under 10. Interestingly, I have yet to find the 6c, 7c or 10c overprints on cover, from anywhere, let alone Kansas and Nebraska towns, except for FDC's.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 11,107
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Jun 9, 2014 23:36:48 GMT
When I recently purchased my Van Dam Catalogue, I made a "best offer", which was accepted within seconds, which surprised me, and backs up your comments. All instances before on ebay, my offers were rejected and sometimes took many hours to be relayed.
|
|
Zuzu
Member
Inactive
Self-Proclaimed Black Belt in Google Fu
Posts: 768
|
Post by Zuzu on Jun 9, 2014 23:46:07 GMT
I'm happy to get a postcard for the 1 cent stamp. Now I'll have to wait to see what's on the other side. I had to do a double take on that postcard - it was sent from Elwood, NE, which is my husband's itty-bitty hometown! (His high school graduating class had 11 people.) I wish I could make out something about the sender. It looks to be in German?
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 10, 2014 0:48:38 GMT
Zuzu, When I get the card I can run the text through an online translator and let you know what it says. If the card turns out to be from one of your husband's ancestors, you can have it and I'll look for another example.
|
|
Zuzu
Member
Inactive
Self-Proclaimed Black Belt in Google Fu
Posts: 768
|
Post by Zuzu on Jun 10, 2014 4:15:57 GMT
Because I imagine that to be highly unlikely, I'll take you up on the offer. My hubby gets so annoyed when I see that someone is from Elwood, in the newspaper or similar, and then ask him if he knows that person.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 11, 2014 7:35:20 GMT
I heard a story many years ago of a family taking a vacation to Paris, France. When they got in a cab from the airport to their hotel, the driver recognized their accents as American. He asked them if they knew "so and so". It turned out to be their neighbor!
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 12, 2014 7:13:30 GMT
Okay, this one has me stumped. I don't know too much about RPO covers, or their routes, but I figure that any cover traveling from Kansas City, Mo to Kentucky would not be sent anywhere near Alaska. (Today, with airplanes, one can never tell.) I assume the Seward and Unalaska markings indicates the train at least started somewhere in the frozen north. Perhaps it was on its way to Miami, or someplace warm on the East side of the Mississippi River and just happened to be passing through Kansas City when the postmaster there was looking for a train to carry his mailbags on their way. Given the return address and the destination, I don't suspect this cover was ever in the state of Kansas on its trip so it's not going in my collection, in any case. Anyone have any help with this one?
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 12, 2014 7:45:42 GMT
Well, maybe there is an explanation for this cover. First off, I found the full text of "Mail by Rail" on the internet. It does mention the Seward and Unalaska lines as well as the SS STARR, all in Alaska and traveling as far as Seattle. There were a few covers with similar postmarks in a Schuyler Rumsey sale (a lot of 3 sold for $50). There are also some covers for sale online from Alaska to California destinations with this postmark.
So, here's my guess. Ben Cash was nowhere near Kansas City when he mailed this letter in 1930. He was traveling in Alaska and decided to mail a letter to Elkton, Kentucky. He decided to use his home address on the envelope rather than his traveling stopover in Alaska. This is probably against Post Office regulations but its probably a common practice. If the letter was undeliverable, at least he would know if it ever showed up at his home.
It still may not have traveled through Kansas. It could have traveled further North, passing through Chicago. With sealed mail bags, one can never know. But its probably the strangest cancel anyone will ever see on a Kansas overprint stamped cover. Maybe I will buy it, after all.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 16, 2014 17:35:42 GMT
Well, I got outbid on the Alaska cover. That's fine since it did not fit into my collecting ground rules. I tried to snipe it on EBAY but there were two other snipers with me and my bid didn't even register. Another case of no activity for most of the sale and a flurry in the last few seconds. If EBAY were a true auction firm, they would keep the bidding open for 1 minute after the last bid. It might be far less popular that way. It definitely favors the buyers. (I'm not complaining. I've won my share of snipe bids, too.)
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 16, 2014 17:51:17 GMT
Yesterday was Father's Day. My kids (all grown up but living at home) saw me watching this cover and decided to buy me a present. It went for well above the $10 limit but, hey, it was a gift. It knocked two stamps off the want list. What a fantastic cover! (Pretty nice kids, too.) I think its okay but you can never tell from the scan alone. The b on the 8 cent is raised compared to all the other letters, including the b on the 9 cent, so I don't think someone simply typed on the cover. The stamps are tied (faintly) and all the markings on the back look proper. I'll have this one examined by some friends before the 30 day refund period is up. The seller has 100% feedback with over 8000 reviews. That may not mean the cover is perfect but it does mean the guarantee is good. 10 down. Twelve to go.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 17, 2014 5:46:20 GMT
I found this interesting cover on EBAY tonight and, for $7.50 with shipping, I had to add it to my collection. Another 1 1/2 cent Harding Kansas cover? We already had one. Well, if you look back in this thread, you will notice that Scott 659 was used with a 1/2 Nathan Hale stamp to make up the 2 cent first class rate. This cover is different. Here the 1 1/2 cent stamp is used all by itself, with no postage due. My quick research indicates that the 1 1/2 cent rate was for 3rd class mail. Well, this appears to be 1st class. Assuming the post office didn't make a mistake, I am guessing that the drop rate for intercity mail applied for this letter and the rate was also 1 1/2 cents. I'll have to find a copy of the Postal Guide for the late 20's or early 30's to confirm this. Many versions of the Postal Guide are available, in full text, on Google books.
|
|
Ryan
Moderator
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,754
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
Member is Online
|
Post by Ryan on Jun 17, 2014 7:10:45 GMT
My quick research indicates that the 1 1/2 cent rate was for 3rd class mail. Well, this appears to be 1st class. Assuming the post office didn't make a mistake, I am guessing that the drop rate for intercity mail applied for this letter and the rate was also 1 1/2 cents. I'll have to find a copy of the Postal Guide for the late 20's or early 30's to confirm this. Canada once had a 3rd class rate for greeting cards (up to 1981 at least, as that was the last year that Canada had Christmas stamps with face values below the current letter rate). Perhaps the US had something similar? The cancellation date is in line with a relatively late mailing for a Christmas card. Ryan
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 17, 2014 7:25:25 GMT
Ryan, The EBAY seller, james_wear, has a second cover for sale with the 1 1/2 cent stamp alone. The cover appeared to be down on the left side, so I did not buy it, despite the low price. The cover is also an intercity mailing from Parsons, Kansas and the cds is dated Dec 21, 1932. That also fits in with your hypothesis that this was a Christmas card mailing. On closer examination, this may not be a cut down cover at all. It may just be an odd shape (ie., a Christmas card envelope.) That may also explain the textured envelope on the one I bought.
|
|
I.L.S.
Departed
Rest in Peace
I am in Clearfield, Pa. I love US Classic covers!
Posts: 2,113
|
Post by I.L.S. on Jun 17, 2014 11:53:49 GMT
He has a 2¢ kans. ovpt cover also.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 18, 2014 17:27:49 GMT
My quick research indicates that the 1 1/2 cent rate was for 3rd class mail. Well, this appears to be 1st class. Assuming the post office didn't make a mistake, I am guessing that the drop rate for intercity mail applied for this letter and the rate was also 1 1/2 cents. I'll have to find a copy of the Postal Guide for the late 20's or early 30's to confirm this. Canada once had a 3rd class rate for greeting cards (up to 1981 at least, as that was the last year that Canada had Christmas stamps with face values below the current letter rate). Perhaps the US had something similar? The cancellation date is in line with a relatively late mailing for a Christmas card. Ryan According to the 1898 Postal Guide (the latest one on Google with complete text as an ebook) "General Regulations and Suggestions respecting Foreign Mails for Parcels-Post Regulations. 27. Valentines, unframed Christmas and Easter cards, and other cards of a similar character, passing between friends in small quantities as tokens of esteem, are transmissible in mails dispatched to countries of the Universal Postal Union (except Canada and Mexico, for which US domestic rates apply), at the rate and under the condition applied to 'printed matter'... " So Christmas cards were rated as 3rd class printed matter internationally, and the domestic regulations probably applied in the same manner; hence the 1 1/2 cent rate. mark
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 19, 2014 5:18:46 GMT
Well, I didn't buy either of these items but its nice to finally see them. Two nice covers from Kansas, both registered mail, bearing the 10 cent Monroe (Scott 668). They are $150 each on EBAY. Too rich for my blood.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 19, 2014 5:32:50 GMT
This one got me excited until I realized it was sent from Florida to Oklahoma. I'm not sure why the 15c postage due. Perhaps the clerk thought the stamps weren't valid for postage outside of Kansas. Assuming it was sent airmail, it was still a 1 cent overpayment. The combination with the postage due stamps makes this a great cover. Only a 9.99 starting bid on EBAY. I may buy it anyway; just not for this collection.
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,387
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Jun 19, 2014 14:10:25 GMT
This clip from Postal Bulletin 15041 (July 11, 1929) validates Mark's assumption and indicates that the problem was sufficiently widespread as to require an official "reminder" that the stamps were valid postage in all states. Here is the original guidance on the overprinted stamps that appeared in Postal Bulletin 14963 (April 9, 1929) The only other item regarding the overprints that I found in the Postal Bulletin database was this one informing postmasters that the overprints should not be locally precanceled (PB 14981 of April 30, 1929)
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 19, 2014 19:11:01 GMT
Steve, Very interesting. So all those FDCs from Kansas & Nebraska are bogus. Seeing how well the various postmasters followed these guidelines from Washington, I'm surprised there's not a vast variety of pre-cancelled overprinted stamps. Has anyone seen one, on or off cover? If so, please post it.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 19, 2014 19:31:59 GMT
Okay, I REALLY did not think that was going to be SO EASY. First, the folks in Parsons, Kansas Then other folks in neighboring Hastings, Nebraska And finally, the State of Washington. Washington? REALLY??? I can just imagine the Postmaster General shaking his head. Anyone have a cover example?
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,387
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Jun 19, 2014 20:18:26 GMT
I don't think you can safely draw that conclusion.
From my interpretation of the guidance, covers wouldn't be accepted for stamping and mailing by philatelic agency personnel; however, I'm assuming that stamps purchased and placed by collectors/dealers on May 1, 1929 were laccepted for cancellation by the agency.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 19, 2014 23:39:10 GMT
More precancelled overprints.
Next time I'll remember to check completed listings in addition to items still for sale.
Additional examples of overprinted precancels were found for
Kansas: Salina on 1 cent, Abilene on 3 cent, McPherson on 1 cent
Nebraska: North Platte on 1 1/2 cent, Hastings (inverted) on 4 cent, Blair on 1 1/2 cent, Falls City on 2 cent, Beverly on 1 1/2 cent, Minden on 1 cent, Clay Center on 1 1/2 cent, Clay Center (inverted) on 3 cent and an entire sheet of Hastings on 6 cent.
Hopefully these all occurred before the Postmaster General's memo was issued. 1932 was a tough time to be out of work.
I still could not find examples on cover.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 19, 2014 23:59:04 GMT
I don't think you can safely draw that conclusion. From my interpretation of the guidance, covers wouldn't be accepted for stamping and mailing by philatelic agency personnel; however, I'm assuming that stamps purchased and placed by collectors/dealers on May 1, 1929 were laccepted for cancellation by the agency. Steve, Here is why I made that conclusion: 1. The "Agency" referred to is the Washington DC office that traditionally cancelled first day covers. 2. Item 2 states that " no official first day of sale will be designated for any post office supplied with the surcharged stamps" Thus, the May 1st mailing within the states of Kansas and Nebraska were not FDCs. At best, the April 15 covers were EKU's. 3. Item 4 says the stamps will be sold by the Agency for stamp collectors on May 1st but the agency will not accept collector's FD covers for stamping and mailing. This seems to imply that they would accept stamped covers for mailing on May 1 if, and only if, the covers were pre-stamped (or the memo would have said "stamping or mailing".). While this is in complete agreement with what you said, it is also in agreement with what I said. The Washington DC covers cancelled on May 1st were the only official FDCs. The ones from Kansas and Nebraska were not. And the April 15 covers from Kansas & Nebraska were EKU's. Of course, collectors are free to collect what they want and pay what they want. And if they want to pay 1000-2000 for a set of May 1, 1929 covers from Kansas or Nebraska, then God bless them. mark
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,387
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Jun 20, 2014 2:09:38 GMT
Interestingly, the Scott Specialized includes what you refer to as EKUs for the Kansas and Nebraska locations (April 15-18) in the FDC listing.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 11,107
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Jun 20, 2014 2:17:24 GMT
Query : Is anyone conversant with William Steiner Pages? His pages list by Sc Number and I was wondering if he has these Nebr. Opts on Page. I looked for Sc669 onwards, but couldn't find them. Thanks.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 11,107
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
|
Post by rod222 on Jun 20, 2014 2:26:23 GMT
Although I am not a US collector, I'd like to chip in.
" no official first day of sale will be designated for any post office supplied with the surcharged stamps"
This would appear to me to suggest whilst FDC could be generated by having them franked 1st May, the directive was indicating that no specific Post Office would be named by the Agency as having "official" location status.
In Australia, FDC's have a specific location, for example, an Australian Lettercard bearing an image of a Falcon, had, amongst others, an official FDC Office, at Falcon Western Australia, this would go hand in glove with Maximaphily.
Could this be the interpretation?
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 23, 2014 21:33:50 GMT
Lifetime supporter, It might be a possible interpretation of the memo, at least by FDC collectors (since the Scott catalog recognizes May 1, 1929 as the official date from any post office in the state) but there is certainly some doubt to this. Item 2 states "No official first date of sale will be designated for any post office supplied with the surcharged stamps."
For your interpretation, I would have stated the sentence as "No post office will be designated as the site of the official first date of sale" but this is based on how we tend to phrase things today. One would have to look at other memoranda of the times to best interpret what the PO department meant back in 1929. The subject of the Post Office's sentence seems to be the first date of sale and not the location.
---
I was able to pick up that double 8 cent franked postage due cover for the starting bid of 9.99. I'll present the cover as "confusion by other post offices as to whether the overprinted stamps were valid for use in other states." Since the origin was not Kansas, it doesn't count in my tally, whic remains at 10 out of 22.
-----
The German postcard arrived. It is a very nice Easter greeting card, which I will post in about a week [I'm having hardware problems with my XP desktop so I'm replacing it with a new Windows 7 desktop and it will take some time to get my software & files transferred to the new unit. My laptop does not have the capability of running my printer/scanner or photo tools.]
----
A few more 2 cent regular postage Kansas covers showed up on ebay but nothing too exciting, except for a nice advertising cover at 24.95.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 24, 2014 4:57:43 GMT
Well, I'm not quite sure how to characterize these covers. They were cancelled on May 1, 1929 but in Kansas City, Mo. They have first flight cachets so they are definitely first flight covers. Both represent overpayment of the standard air mail rate of 5 cents and they are both philatelic covers. So why buy them? (answer below) First, Scott 665 on cover and, second, Scott 666 on cover For a lot of reasons they do not below in this collection. But I bought them for 1 very good reason. The ebay seller wanted only 2.99 each, postpaid. (Yes, I did check his other items to see if there were any more from the set. There were not.)
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 24, 2014 6:56:40 GMT
I took another look at the two first flight covers again and did a double take. Despite the cachet on both envelopes that clearly states the first flights were from Kansas City, Missouri, the postmarks clearly say Kansas City, Kansas. That makes these covers "true" first day covers from Kansas. While still not belonging in the collection, it makes them an incredible buy on EBAY.
|
|