mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 7:01:34 GMT
I am thinking about putting together a small collection of covers showing the Kansas and Nebraska overprints properly used on covers. Not First Day Covers. Not from Kansas, Nebraska or certainly not from Washington DC. (Not that there's anything wrong with that but I cannot believe that creating FDCs was the whole point to the issue of these stamps; even if this turns out to be their primary use.) The Post Office's plan to cut down on stolen stamp use by overprinting the 1920 regular series was a disaster. The approximate "Year's supply" lasted a whole lot longer and was (fortunately) not followed up with other states. A quick trip to EBAY showed me how difficult this is going to be. Most of the available covers are FDCs and the cost of a set easily exceeds $1500. Sets from Washington DC are pricey, too. Eliminating FDCs and second day of use covers that are clearly philatelic and someone's attempt to make some money even though he messed up by 24 hours (today he would have had a 45 day grace period), I found a total of 5 covers for sale. And that includes a cover with a stamp posted from Cleveland! This project is going to take some time, but that's what makes stamp collecting fun. The Scott catalog is of little help. They don't list the value of these stamps on cover. So for now, I'll self impose a $10 limit and see what I can do. I managed to buy the following postcard for only $6, including shipping. The CDS isn't clear but the card was definitely mailed in Oakhill, Kansas. Only 21 more to go. Anyone have any of these rarities that they are willing to share?
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 7:06:36 GMT
Here's the other side of the card. A great birthday greeting.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 7:41:01 GMT
Okay, I'll admit I was tempted with this cover. Kansas City, Mo is not quite in Kansas but (1) the use of the 1 1/2 cent Harding is going to be hard to find, (2) the 5 cent airmail rate was properly applied, and (3) the plane flew over Kansas on its way to Vancouver. Still the cover was slightly over my budget (9.95 + 2.00 shipping) but it would have covered two listings. It is a nice cover and I may end up buying it, but not for this collection.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 7:47:57 GMT
Okay, well maybe the 1 1/2 stamp won;t be too hard to find. Here is a Nebraska usage that just cost me $8 including shipping. I think the sender overpaid by a penny but its a nice cover, even with the stamps poorly centered.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 8:37:50 GMT
Well, the Kansas City cover definitely does not belong in my collection. I thought that, maybe, the KC post office would be included by the Post Office Department in Washington because of the larger sales in that city and the likelihood that people would carry the stamps over the river and use them in Kansas (lots of commuters probably lived in Kansas but worked in Kansas City, Mo.)
Then I found this.
"Every Post Office in Kansas and Nebraska received overprinted stamps except for those in Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, Omaha, and Lincoln: in these larger cities, security at post offices was considered adequate; accordingly, the use of overprinted stamps was deemed necessary only in small, usually rural, post offices."
So, even though some of the overprinted stamps were used in these larger cities, they will not find a place in my collection.
I probably need to worry about fake overprints, too since another site claimed that about 60% of the used stamps are fakes. The problem here is that an EBAY seller is not going to want to examine their stamps for fake overprints. Hopefully the $10 limit will keep me somewhat protected. (I'm going to have to relax this limit if I want to get the higher valued stamps on cover so I will need to protect myself from fakes. Any ideas?)
|
|
I.L.S.
Departed
Rest in Peace
I am in Clearfield, Pa. I love US Classic covers!
Posts: 2,113
|
Post by I.L.S. on May 30, 2014 10:37:36 GMT
Great topic! I only have very few of these in my collection (like 5?) and to find one legitimately used on cover is massively harder than it seems. I have seem them both cancelled like shown above or uncancelled like a pre-cancel.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 18:19:59 GMT
Here is a nice 2c Kansas used in period. The EBAY seller wanted 12.50, or best offer and accepted my offer of $10. This kept me in budget. Three down, 19 to go.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 20:03:45 GMT
There's more sellers out there than EBAY. Unfortunately BidStart had no non-FDC covers on their site. Jim Forte Postal History had this one for only $10. I guess the Harding wasn't going to be too hard to find. Jim had 4 of these, all mailed to the same addressee. the nicest one was from Topeka, which is now strictly off limits. This was the second nicest, based on centering. Its probably a philatelic use (why would a corner cover from Newton be sent to Newton from Independence?) I suspect the addressee was collecting postmarks. Still, the usage is correct and the cover is clean. 4 down 18 to go
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 30, 2014 20:13:19 GMT
Okay, it was bound to happen. The $10 limit was broken. And on the most common variety! The 2 cent Washington overprinted Nebraska. Jim had this for $15. He has several others for the allowed $10 but I chose this one over all the rest. It was $15. Who among you would have turned this one down? I did turn down a $75 cover with a 5 cent Roosevelt to Sweden. It was a nice foreign usage but far too expensive, for now. The 5 cent airmail rate in the US should make this stamp relatively easy to find. Five down 17 to go.
|
|
I.L.S.
Departed
Rest in Peace
I am in Clearfield, Pa. I love US Classic covers!
Posts: 2,113
|
Post by I.L.S. on May 31, 2014 9:14:26 GMT
Not I! I probably would have snapped that up too so Congrats on your new acquisition! I also really like the bi-colourd corner card advert. Looks sharp too! Personally I try to avoid the legal size covers just for storage reasons.
|
|
Ryan
Moderator
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,754
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
Member is Online
|
Post by Ryan on May 31, 2014 11:15:09 GMT
I probably need to worry about fake overprints, too since another site claimed that about 60% of the used stamps are fakes. Do you have tips on how to spot used fakes? Mint stamps are easy to figure out by counting the gum breaker ridges on the back, but what do you do for used stamps? I can probably spot typewriter fakes, but beyond that I wouldn't have much of an idea. Ryan
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on May 31, 2014 18:41:45 GMT
Ryan, My initial thoughts on spotting fakes on cover is to feel the stamp carefully with a very clean finger (or use a strong light and a magnifying glass). The overprint should have been applied by a printing plate on the rotary press so the pressure on the stamp would be uniform and the ink may be slightly raised (since it filled the indentations in the plate, and since the stamp ink might prevent some absorption of the black ink).
Typewriter keys force the ink from a ribbon onto paper using raised characters which leave indentations. So, another possibility is to look for indentations inside the cover (it would take a pretty strong typewriter to leave an indentation on the back of the cover through 3 layers of paper) but that may not work too well. The two layers of paper (stamp + envelope) may have spread out the pressure of the keys or the envelope may be sealed. Also, if I were a faker, I would try putting some heavy cardstock inside the cover to prevent the indentations, or try using a good quality ink jet printer.
If I do find a fake on a cover I buy on EBAY, I'm going to have a hard time convincing the seller its bad and getting a refund. Hence the $10 limit. If Jim Forte's cover is bad, it will be easier getting a refund from a dealer. The best protection is probably buying from a seller with lots of positive feedback, particularly one with 100%. They will generally bend over backwards to maintain their ratings.
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,387
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Jun 1, 2014 0:44:53 GMT
In his book How to Detect Damaged, Altered, and Repaired Stamps, Paul W. Schmid offers a few things to look for in used stamps: - Genuine overprints never appear impressed into the stamp
- Genuine Kansas and Nebraska overprints measure about 9.25 and 9.0 mm, respectively
- Details of overprint spacing, serifs, and alignment can be compared to genuine overprints
- Genuine overprints exist only on the 1929 shades of the perforated 10.5x11 set and in most values the differences in color are considerable when compared to other printings.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 1, 2014 5:34:49 GMT
Thanks Steve I'm going to have to make up a digital set of genuine markers for overprints so I can examine the stamps closely BEFORE I buy the covers.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 1, 2014 5:54:25 GMT
No luck tonight on EBAY. Lots of new covers listed but all failed my collection "entrance exam" 1. A 5c airmail cover from Salina, Ks to Denver dated 1931 with a Roosevelt stamp overprinted Nebr. 2. A cover with a South Spencer RPO cds to Omaha Neb with a 1 cent Kans. and a 2 cent Nebr. 3. A 1933 Grand Island Nebr with a 9 cent Jefferson overprinted Kans. 4. A 5c Kans Roosevelt mailed from Newark NJ to Kansas
There were also a couple of FDCs and a few 2 cent Nebraska covers , which I already have, that were well beyond the $10 limit. Its a shame that #3 used the wrong state stamp. A 9 cent cover would have been nice (although I wonder if the postage charge was correct.)
|
|
Ryan
Moderator
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,754
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
Member is Online
|
Post by Ryan on Jun 1, 2014 10:05:20 GMT
Grand Island is Zuzu's territory - she might be interested in that one. Ryan
|
|
Zuzu
Member
Inactive
Self-Proclaimed Black Belt in Google Fu
Posts: 768
|
Post by Zuzu on Jun 1, 2014 18:41:42 GMT
Thanks for the tag, Ryan. Indeed, I am a native Islander. I love Nebraska covers and postcards, so I am greatly enjoying this thread!
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 1, 2014 23:32:28 GMT
Hi Zuzu, Here's the cover #3 I mentioned. It's on EBAY under the listing "667 (9c Kans) on FF Cover NE to IL w GAS & ELECTRIC APPLIANCE Ad" as a Buy it now for $24.95 or best offer, The cover is very nice, except for the mismatch on the stamp.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 2, 2014 7:23:45 GMT
Okay, I finally get it. I see a lot of covers with these stamps addressed TO (and not FROM) Kansas and Nebraska. Mainly event covers like Air Shows (popular in the 1930s) and airport dedication covers. But the covers are from Cleveland, Newark NJ, Denver etc. The post offices just didn't sell these stamps in those places, did they?
Like I said, the light finally turned on. Collectors in Kansas and Nebraska prepared those covers. They sat down, addressed those cover to themselves, either at the shows or at home, got them to the postmaster hosting the event and had them mailed back to their homes. Just like when I prepared addressed First Day Covers as a kid. And they thought, "Let's use a stamp that means something to me. Perhaps one that is overprinted with my home state." Not realizing that they were creating a near impossibility and an incongruous use.
Anyway, these are all clearly Philatelic uses. I've excluded them because they weren't cancelled in their home states. Now I have a second reason to exclude them as well (No philatelic covers allowed.) Well, I'm going to modify that rule and accept Philatelic covers, but not FDCs, used within the proper states. After all, an Airport dedication cover from Nebraska could easily be properly franked with a Nebraska overprinted stamp. I'm not sure that this will net me any additional covers but at least I better understand what I'm finding in the marketplace. (And I feel better about the Kansas 1 1/2 cent Harding overprint cover and the Independence to Newton cover; the stamps were properly used even if they were Philatelic items.)
[All this being said, I still don't understand the Grand Island, Nebraska cover above that was mailed to Illinois. Why would someone use a Kansas overprint stamp on this cover?]
|
|
rogo
Member
Inactive
Posts: 167
|
Post by rogo on Jun 4, 2014 23:24:00 GMT
Ryan, My initial thoughts on spotting fakes on cover is to feel the stamp carefully with a very clean finger (or use a strong light and a magnifying glass). The overprint should have been applied by a printing plate on the rotary press so the pressure on the stamp would be uniform and the ink may be slightly raised (since it filled the indentations in the plate, and since the stamp ink might prevent some absorption of the black ink). Typewriter keys force the ink from a ribbon onto paper using raised characters which leave indentations. So, another possibility is to look for indentations inside the cover (it would take a pretty strong typewriter to leave an indentation on the back of the cover through 3 layers of paper) but that may not work too well. The two layers of paper (stamp + envelope) may have spread out the pressure of the keys or the envelope may be sealed. Also, if I were a faker, I would try putting some heavy cardstock inside the cover to prevent the indentations, or try using a good quality ink jet printer. Again Mark I applaude your niche catagory..... I love it
One thing to think about........ A fake overprint may not have been created on the cover. May have been a shady character (or two) finding a hoarde of unused stamps and creating covers.....You must know as well as anybody there are a few clowns (polite term) that have the ability to fake a postmark quite well. The $$ limit is an excellent idea.
You might want to try www.buckacover.com/ I've gotten some great deals here, even in the premium section
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 2:44:53 GMT
Well, no luck at buckacover for this topic but I definitely saw some others that makes the site worth a longer look. I'm finding the Kansas covers greatly outweigh the Nebraska ones (about 2:1). Not sure why this would be so. The production records should bear this out, since the Post Office decided to overprints about a year's worth of stamps for both states.
Yes, interestingly, the Scott Specialized catalog comes through with the answer to this. While I would not call these overprints commemorative stamps, the Scott publishers apparently did (or they simply put the information where it could be found). Page 533 of my 2012 edition (Sorry, Scott, I can't afford a new one every year) has this information (somewhat rounded off).
1 Cent: 13M Kans, 8M Neb; 1 1/2 Cent: 8M for each; 2 Cent: 87M Kan, 73 M Neb; 3 Cent: 2.5M (K), 2.1M (N); 4 Cent: 2.3M (K), 1.6M (N); 5 Cent: 2.7M (K), 1.8M (N); 6 Cent: 1.5M (K), 1M (N); 7 Cent: 1.3M (K), 0.85M (N); 8 Cent: 1.5M for each; 9 Cent: 1.1M (K), 0.5M (N); 10 Cent: 2.8M (K), 1.9M (N)
The production runs are all higher for Kansas but this doesn't tell the complete story. For example, why is the mint value for the 8 cent Kansas so high? Why is the mint value for the 10 cent Nebraska ($100) so much more than the 9 cent value ($40) or the 10 cent Kansas ($25)? Why isn't the 9 cent Nebraska the rarest stamp? The answers to these questions isn't easy and also includes save rates, centering, etc. but 1 thing I know - the market values are always right. Scott 666 is a relative rarity in mint condition because millions of collectors and dealers have demonstrated this in millions of transactions over the years. The Scott catalog values are just a reflection of these transactions.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 2:52:48 GMT
Well, back to covers...finally. I added Scott 661 to the collection. A nice registration cover. Is the postage correct at 21 cents? It must be. The Beloit PO would not get this wrong. Too bad they didn't use higher values. Maybe they didn't have any. Not the prettiest cover but one I'm happy to buy. 6 down and 16 to go. I wonder why the 1 cent Nebraska is so hard to find. Well, patience is needed. It's only been a few weeks.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 3:07:08 GMT
I'll be honest. That 661 cover was more than $10. The seller wanted quite a bit more but did state that a Best Offer would be considered. When I see this I immediately think of saving 10-20%. Anyway, I made an offer a few bucks lower and the seller immediately agreed. That certainly shocked me. Was he online and waiting for my offer? Well, he was online. And he responded faster than some snipes I've posted at the end of an auction. It made me think I could have offered less. No general rule of thumb here, but I would be interested in hearing what others bid in these situations. How much is too much? How little is too little? I've had counter-offers in the past and some bargaining is fun but you do run the risk that someone else will enter the picture and agree to the "buy it now" price and, then, the item is gone.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 3:20:58 GMT
Well, the 1 year expectation of the Post Office, when overprinting this series, isn't holding up. A three year window of use (1929-1932) is more what I'm finding. The Washington Bicentennials in 1932 pretty much replaced this series. The Arbor Day 2 cents (Scott 717 issued in April 1932) also limited the use of the 2 cent stamp on regular mail. The Olympic Games 5 cent stamp, as seen on the registration cover, was popular and was replacing the 5 cent Roosevelt for use as an airmail stamp but this was, generally, a small use for both 5 cent stamps. C11 and C12 are much more common on airmail covers of the day.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 3:35:22 GMT
Rogo raises an interesting point about fakers creating valuable covers. Used stamps from this series are common. Covers aren't. But covers from the early 1930's are easy to find. So, if I were a dishonest fellow, I could take a cheap cover, remove a cheap stamp or two and replace them with Kansas or Nebraska overprinted stamps of the same denomination and greatly increase the value of the cover. Of course, some care would be needed to match the cancellation on the cover, but the wavy lines are somewhat generic so this isn't too difficult. Not a great way to make a living but it could be profitable. Again, trusted dealers (Thanks, EBAY feedback) is all you can fall back on. The bottom line is that stamp collecting is supposed to be fun. So do it to have fun, and not to make a killing profit off an unsuspecting collector.
|
|
I.L.S.
Departed
Rest in Peace
I am in Clearfield, Pa. I love US Classic covers!
Posts: 2,113
|
Post by I.L.S. on Jun 9, 2014 10:31:41 GMT
Wow You seem to be doing rather well at acquiring these as I have trouble finding singles in that price bracket for some reason? I've seen these marked like the seller thinks they're gold or something?? lol Anyways Great stuff as always!
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,387
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Jun 9, 2014 11:30:30 GMT
... The seller wanted quite a bit more but did state that a Best Offer would be considered. When I see this I immediately think of saving 10-20%. Anyway, I made an offer a few bucks lower and the seller immediately agreed. That certainly shocked me. Was he online and waiting for my offer? Well, he was online. And he responded faster than some snipes I've posted at the end of an auction... When posting a listing with the "Best Offer" option, the seller can establish a minimum price level for automatic acceptance. Offers falling at or above that threshhold are accepted without any further seller involvement. Offers below the seller-established threshhold amount are forwarded to the seller for his/her consideration. I'm always amazed when my listings sell at the asking price, even though I've indicated I'll consider "Best Offers" -- in my mind "Best Offer" is an invitation to negotiate.
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 17:19:55 GMT
Thanks for clearing that up Steve. Is 10-20% off a reasonable amount or do you think I should try for 25%? (I'd ask what you accept on a best offer but I would not think you would want to give that away on a public forum.)
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 17:28:48 GMT
Well, here's another nice cover I picked up this morning. At 9.99 it made my price limit with something to spare. The 5 cent stamp paid the airmail rate so this is a nice usage for this cover to Germany. I don't know if the international rate was 10 cents or perhaps this was a double weight cover. The Fort Riley cancellation shows this was used only a few months after the stamp was issued. Seven down, 15 to go
|
|
mark
Member
Inactive
Posts: 89
|
Post by mark on Jun 9, 2014 18:17:36 GMT
Here's another cover from the same event as the 5 cent double rated cover to Germany. The 5 cent postage is correct for airmail within the lower 48. I already have a cover with Scott 658 so I'll let this one go. While the lower 1 cent stamp is barely tied by the upper CDS, I guess the clerk made sure it couldn't be re-used by applying the second, killer cancel. It is an interesting cover because it shows two different types of killers. Now, I thought the wavy line cancel was a "machine" cancel. (I envision a small device that sat on the counter and was hand operated because electricity was not available everywhere in the country in 1930.) The lower cancel looks more like a handstamp, but that may just be due to the uneven inking. The clerk did a nice job of hitting the stamp but avoiding both the cachet and the address.
|
|