|
Post by jkjblue on Apr 10, 2017 19:16:51 GMT
Don't copy image and then paste.
Do you have a "Copy image address" option? Then you will paste the "image address" using the Insert Image button here.
At least that works for my blogger images - and my images are stored in Google photos.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 10, 2017 19:24:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by PostmasterGS on Apr 10, 2017 19:56:48 GMT
Google Photos doesn't support direct embedding of photos hosted on the service. There are third-party services (example here) that convert the Google Photos share links to embeddable code. I've never used any of these services as I don't use Google Photos, so use at your own risk.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 10, 2017 20:29:35 GMT
Google Photos doesn't support direct embedding of photos hosted on the service. There are third-party services (example here) that convert the Google Photos share links to embeddable code. I've never used any of these services as I don't use Google Photos, so use at your own risk. Thanks, Postmaster, that would seem to explain the problem. I think I will look back through some of @falshung's other suggestions and try to find a site that offers all of the services in one place. Thanks again!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Apr 11, 2017 1:08:16 GMT
Well, I have a solution. Become a blogger! Not really, but it would work the same. 1) Sign up for blogspot.com blogger acct. (free) (Part of Google) 2) Call your blog the neverending uploading of stamp images blog, or something to that effect. 3) Uploaded your scanned image(s) to your neverending blog post. (The images are actually stored in google photos) 4) Update the blog post. 4) When you click on an image in your blog, it will give you the option of "copy image address" 5) This is what you will get... Imaged @ 1200Cost: essentially nothing.
|
|
angore
Member
Posts: 5,697
What I collect: WW, focus on British Empire
|
Post by angore on Apr 11, 2017 1:20:05 GMT
Test shared from Google Photos. It seems to work for me. I did not use share feature since it gives you access to entire gallery but had image view and then copied link address. I use smug mug for other photos but may use this method for stamp images.
|
|
Lila Schatten
Member
Inactive
Mainly U.S, Germany, and Japan, but my motto is "ooh, pretty. Mine." hence all the binders of stamps
Posts: 108
|
Post by Lila Schatten on Apr 11, 2017 2:55:20 GMT
Well, I have a solution. Become a blogger! Not really, but it would work the same. Sign up for blogspot.com blogger acct. (free) (Part of Google) Cost: essentially nothing. This is actually a great idea! I have used blogger a lot for school projects and such, and it is pretty easy to get a hang of. In my experience uploads DO take a little longer. However, since you don't need to wrestle with Photobucket for half an hour you will still save a lot of time.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 11, 2017 5:26:29 GMT
Test shared from Google Photos. It seems to work for me. I did not use share feature since it gives you access to entire gallery but had image view and then copied link address. I use smug mug for other photos but may use this method for stamp images. Well, I can't speak for anyone else, Al, but I cannot see the image that you posted. All I can see on TSF in your post is what looks like a grayed-out version of a "Do Not Enter" or "Wrong Way" road sign, which is a gray circle with a white rectangle in the middle of it. I assume that that is not what you posted.....
|
|
|
Post by classicalstamps on Apr 11, 2017 7:34:45 GMT
I use Dropbox. Extremely easy. You can get a free account. No problems whatsoever.
|
|
Ryan
Moderator
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,749
What I collect: If I have a catalogue for it, I collect it. And I have many catalogues ....
|
Post by Ryan on Apr 11, 2017 9:39:03 GMT
I'm familiar with Google Photos as it is my image hosting choice. I find it fairly straightforward - there must be some small detail that's going haywire with your attempts at posting. First, when you're looking at your image in Google Photos, right-click on the image and that will bring up a context menu. You need to choose "Copy image address" (or whatever similar command, various versions of Windows might have various ways of saying the same thing - if you're on a Mac, you'll need to get help from somebody other than me!). This will paste the image's Google Photos URL on your clipboard. Now you need to put that URL into your post here on TSF. When you're posting images stored on Google Photos here, you need to choose the blue "Reply" button on the right side of the posting area - if you don't, you're stuck in the "Quick Reply" mode and you aren't given the option of posting images, videos, URLs, etc. Google Photos URLs don't have a ".jpg" at the end so the forum's ProBoards software doesn't know that you have an image. You have to click the blue "Reply" button in order to get to the icons that allow you to specify image URL locations. Click on the little "Insert Image" icon, 3rd from left in the pile of icons at the far right. It looks sort of like a landscape in a picture frame - hovering your cursor over those icons should bring up alternate text that tells you what the icons do (in order from the left, you have "Link", "Email", "Insert Image", "Insert Video", etc.). This brings up a small dialog box that you can use to insert your image URL. Click inside the "Image URL:" text box to get the cursor in the right place (I also get rid of the "http://" that is pre-written there, if you don't you might manage to ruin the URL syntax). Then right-click to bring up a context menu and choose "Paste". This will put the Google Photos URL currently on your clipboard into that text box. Then click on the "Insert Image" button (or just hit Enter) and the ProBoards software will figure out the correct codes to treat your URL as an image location. The image will then show up. The image is going to appear where you had the cursor when you clicked on the "Insert Image" icon. I habitually enter three blank lines and then put my cursor on the middle one before I insert the image - that gives me a blank line above and below my image and makes it easy to continue typing afterward. One final thing - sometimes you might accidentally click on the "Preview" or "BBCode" links at the bottom of the Reply window. This just allows you to have a look at the codes that the ProBoards software uses to make your images (or videos, or URL links, or whatever) show up properly. If your picture disappears and is replaced by an ugly string of characters, that means you clicked on the "BBCode" link and you need to choose "Preview" to get back to seeing pretty pictures again. Ryan
|
|
Londonbus1
Moderator
Cinderella Stamp Club Member 3059
Posts: 5,064
What I collect: Wonderland; 1912 Jubilee International Stamp Exhibition, London ('Ideal' Stamp, ephemera); French Cinderellas with an emphasis on Poster Stamps; Israel and Palestine Cinderellas ; Jewish National Fund Stamps, Labels and Tags; London 2010, A Festival of Stamps (anything); South Africa 1937 Coronation issue of KGVI, singles or bi-lingual pairs.
Member is Online
|
Post by Londonbus1 on Apr 11, 2017 10:04:34 GMT
Test shared from Google Photos. It seems to work for me. I did not use share feature since it gives you access to entire gallery but had image view and then copied link address. I use smug mug for other photos but may use this method for stamp images. Well, I can't speak for anyone else, Al, but I cannot see the image that you posted. All I can see on TSF in your post is what looks like a grayed-out version of a "Do Not Enter" or "Wrong Way" road sign, which is a gray circle with a white rectangle in the middle of it. I assume that that is not what you posted..... All I see is a small box with an 'x' in the middle.
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,385
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Apr 11, 2017 13:21:10 GMT
Test shared from Google Photos. It seems to work for me. I did not use share feature since it gives you access to entire gallery but had image view and then copied link address. I use smug mug for other photos but may use this method for stamp images. Several of us are unable to see anything other than a "do not enter" icon so I'd recommend you reconsider your approach. When I was using Imageshack several years ago, some members were only able to see a frog's image and that prompted my switch to Photobucket.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 11, 2017 15:35:35 GMT
I'm familiar with Google Photos as it is my image hosting choice. I find it fairly straightforward - there must be some small detail that's going haywire with your attempts at posting. Ryan, thank you very much for your detailed, step-by-step post. I agree with your assessment that "there must be some small detail" that I am missing, possibly a setting somewhere which is resulting in this problem. The process I am following is exactly what you have outlined. The only difference I could detect is that when I right-click on the image it offers "Copy link address" rather than "Copy image address" as in your example. I will poke around a little on Google to see if I have missed a setting somewhere. As jkjblue points out, perhaps I need to sign up as a blogger or something. Anyway, thanks for your attempts to help me. At least you could post the image from Google Photos that I could not, so it tells me that I must be pretty close to getting it to work, if I can just find the one thing which is preventing it from succeeding. Chris
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,385
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Apr 11, 2017 18:13:15 GMT
Beryllium Guy , I just tested an upload using Google Photo and it worked so I thought I'd post a description of the steps I followed -- maybe it will help. First, I uploaded an image and this is how it appeared after doing so -- I'll call this the "album view." Next, I double-clicked (left) on the image and got this expanded view. I right-clicked on the expanded image view and selected "Copy image address" from the pop-up box that had appeared. I then clicked on the forum's "Create Post" button and selected the "insert image" button in the menu bar. When the image box opened, I pasted the image address that had been copied from Google Photo into the box. Clicking on the "insert image button yielded the following in my post: Note that if you right-click on the image while in the "album view" you will not get the "copy image address" option -- this might be what is preventing you from posting the image. I hope this helps.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 11, 2017 19:06:48 GMT
All right, Steve ( tomiseksj ), I just followed the process from your tutorial. Are you able to see this image below? It is supposed to be the 1200dpi scan of Albania, Scott #123 with forged overprint. I can actually see the image in the post this time, unlike before.
|
|
Londonbus1
Moderator
Cinderella Stamp Club Member 3059
Posts: 5,064
What I collect: Wonderland; 1912 Jubilee International Stamp Exhibition, London ('Ideal' Stamp, ephemera); French Cinderellas with an emphasis on Poster Stamps; Israel and Palestine Cinderellas ; Jewish National Fund Stamps, Labels and Tags; London 2010, A Festival of Stamps (anything); South Africa 1937 Coronation issue of KGVI, singles or bi-lingual pairs.
Member is Online
|
Post by Londonbus1 on Apr 11, 2017 20:09:52 GMT
All right, Steve ( tomiseksj ), I just followed the process from your tutorial. Are you able to see this image below? It is supposed to be the 1200dpi scan of Albania, Scott #123 with forged overprint. I can actually see the image in the post this time, unlike before. No image here, just the little box with black square and white x.
|
|
Londonbus1
Moderator
Cinderella Stamp Club Member 3059
Posts: 5,064
What I collect: Wonderland; 1912 Jubilee International Stamp Exhibition, London ('Ideal' Stamp, ephemera); French Cinderellas with an emphasis on Poster Stamps; Israel and Palestine Cinderellas ; Jewish National Fund Stamps, Labels and Tags; London 2010, A Festival of Stamps (anything); South Africa 1937 Coronation issue of KGVI, singles or bi-lingual pairs.
Member is Online
|
Post by Londonbus1 on Apr 11, 2017 20:13:04 GMT
All right, Steve ( tomiseksj ), I just followed the process from your tutorial. Are you able to see this image below? It is supposed to be the 1200dpi scan of Albania, Scott #123 with forged overprint. I can actually see the image in the post this time, unlike before. I see the same little boxes from Steve's 2 posts both here and testing. I think I prefer the frog !!
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 11, 2017 20:46:51 GMT
All right, Steve ( tomiseksj ), I just followed the process from your tutorial. Are you able to see this image below? It is supposed to be the 1200dpi scan of Albania, Scott #123 with forged overprint. I can actually see the image in the post this time, unlike before. I see the same little boxes from Steve's 2 posts both here and testing. I think I prefer the frog !! Wow, Michael, I am not sure what's going on, then. Sorry. I thought I finally had it figured out. Maybe it's back to Photobucket for me.... Something strange and inconsistent is going on with this.
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,385
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Apr 11, 2017 21:03:31 GMT
All right, Steve ( tomiseksj ), I just followed the process from your tutorial. Are you able to see this image below? It is supposed to be the 1200dpi scan of Albania, Scott #123 with forged overprint. I can actually see the image in the post this time, unlike before. ... I'm afraid all I can see is the do not enter sign. Are you saving the image as the original size or have you let Google Photos compress the image, if needed (the unlimited storage option)?
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 11, 2017 21:12:58 GMT
All right, Steve ( tomiseksj ), I just followed the process from your tutorial. Are you able to see this image below? It is supposed to be the 1200dpi scan of Albania, Scott #123 with forged overprint. I can actually see the image in the post this time, unlike before. I'm afraid all I can see is the do not enter sign. Are you saving the image as the original size or have you let Google Photos compress the image, if needed (the unlimited storage option)? Well, as I said to Michael, this is both strange and inconsistent. I think I have had enough fooling around with Google Photos. I am ready to try something else. All right, I have followed @falshung's suggestion, and I have opened an account with Postimage. Can you see the 1200dpi scan of Hong Kong, Scott #47 below?
|
|
tomiseksj
Moderator
Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,385
What I collect: Worldwide stamps/covers, Cinderellas, Ohio Prepaid Sales Tax Receipts, U.S. WWII Ration ephemera
|
Post by tomiseksj on Apr 11, 2017 21:31:09 GMT
I can see it!
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 11, 2017 21:38:40 GMT
Great, Steve, thanks! I think I will start using Postimage now, especially for any high-resolution images. As Nelson told me, Postimage seems more user-friendly than Photobucket, and it doesn't have all of those annoying pop-up advertisements, which constantly interrupt me when I am trying to work on the site. Thanks to all who have offered advice and helped me to get my image compression issues resolved!
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Apr 11, 2017 23:16:08 GMT
Beryllium Guy The quality of the scan image of the Hong Kong Scott 47 is difficult to judge, as the stamp itself is well used. Could you post an image scan of a fairly pristine stamp, perhaps engraved and detailed? I want to be assured that Postimage is able to deliver nice images.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2017 23:46:20 GMT
Postimage 600 dpi scanned & uploaded 5 mins ago All my GVI I stamp posts are from PostimageGeneral ones & newsletter are from Imgur
One time ones are from Picpar - the easiest & fastest but no storage My Forgery Blog/Website is WordPress, the program stores the images on my dedicated server in 3 size formats so losing the pictures, which can happen with 3rd party sites, is minimized Photobucket - they compress any high res images None of the ones I use compress, I ran tests on all of them. As a plus they are free and there are no upload limits. Actually I also use an excellent German ( Abload) one (for photography) and a Russian one ( Yandex) but they would have a language issue for most users I'm a little fussy about picture quality and not having all my pics in one place I scan & post everything in JPEG usually 85% quality Saving as a TIF would not make any difference for a forum post other than making the file much bigger. PNG format I use for transparencies like the background shadow images in the newsletter For photography I work in RAW format images
|
|
Londonbus1
Moderator
Cinderella Stamp Club Member 3059
Posts: 5,064
What I collect: Wonderland; 1912 Jubilee International Stamp Exhibition, London ('Ideal' Stamp, ephemera); French Cinderellas with an emphasis on Poster Stamps; Israel and Palestine Cinderellas ; Jewish National Fund Stamps, Labels and Tags; London 2010, A Festival of Stamps (anything); South Africa 1937 Coronation issue of KGVI, singles or bi-lingual pairs.
Member is Online
|
Post by Londonbus1 on Apr 12, 2017 6:16:24 GMT
I'm afraid all I can see is the do not enter sign. Are you saving the image as the original size or have you let Google Photos compress the image, if needed (the unlimited storage option)? Well, as I said to Michael, this is both strange and inconsistent. I think I have had enough fooling around with Google Photos. I am ready to try something else. All right, I have followed @falshung 's suggestion, and I have opened an account with Postimage. Can you see the 1200dpi scan of Hong Kong, Scott #47 below? I can see this one loud and clear !
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 12, 2017 6:28:08 GMT
Beryllium Guy The quality of the scan image of the Hong Kong Scott 47 is difficult to judge, as the stamp itself is well used. Could you post an image scan of a fairly pristine stamp, perhaps engraved and detailed? I want to be assured that PostImage is able to deliver nice images. Thanks for your comments, Big Blue ( jkjblue). Please find a new "pristine" image posted below. How does it look? It happens to be Portugal, Scott #426. It is engraved and has lots of detail. I have scanned it at 1200dpi, using the "optimized for image quality" setting on the scanner, and I used the "do not resize my image" feature on PostImage. Jim or anyone else, please let me know how the image quality looks to you. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by classicalstamps on Apr 12, 2017 9:10:40 GMT
Beryllium Guy I would expect better quality from a PNG scanned in 1200dpi When I download the image and take a closer look: the dimensions are 1106x800. Have you resized it? Anyway, you cannot zoom without the image getting pixelated (it is even pixelated without zooming..) - so something is not right. At 1200 dpi you should be able to clearly see the tiny irregularities on the edges of the perforations - like jkjblue's image above.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 12, 2017 14:41:15 GMT
I want to be assured that PostImage is able to deliver nice images. Thanks for your comments, Big Blue ( jkjblue ). Please find a new "pristine" image posted below. How does it look? .... I used the "do not resize my image" feature on PostImage.Thanks for the comments, classicalstamps. If this latest image doesn't look that good, then I am not sure what more I can do. To answer your question, as I mentioned when I made the last post, I specifically used the "do not resize my image" option on PostImage.
|
|
|
Post by jkjblue on Apr 12, 2017 16:26:12 GMT
Portugal 426 "Battle at Montijo"Scanned @ 1200, jpeg, no compression The problem with scanning is it is both an art and a science. Beryllium Guy - Don't be discouraged, you are heading in the right direction.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Apr 12, 2017 17:16:57 GMT
Scanned @ 1200, jpeg, no compression. The problem with scanning is it is both an art and a science. Beryllium Guy - Don't be discouraged, you are heading in the right direction. Thanks for your comments, Jim. I am trying not to get discouraged, but sometimes it's not so easy. I noticed that in your scan of Portugal #426, the colors seem a lot brighter than in mine. Do you make any adjustments to brightness or contrast when saving the image, or is it something to do with settings on the scanner? By the way, if I use software like Microsoft Office Picture Manager (which is what I use to crop the images) and make changes to the brightness, will that difference remain with the image after uploading to an image-sharing site? I am guessing it will, since the cropping does, but just wondered if you have any experience or comments about that. Here is the same image I posted before, but this time I used "Autocorrect" for brightness and color on Microsoft Office Picture Manager. It looks a bit better to me. How does it look to you?
|
|