salentin
Member 
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506 
|
Post by salentin on Sept 19, 2021 13:09:03 GMT
All 5-year-plan definitives,issued from 1953 till 1955 were reprinted in 1957. The reprints were printed at 20 millions sets each. They were exported and sold mainly abroad. All,except few "slipped through" stamps bear printed date-cancellations of the year 1956. The cancel were placed central on blocs of four,so that single stamps show a quarter of the cancel. All reprints were printed on ungummed paper.So gummed stamps cannot be reprints. The paper of the reprints is smoother than that of the originals.(best seen on the backside)
Of the first set (Scott no.155-171),printed by Litho(graphy) the designs of originals and reprints differ in many details. Wether these are minor,as Scott claims,is a question of opinion.
As I am myself a "novice" DDR-collector and my collection,that I had bought recently,did not contain the reprints,I found out,that they are not so easy to find. They are not attractive for stamp-dealers,because of theirs very low cat.-values and because they can so easily be confused with the originals.
During my attempt to scan the 1953 series,I found that I miss one of the reprints,but will nevertheless show what I have. Talking about cat.-values,Michel lists the 1953 reprints at € 3.- for the set. I have no actual catalogue,what values the originals in used,but in an older issue,the originals were priced used € 110.-,versus € 3.- for the reprints. As no price for originals in c.t.o. was listed,I think they were not sold as such.
original,left stamp,reprint right stamp
upper original,lower reprint
On all originals the A of DEMOKRATISCHE is placed under between the HE of DEUTSCHE while it is further to the right under the E on all reprints. There are many differences in the design as well. On this stamp,the reprint 1 Pfennig value,the twig and leaves left to the 5 are much less shaded and appear to be nearly white.
|
|
stainlessb
Member
qaStaHvIS yIn 'ej chep
Posts: 4,903
What I collect: currently focused on most of western Europe, much of which is spent on France, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain Queen Victoria
|
Post by stainlessb on Sept 19, 2021 13:23:52 GMT
now something else to look for!
|
|
brightonpete
Departed
Rest in Peace
On a hike at Goodrich-Loomis
Posts: 5,110
|
Post by brightonpete on Sept 19, 2021 13:59:24 GMT
Thanks for that salentin. I am trying to see what exactly I have. This well help!
|
|
khj
Member
Posts: 1,524
|
Post by khj on Sept 19, 2021 19:34:13 GMT
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 20, 2021 5:47:32 GMT
original left,reprint right stamp
upper original,lower reprint
On the reprints the distance of D(EUTSCHE) and
D(EMOKRATISCHE)
to the left is smaller than on the originals.
But again the most sure distinction to spot the reprint,is the "A under the E"
|
|
khj
Member
Posts: 1,524
|
Post by khj on Sept 20, 2021 6:34:28 GMT
Talking about cat.-values,Michel lists the 1953 reprints at € 3.- for the set. I have no actual catalogue,what values the originals in used,but in an older issue,the originals were priced used € 110.-,versus € 3.- for the reprints. As no price for originals in c.t.o. was listed,I think they were not sold as such. Michel does provide a CTO price for the 1953 originals in the editions that I have. However, I did notice that Michel does not always provide a set price every year. For example, in my 2005, there is no CTO set price for originals even though all the individual CTO originals are priced. Since the individual CTO prices for the 1953 originals are listed, I will assume that the omission of the set price was simply an editorial oversight.In my 2015 Michel Specialized, the set prices are listed as: €30 for original, genuine postally used €17 for original, CTO €3 for reprint (1957), CTO [EDIT: see 2 posts below for corrected catalog price quote. I jumped back to the wrong page when copying the prices.  ] |
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 20, 2021 8:25:47 GMT
I don´t have the 2005 and the 2015 Michel, but in mine (2002/3) the 1953 litho-set (Mi.nos.362-379,Scott nos.122-36) shows no prices for c.t.o. originals, but for the reprints only.
However the 1953 typo-set (Mi.nos.405-422,Scott nos.187-204) is listed with five columns as: mint,hinged, mint n.h., c.t.o., postally used, and reprints c.t.o.
The Michel Junior 2020 list nos.362-379 as mint,n.h., c.t.o. and reprints c.t.o. However the prices seem to be strange to me: 1.) mint,n.h. € 150.-,what seems O.K. 2.) c.t.o. € 110.-,what looks very high to me,but is the same price as in the 2000/2003 edition for postally used ! 3.) reprints c.t.o. € 3.-,what seems to be O.K.again
Is it possible,that you confused the sets ? I ask,because the € 17.-,you mentioned for c.t.o.,match exactly the price in 2020 Junior for the Mi.nos.405-422 set and those for postally used in Michel 2002/2003 are quite close with € 30.- versus € 25.-. (405-422 is not listsed as postally used in the Junior-cat.)
|
|
khj
Member
Posts: 1,524
|
Post by khj on Sept 20, 2021 15:43:47 GMT
You are correct. When I scrolled back to quote the prices, I jumped to the wrong set, so gave the wrong catalog price quote. Sorry, getting old. However, the set prices for original CTO are listed, even in the 2005. From the 2015 Michel #362-379: €130 for original, genuine postally used €110 for original, CTO €3 for reprint (1957), CTO  |
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 21, 2021 10:48:29 GMT
Obviously a very small difference in prices between postally used and c.t.o. Quiet surprising for me !
original left,reprint right
upper original,lower reprint
On the reprints the distance of D(EUTSCHE) and
D(EMOKRATISCHE)
to the left is smaller than on the originals. In other words,the inscription is bigger.
The leaves left to the "5" are darker and appear less prominent.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 22, 2021 5:04:12 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper original,lower reprint
On the reprints the distance of D(EUTSCHE) and
D(EMOKRATISCHE)
to the left is smaller than on the originals.
In other words,the inscription is bigger.
The centres of the leaves left to the "5" are darker.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 23, 2021 10:57:28 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper original,lower reprint
On the reprints the distance of D(EUTSCHE) and
D(EMOKRATISCHE)
to the left is smaller than on the originals.
The centres of the leaves are darker.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 24, 2021 5:49:21 GMT
left original.right reprint
upper original,lower reprint
The inscription is much bolder on the reprints.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 25, 2021 12:05:37 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper original,lower reprint
The inscription is bigger on the reprints.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 26, 2021 5:34:15 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper original,lower (lying on top of the original) reprint
On the reprints the 6 is further apart from the border-line than on originals. The inscrption is bigger and bolder on the reprints.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 27, 2021 11:23:31 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper original,lower (lying on top of the original) reprint
Inscription slightly larger,the N of WERKTÄTIGEN further away from the border on the reprints.
But again the most sure distinction to spot the reprint,is the "A under the E"
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 28, 2021 11:37:12 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper original,lower (lying on top of the original) reprint
The B of Berlin is closer to the frame on reprints.
upper original,lower reprint
On the reprints the second E of DEUTSCHE and the R of REPUBLIK are closer to the leaf above.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 29, 2021 5:35:12 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper original,lower reprint
On the reprints the second E of DEUTSCHE and the R of REPUBLIK are closer to the leaf above.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Sept 30, 2021 12:44:02 GMT
left original,right reprint
left original,right reprint
The leaf to the right is complete on the reprints,while cut on the originals.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Oct 1, 2021 7:49:34 GMT
left original,right reprint
left reprint,right original
On the reprints the shadow of the building on the left is much lighter than on the originals. The upper flag-pole is clearly visible.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Oct 2, 2021 12:48:46 GMT
left original,right reprint
left original,right reprint
On the reprint the most to the right awn is touching the frame. As that is not so easy to be seen,
so again the most sure distinction to spot the reprint,is the "A under the E".
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Oct 4, 2021 5:31:53 GMT
left original,right reprint
upper reprint,lower original (on top of the reprint)
The inscription "DRESDEN ZWINGER-AUFBAU" is thinner on the reprint.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Oct 5, 2021 8:26:23 GMT
When scanning for this thread,I found out,that I have no reprint of the 60 Pfg.-stamp.
Michel describes the difference,that on the reprints the rail of the ship does not touch the upper frame of the picture.
However the easy way is again the position of the "A" of DEMOKRATISCHE under the "HE" of DEUTSCHE on originals, while mid under the "E" on reprints.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Oct 7, 2021 9:11:31 GMT
left original,right reprint
left reprint,right original
The structures to the left of the driver are less prominent on the
reprints.Difficult to see,when obscured by a cancel.
upper original,lower reprint
So again the position of the "A" is the better option to differentiate.
|
|
salentin
Member
collecting Germany,where I live and about 20 more countries,half of them in Asia east of the Indus
Posts: 6,506
|
Post by salentin on Oct 8, 2021 12:57:48 GMT
left original,right reprint
left reprint,right original
The entrance and the windows of the building on the right are darker on the reprints.
Again the difference is not that striking,so once more,
the position of the "A" is the better option to differentiate.
|
|
]
