DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jun 15, 2024 2:13:28 GMT
Here's another one : Temuka 'T' cancel. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 8, 2024 7:47:33 GMT
Back to a manuscript on the NZ Chalons. This one came in today. 9X of 'Porirua' According to A.R Marshall : Porirua - opened 1 OC 1861 Manuscript possible in the full period of this office m/s known as early as 1869 This office renamed to Tawa Flat on 1 AP 1871 The m/s was identified from a letter. Dave
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 8, 2024 10:18:21 GMT
I do not have a lot of manuscript on Chalons and most of those are simple X. But one I do have still not able to identify so maybe someone has more ideas. The only thing I can come up with so far is maybe Onehunga as looks like One... something? I don't have Marshall so limited ref to manuscripts.
Clayton
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 9, 2024 7:43:19 GMT
Here is the m/s that Marshall shows for Onehunga : I don't believe yours is this one based on the comparison. I cannot see any m/s Marshall has under the 'O' manuscripts pictured that would fit to be honest. Hopefully one of the other Chalon collectors here has seen it before. Dave
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 9, 2024 8:57:54 GMT
Thanks, I hadn't seen any examples so just going off offices known to have had manuscripts and open in that period. Clearly not the same. Cheers Clayton
|
|
skid
Member
Posts: 394
What I collect: NZ Chalons, 1800's NZ, Thames Valley NZ, and other interesting NZ stamps
|
Post by skid on Jul 9, 2024 17:08:26 GMT
See this website for articles on Chalons.
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 20, 2024 3:39:18 GMT
as just looking here for more images of Maori Wars cancels. Good to see some nice examples. What I am hoping is that others have some of the "HEADQUARTERS" obliterator of 1864. Picked one up recently and on 1864 2d blue Imperf with NZ watermark too. Not clearest and only shows "QUARTERS"
Clayton
|
|
|
Post by tundrawolf on Jul 20, 2024 20:02:06 GMT
I have a couple of partials but here is as near to complete an example as you could get on a single stamp but it doesn't show as clearly on this 6d star watermark red-brown. Philip
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 20, 2024 23:33:38 GMT
Great, thanks. Seems they must have been light on using ink here, but still easy enough to make out the letters well especially as they are mostly on the light areas of the stamp. Almost all there, you'd have to be trying hard to get the whole thing on a stamp.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 21, 2024 0:12:49 GMT
I don't 'own' this cover but it sure is nice! I am not sure where I got this image from, possibly a Spink auction catalog, but nice clear 'Headquarters' cancels shown: and a couple of singles, found on the web: Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 21, 2024 3:18:41 GMT
While on the subject of 'The NZ Land Wars' of the 1860's, I took another look at this cover that we had questions over regarding the cancellation : I was wondering at the time we discussed it whether the cancel was an excised 'Headquarters' obliterator which had been used by the British Military at the Tauranga Base Camp during 1864-1866. After some closer examination I am of the opinion that it is actually a very worn example of the 'Queens Redoubt' obliterator. This obliterator was used by the British Military at the very forward base they used on the southern end of the Bombay Hills. It was then used in Pokeno Village following the Waikato Wars from 1865. I include here some observations I have made after using image sleuth on the image and comparing it with another used example on cover. NOTE that my cover is dated 1872 whereas the 6d brown imperf is on a cover dated 1864, so an 8yr age difference which would allow for further wear of the later covers cancellation. The ends of the obliterator are 'open', unlike the 'Headquarters' obliterator' which was closed ended. There appears to be remnants of the words 'Queens Redoubt'. Namely the 'N' of QUEE NS and the 'D' of RE DOUBT - shown annotated on the edited picture below. Also noted and circled is a very obvious broken upper frame of the obliterator, which until now, at least to me, was unknown! I think I remember reading somewhere (must track it down) that this obliterator is quite scarce used AFTER the British had finished with it! from 1865 or so after. Dave
|
|
|
Post by tundrawolf on Jul 21, 2024 9:03:40 GMT
Interesting sleuthing there Dave. The cancel on the cover is not very clear but the one thing that stands out to me is the shape of the oval. Measuring a few other images of the two cancels gives a width to length ratio of 1 to 1.3, or a little less, for the Headquarters cancel and 1 to 1.4, or a little more, for the Queens Redoubt cancel. In other words the Headquarters cancel is a little shorter proportional to width compared to the Queens Redoubt cancel and it seems to me that the cancel on the cover fits with the Headquarters proportions.
Philip
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 22, 2024 3:49:14 GMT
While on the subject of 'The NZ Land Wars' of the 1860's, I took another look at this cover that we had questions over regarding the cancellation : I was wondering at the time we discussed it whether the cancel was an excised 'Headquarters' obliterator which had been used by the British Military at the Tauranga Base Camp during 1864-1866. After some closer examination I am of the opinion that it is actually a very worn example of the 'Queens Redoubt' obliterator. This obliterator was used by the British Military at the very forward base they used on the southern end of the Bombay Hills. It was then used in Pokeno Village following the Waikato Wars from 1865. I include here some observations I have made after using image sleuth on the image and comparing it with another used example on cover. NOTE that my cover is dated 1872 whereas the 6d brown imperf is on a cover dated 1864, so an 8yr age difference which would allow for further wear of the later covers cancellation. The ends of the obliterator are 'open', unlike the 'Headquarters' obliterator' which was closed ended. There appears to be remnants of the words 'Queens Redoubt'. Namely the 'N' of QUEE NS and the 'D' of RE DOUBT - shown annotated on the edited picture below. Also noted and circled is a very obvious broken upper frame of the obliterator, which until now, at least to me, was unknown! I think I remember reading somewhere (must track it down) that this obliterator is quite scarce used AFTER the British had finished with it! from 1865 or so after. Dave Hi Dave, Certainly is an indistinct cancel. I won't posit a guess as to what it might be but at least does not seem to have had word completely excised as evidence of some letters there. Would be difficult to determine just what dimensions of cancel were too, especially as I think the stamp itself has been removed at some time and slightly repositioned when re attached. Aside from the slightly uncomfortable alignment of cancel on stamp and envelope there are other tell tale signs which would support this. At lower left of stamp an ink mark seems to be connected to the later inscription above address. This text was likely added after stamp first attached for postage. The stamp itself would have been placed slighty higher than where it currently is, so avoiding covering up too much of the addressee "Esq." but in doing so would have projected above the edge? Perhaps it had been folded over, it does not look like top edge of stamp worn or creased though. Is the envelope complete? Here is an image where I feel the stamp sits more comfortably but there are still some problems with this. You mentioned this cover had been discussed earlier so maybe I should see what came of that before suggesting too much more.
Clayton
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 22, 2024 8:21:25 GMT
Hi Clayton & Phil I agree that this is not a clear example of whichever cancel it is, but it is what it is. As to the dimensions of the cancel I believe that that will be a tough one as I believe that this obliterator is damaged, possibly or probably affecting its size and shape. I believe though that there are remnants of some letters left in the central portion of the cancel and that the frame around the cancel is open-ended, as per the 'Queen's Redoubt' one. There is a clear break in the top of the outer frame as I showed earlier above. The only other cancellation device that had a similar look to these two is the 'Coromandel' obliterator. Earlier we did discuss the positioning on the stamp in regards to the cancel and did consider the possibility that the stamp had been removed and put back in a slightly 'off' position to it's original place. I will get it out again in the coming days and see if anything further can be gleaned from this intact envelope. Either way, whether it is 'Headquarters' or 'Queen's Redoubt' (or 'Coromandel) it is an interesting piece. As an aside I think that this 2d Orange may be from the damaged portion of plate II from position 18/1. Any of you agree or disagree on that point? All three cancels side by side: (click on the image to enlarge it. BTW I have rotated the 2d orange 180 degrees as I believe that is the correct orientation of the cancel). Dave
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 22, 2024 10:26:10 GMT
I went back and found where you had discussed this earlier so saw that repositioning of stamp had already been considered. Also did a quick overlay with the Queens Redoubt image and although seeing the actual stamp would allow for greater certainty, the letters you highlight would appear to align exactly as too do some of the other features of the cancel you have. I don't know the history of the cancel itself and how long it was in use here but certainly the name was still in use in this period.
As to the personages mentioned, I am wondering if "Helen McGregor" is in fact the character from play "Rob Roy". It appears this play was doing the rounds in early 1870's showing at a number of theatres. Then again it was used for the name of a ship at the time too...
|
|
|
Post by tundrawolf on Jul 22, 2024 18:14:25 GMT
Here is another rare Maori Wars cancel. Philip
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 22, 2024 21:24:10 GMT
Here is another rare Maori Wars cancel. Philip Really. And what is the story behind this one, I am not familiar with it. Is it associated with a certain location, date and such? Also, what is it supposed to look like when complete? Looks like only three bars, or perhaps like that illustrated in PSoNZ Vol III. pg 85 (Unidentified #21)? I have this one, as yet unidentified. I always just figured was a partial cancel of something typical, but bars seem too widely spaced for most but not as wide as yours. Any thoughts welcome. 1872 2d Vermilion, No Wmk, P 12½. SG 138, CP A2t
Clayton
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jul 22, 2024 22:22:49 GMT
Brilliant Neil, many thanks It's amazing how sometimes we take for granted the description given on items we purchase. So, it now looks like Alexander Cairns ( Railway worker in Dunedin ) sent some kind of printed matter ( maybe a newspaper, we will never know ) to H C Mais ( Railway Engineer in Adelaide ) Gerald Ellott think it is a cut down wrapper. Still, I think a lovely item and will look nice on my exhibition page. Thanks all for the info. Great article in 'The New Zealand Stamp Collector' GC, Makes for great reading and nice to see the forum team add some value. Well done! Neil
|
|
|
Post by tundrawolf on Jul 23, 2024 1:15:28 GMT
Yes a good article gc, some great research. The Maori War cancel I posted above is the obliterator used at Maketu. Page 282 Vol 7 of the hand books. The other Maori Wars postmarks are the Province of Auckland series with original numbers from 1 to 7. Some were re-allocated to new locations with their original numbers from around late 1867 onwards, and latter still many had the index number changed or letters used. Location of use of many of these variations are unknown. Still a lot to be learned. Here are two of the rarer examples. Philip
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 23, 2024 8:01:31 GMT
I went back and found where you had discussed this earlier so saw that repositioning of stamp had already been considered. Also did a quick overlay with the Queens Redoubt image and although seeing the actual stamp would allow for greater certainty, the letters you highlight would appear to align exactly as too do some of the other features of the cancel you have. I don't know the history of the cancel itself and how long it was in use here but certainly the name was still in use in this period. As to the personages mentioned, I am wondering if "Helen McGregor" is in fact the character from play "Rob Roy". It appears this play was doing the rounds in early 1870's showing at a number of theatres. Then again it was used for the name of a ship at the time too... Thanks for that feedback Clayton. Very interesting. I shall see what else we can find out re Helen McGregor and 'Rob Roy' - the play. I wonder if a 'Kirkwood' is also mentioned in that play! Yes a good article gc, some great research. The Maori War cancel I posted above is the obliterator used at Maketu. Page 282 Vol 7 of the hand books. Philip And here for all who do not possess vol.7 of the RPSNZ handbooks I include the piece referenced by Philip : Also, I 3rd the congrats to gc for his good article in the latest 'New Zealand Stamp Collector'. Dave
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jul 24, 2024 7:40:10 GMT
Thanks everyone for the acknowledgement, but to be fair this was a team effort. Cheers Grant
|
|
|
Post by tundrawolf on Jul 29, 2024 7:31:50 GMT
Hoping other members on the forum can help me. Below is an example of a Southland district obliterator number 6 in circle of thin bars attributed to Riverton. Volume VII of the handbooks states "Present evidence implies that the special Southland obliterators....were supplied in 1861-2 to Invercargill and Riverton....and to a few other sub-offices". And "Obliterators of the distinctive Southland type so far noted are numbers 1, 5, 6 and 8, implying a series 1 to 8". Does anyone have examples of the 5 or 6 from the early period, Richardson or Davies imperf, or examples of any of the other numbers? Philip
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Jul 30, 2024 2:29:29 GMT
Hoping other members on the forum can help me. Below is an example of a Southland district obliterator number 6 in circle of thin bars attributed to Riverton. Volume VII of the handbooks states "Present evidence implies that the special Southland obliterators....were supplied in 1861-2 to Invercargill and Riverton....and to a few other sub-offices". And "Obliterators of the distinctive Southland type so far noted are numbers 1, 5, 6 and 8, implying a series 1 to 8". Does anyone have examples of the 5 or 6 from the early period, Richardson or Davies imperf, or examples of any of the other numbers? Philip Not sure if any help. Here are a couple of possibilities, unfortunately best images I can get as I no longer have either of these. Can't quite make out exactly what the 6d cancel is, may be a 5? This is on CP A5d Imperf Pelure paper The other one more likely a number 6. On 3d CP A3a Imperf Large Star Wmk. Sorry nothing from earlier period though.
Clayton
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jul 30, 2024 7:04:51 GMT
Hoping other members on the forum can help me. Below is an example of a Southland district obliterator number 6 in circle of thin bars attributed to Riverton. Volume VII of the handbooks states "Present evidence implies that the special Southland obliterators....were supplied in 1861-2 to Invercargill and Riverton....and to a few other sub-offices". And "Obliterators of the distinctive Southland type so far noted are numbers 1, 5, 6 and 8, implying a series 1 to 8". Does anyone have examples of the 5 or 6 from the early period, Richardson or Davies imperf, or examples of any of the other numbers? Philip Hi Philip Not a lot sorry, but here are the ones I do have Cover from Riverton to India with four SG74 perf 13 ) Single with "5"of Campbelltown ( officially renamed Bluff 1917 ) Single with "6"Riverton Cover from Timaru to Liverpool with large number "5" Single with "6" in square bars from Masterton Grant
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 30, 2024 8:53:53 GMT
Hi Philip I have these ones immediately to hand of the barred '5' of Invercargill & the barred '6' of Riverton. To date I have not seen any other number from this set of obliterators: Of course, these perforated ones of Davies are later than you'd like to see, so I will take a closer look thru' my books to see if I can find any on the later 'Richardsons' & early Davies imperfs from the 1861-62 period. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 30, 2024 9:26:37 GMT
I am still looking thru' my books, but have just seen this one. Not sure if it's the '5' of Invercargill as hard to tell. Maybe! - the bars in the obliterator look good tho' ! and here rotated via Image Sleuth: If it is the '5' of Invercargill then this stamp is from the 1862 - 64 period. I will continue looking. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jul 30, 2024 9:36:38 GMT
Last one for the night. SG69 Davies p13 1d carmine vermillion from 1863-64 - Looks like another '5' of Invercargill : Dave
|
|
|
Post by tundrawolf on Jul 31, 2024 19:06:35 GMT
Thanks Clayton, Grant and Dave for your examples.
Clayton the cancel on your 6d Pelure is indeed the Invercargill 5 so reasonably early.
Grant, an amazing Riverton to Calcutta cover. Was it overpaid or was there a 1s rate, and is it dated?
Dave, a good selection. I can't tell what the cancel is on the 6d. The fact that the numbers were often unclear is apparently one on the reasons this obliterator type was discontinued but both the 5 and the 6 were used through until the early SSF period.
The Riverton 6 seems to be more common than the Invercargill 5 which initially surprised me until I read that Riverton was a larger town in the early 1860's.
Any other numbers??
Philip
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Aug 1, 2024 5:52:36 GMT
Thanks Clayton, Grant and Dave for your examples. Clayton the cancel on your 6d Pelure is indeed the Invercargill 5 so reasonably early. Grant, an amazing Riverton to Calcutta cover. Was it overpaid or was there a 1s rate, and is it dated? Dave, a good selection. I can't tell what the cancel is on the 6d. The fact that the numbers were often unclear is apparently one on the reasons this obliterator type was discontinued but both the 5 and the 6 were used through until the early SSF period. The Riverton 6 seems to be more common than the Invercargill 5 which initially surprised me until I read that Riverton was a larger town in the early 1860's. Any other numbers?? Philip Hi Philip Yes, one of my "special" covers. Yes, 1/- was the correct 1/2oz rate to India at that time. Posted Riverton 16 February 1867, arrived India 28 March 1867 Grant
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Aug 2, 2024 22:51:13 GMT
The fact that the numbers were often unclear is apparently one on the reasons this obliterator type was discontinued but both the 5 and the 6 were used through until the early SSF period. The Riverton 6 seems to be more common than the Invercargill 5 which initially surprised me until I read that Riverton was a larger town in the early 1860's. The Riverton '6' was still in use thru' 1898 - 1915 at least, as shown here: I have a picture in my head that I have seen a 1920 'Victory' 1d also with this cancel! I cannot remember where tho', possibly on another board. Dave
|
|