DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 10, 2024 23:00:33 GMT
Got a small lot in recently of mainly 1898's. This nice pair of the FSF 3d was amongst them. Multiples of this stamp are not often seen. There was another pair of the 3d in the lot as well, but it had some damage to one unit. Dave
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 24, 2024 13:15:54 GMT
I was fortunate enough to purchase recently a full page of NZ FSF 1d lilac's. Approx. 46 of them on a page. Dated examples with the year of 1874 - the year of issue - are quite scarce. This page had about 3-4 examples, a couple in pairs! I also noted that they had annotated 'Inv wmks' as well so was more than happy to pay the NZ$90 for them (approx US$60). I was more than happy, and surprised, to find this one amongst them : Not only is the wmk inverted, but, it is also reversed - making this SG152y - cat £1000 I am a very happy chappie :-) Dave Some really nice finds there, Dave.
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 24, 2024 13:26:09 GMT
Nice to see the FSF items in this thread. Some very rare pieces featured.
I've been putting together a FSF exhibit over the past two years (not easy to do). I've documented it's development on Stampboards, so I won't repeat all of that here. However, I'll post a few pages and items to add to this interesting thread.
One area I am enjoying with the FSF is oblit cancels. Here are a few examples on the 2d:
RK
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 24, 2024 21:18:17 GMT
DaveSome really nice finds there, Dave. Hi Klem Just a friendly reminder that the reply to the quote needs to be outside of the quote box, otherwise it results in the above Just check in the preview before submitting. Nice to see you here contributing tho' lol Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 24, 2024 21:22:49 GMT
And what a great page of postmarks on those First Sideface issues.
I have a few of them, notably the 'Temuka Star' but mine are on Chalons. I hadn't seen one on an FSF issue before.
And I love the red cancellation of Marton as well. I have a nice red CDS of 'Wellington' on a Second Side face stamp somewhere. I must go look for it again.
And that Grahamstown duplex looks familiar. I wonder if I have one? Off to check it out.
Dave
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Mar 25, 2024 7:11:38 GMT
Got a small lot in recently of mainly 1898's. This nice pair of the FSF 3d was amongst them. Multiples of this stamp are not often seen. There was another pair of the 3d in the lot as well, but it had some damage to one unit. Dave Nice to see these as a pair. Do you think they were originally a block of 4 used or two pairs on same post? Same date and PM. Certainly looks as if the postmarks would match up if the damaged pair were above the other, but hard to tell if perfs would have aligned. Looks like a possibility.
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 25, 2024 8:26:25 GMT
And what a great page of postmarks on those First Sideface issues. I have a few of them, notably the 'Temuka Star' but mine are on Chalons. I hadn't seen one on an FSF issue before. And I love the red cancellation of Marton as well. I have a nice red CDS of 'Wellington' on a Second Side face stamp somewhere. I must go look for it again. And that Grahamstown duplex looks familiar. I wonder if I have one? Off to check it out. Dave Let me know if you do track down another Grahamstown oblit. There can't be too many of them around, I would think. I'm enjoying the marcophily aspect of the FSFs more and more.
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 25, 2024 8:42:20 GMT
Here's the FSF stamp that started it all for me, a SG158 (CP C1e) which I found in Stockholm. I'd only been collecting for a few months, so finding such a rarity was quite a thrill. Even more unlikely, I found a second example a few months later!
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 25, 2024 19:53:33 GMT
Do you think they were originally a block of 4 used or two pairs on same post? Same date and PM. Certainly looks as if the postmarks would match up if the damaged pair were above the other, but hard to tell if perfs would have aligned. Looks like a possibility. I definitely agree with you regards them having been a block of four. They line up pretty well in that configuration, don't they. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 25, 2024 19:58:11 GMT
Let me know if you do track down another Grahamstown oblit. That is my mission for the day Klem. It may be that I am thinking about skid (Mark's) thread on the Coromandel. We may have discussed them in there. Thames Valley & Coromandel threadBut I will certainly let you know if I manage to find one in my books. Dave
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 26, 2024 7:31:25 GMT
Posting another page of marcophily from my FSF write-up, this time some 4d examples, including some early use items. Tony Thackery has been a wonderful help in documenting and recording early use, which is I feel a somewhat under appreciated aspect of NZ collecting (though that likely doesn't apply to readers of this thread ). No doubt this may encourage FSF collectors to look through their 4ds for earlier examples, so I look forward to seeing them ...
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 18:58:36 GMT
Tony Thackery has been a wonderful help in documenting and recording early use, which is I feel a somewhat under appreciated aspect of NZ collecting (though that likely doesn't apply to readers of this thread ). No doubt this may encourage FSF collectors to look through their 4ds for earlier examples, so I look forward to seeing them ... I agree Klem. Early use is not only an important part of the history of the stamps, but it is also highly enjoyable in the quest to find the earliest examples. The FSF issues are officially recorded as having a release date of 2 Jan 1874. Any value with an 1874 datestamp on it is desirable, closer to 2 Jan 74 the better. I have a cover dated 25 Jan 74 from Alexandra to Wangarei (Whangarei) with an arrival datestamp of 28 Jan 74 . Quite an early one. As to the 4d, well, I have my books in front of me at the present time, so let's go looking! NB: I have Tony Thackerys book published in 2004 entitled ' New Zealand First Day & Early Use Covers & Stamps 1855 - 2003'. Do you know if there is a later one out? If there is then I have never seen it! Dave
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 26, 2024 19:30:26 GMT
Tony Thackery has been a wonderful help in documenting and recording early use, which is I feel a somewhat under appreciated aspect of NZ collecting (though that likely doesn't apply to readers of this thread ). No doubt this may encourage FSF collectors to look through their 4ds for earlier examples, so I look forward to seeing them ... I agree Klem. Early use is not only an important part of the history of the stamps, but it is also highly enjoyable in the quest to find the earliest examples. The FSF issues are officially recorded as having a release date of 2 Jan 1874. Any value with an 1874 datestamp on it is desirable, closer to 2 Jan 74 the better. I have a cover dated 25 Jan 74 from Alexandra to Wangarei (Whangarei) with an arrival datestamp of 28 Jan 74 . Quite an early one. As to the 4d, well, I have my books in front of me at the present time, so let's go looking! NB: I have Tony Thackerys book published in 2004 entitled ' New Zealand First Day & Early Use Covers & Stamps 1855 - 2003'. Do you know if there is a later one out? If there is then I have never seen it! Dave 25 Jan 74 is a good early date, particularly on cover. There is not currently a more recent edition of Tony's book. I'm very much hoping he produces one as he has continued to gather more data and has very interesting information not available elsewhere. But even his 2004 book - which is hard to come by - is a great resource. I have a few items of FSF early use, but nothing especially early on cover. Though I have one earlyish item pending confirmation with the RPSNZ. I purchased these 3d separately a couple of years ago; my first early use acquisitions.
Happy hunting! RK
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 19:33:21 GMT
I didn't find any 4d with an 1874 date unfortunately. But here is a small selection with interesting cancels: and my only multiple - a pair: And a couple of examples of the 4d showing the white vs blued paper: Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 19:49:48 GMT
Here is that early 2d cover: It is backstamped with an Auckland transit CDS of JA 24 74 - which must mean that the Alexandra datestamp is earlier - perhaps 21 Jan 74. I will have to get Retro Reveal to take a closer look!! Dave
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 26, 2024 19:54:44 GMT
Some fine examples of the 4d there, Dave. That's a great copy of the blued paper, and some nice oblits. Multiples are pretty scarce. I have no pairs of the 4d, but I did fork out for this strip when it came up on eBay last year:
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 26, 2024 19:57:22 GMT
Here is that early 2d cover: It is backstamped with an Auckland transit CDS of JA 24 74 - which must mean that the Alexandra datestamp is earlier - perhaps 21 Jan 74. I will have to get Retro Reveal to take a closer look!! Dave Very cool! Tony would no doubt list that if it's not already noted in his 2004 edition.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 20:08:43 GMT
Here are close-ups of all of the datestamps on the 2d cover above: First, the Alexandra datestamps - on the stamps themselves - JA 2x 74: To the left of the stamps: The Auckland transit CDS on the back of the cover - JA 24 74 : And the Wangarei arrival datestamp, also on the front of the cover - JAN x8 74 (presumably 28!) It is not very clear as to the Alexandra received datestamp on the stamps themselves. The postmark appears doubled! which isn't very helpful ... Off to Retro Reveal to take a closer look. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 20:41:04 GMT
Here are two versions of the datestamp from Retroreveal: The doubling of the strike isn't helpful at all! But, It must be earlier than the Auckland 'transit' mark of JA 24 74. We can see that it is a day starting with a 2 - therefore it must be one of 20 / 21 / 22 or 23. Auckland is a long way from Alexandra - @1000km perhaps! The cover would most likely have gone overland to Dunedin and then shipped to Auckland. I will see what Papers Past has to say about the mails from Alexandra to Dunedin around that time. Dave
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Mar 26, 2024 20:53:28 GMT
Here are close-ups of all of the datestamps on the 2d cover above: First, the Alexandra datestamps - on the stamps themselves - JA 2x 74: To the left of the stamps: The Auckland transit CDS on the back of the cover - JA 24 74 : And the Wangarei arrival datestamp, also on the front of the cover - JAN x8 74 (presumably 28!) It is not very clear as to the Alexandra received datestamp on the stamps themselves. The postmark appears doubled! which isn't very helpful ... Off to Retro Reveal to take a closer look. Dave Hi Dave, My thoughts and just a possibility as quite indistinct. Perhaps your Alexandra PM is JA 23 74. The second cancel (not on stamps) seems to show a clear curve after the "2" indicating a 3 or 5. With receiving cancel in Auckland on 24 this would have to be a "3" If sent from Alexandra on 23rd should only take a day to reach Auckland. Remember Alexandra was former name of Pirongia and so only south of Auckland in Hamilton area. Would have waited in Auckland to be sent to Whangarei. The doubling of PM on stamps means date hard to decipher. Regardless, a great early use on cover. Clayton
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 21:16:26 GMT
My thoughts and just a possibility as quite indistinct. Perhaps your Alexandra PM is JA 23 74. The second cancel (not on stamps) seems to show a clear curve after the "2" indicating a 3 or 5. With receiving cancel in Auckland on 24 this would have to be a "3" If sent from Alexandra on 23rd should only take a day to reach Auckland. Remember Alexandra was former name of Pirongia and so only south of Auckland in Hamilton area. Would have waited in Auckland to be sent to Whangarei. The doubling of PM on stamps means date hard to decipher. Regardless, a great early use on cover. Clayton I like your thinking Clayton, and also believe you are correct. Pirongia was briefly named Alexandra by the British (as they marched thru' the Waikato during the Land Wars in the 1860's). Ngaruawahia was also renamed Newcastle by them as well, only for about 10 years tho' before it reverted. I am looking at Wooders 'Closed Post Offices' book and see the dates for the 2 Alexandra's as being: Hamilton's Alexandra - Opened 24/08/1864 - Closed 10/05/1896 - Wooders rated 8 for its 'A' class CDS Otago's Alexandra - Opened 11/07/1865 - Closed 27/01/1867 Reopened - 01/01/1914 to present Therefore it cannot have been the Otago Alexandra!! Well done. I would go with the Alexandra now Pirongia and a datestamp of JA 23 74. Nice work team Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 21:49:57 GMT
Seeing as how we are on a 'roll' today - how about this cancel? I am currently browsing my library of NZ Philatelic reference books to see if I can find it listed. Perhaps it is an 'unallocated' cancel !? Dave
|
|
redkiwi
Member
Posts: 220
Member is Online
|
Post by redkiwi on Mar 26, 2024 21:55:58 GMT
Looks like one of those bits listed in PSoNZ as "unknown". I have a similar example, will post when I'm at my computer.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 22:01:56 GMT
Yes it does.
I have vol.3 of the RPSNZ handbooks in front of me and on page 85 fig.11 looks remarkedly similar. They show it standing upright whereas the one on the 2d above is lying horizontal.
It is in a section of the book entitled: Postal District Cancellations - Part 18. Unidentified.
Dave
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Mar 26, 2024 22:08:27 GMT
My thoughts and just a possibility as quite indistinct. Perhaps your Alexandra PM is JA 23 74. The second cancel (not on stamps) seems to show a clear curve after the "2" indicating a 3 or 5. With receiving cancel in Auckland on 24 this would have to be a "3" If sent from Alexandra on 23rd should only take a day to reach Auckland. Remember Alexandra was former name of Pirongia and so only south of Auckland in Hamilton area. Would have waited in Auckland to be sent to Whangarei. The doubling of PM on stamps means date hard to decipher. Regardless, a great early use on cover. Clayton I like your thinking Clayton, and also believe you are correct. Pirongia was briefly named Alexandra by the British (as they marched thru' the Waikato during the Land Wars in the 1860's). Ngaruawahia was also renamed Newcastle by them as well, only for about 10 years tho' before it reverted. I am looking at Wooders 'Closed Post Offices' book and see the dates for the 2 Alexandra's as being: Hamilton's Alexandra - Opened 24/08/1864 - Closed 10/05/1896 - Wooders rated 8 for its 'A' class CDS Otago's Alexandra - Opened 11/07/1865 - Closed 27/01/1867 Reopened - 01/01/1914 to present Therefore it cannot have been the Otago Alexandra!! Well done. I would go with the Alexandra now Pirongia and a datestamp of JA 23 74. Nice work team Dave Also Otago's Alexandra had only an Obliterator in the 65 to 67 period but did operate as a Tel office from '68 to '81. Unsure of what this Pmk looked like, but wasn't called Alexandra then. Obliterators were firstly number "24" in oval of bars and later "O 24". It was then known as Manuherikia so its first A class Pmk was with that name too. Then when Manuherikia was changed to Alexandra in 1881, because there was still an Alexandra in Hamilton it's new A class Pmk had name as Alexandra South (ALEXANDRA SH). These two ran alongside each other until 1896 when Alexandra in Hamilton became Pirongia, (another A class). Alexandra in Otago continued to keep the "South" for some time, with new A class (ALEXANDRA S) before reverting to Alexandra again, though no longer with an A class Pmk. It actually makes for an interesting page if examples of each are displayed. Clayton
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 22:17:29 GMT
I love our Postal History - well History in general really - but as it relates to the early colonial period.
A page showing the history of Manuherekia/Alexandra South/Alexandra would be cool to see. One I may look at a later date. I think I have examples of most of those key postmarks somewhere! lol
Dave
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Mar 26, 2024 22:26:11 GMT
Yes it does. I have vol.3 of the RPSNZ handbooks in front of me and on page 85 fig.11 looks remarkedly similar. They show it standing upright whereas the one on the 2d above is lying horizontal. It is in a section of the book entitled: Postal District Cancellations - Part 18. Unidentified. Dave I have this one, looks very much like No 19 on same page. Find these 'mute' cancels really interesting. Would love to see some on cover or even proving pieces for use. Sorry, realise it is not a FSF but an example of how these do not always quite match the illustrations or orientation thereof.
|
|
xacs
Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by xacs on Mar 26, 2024 22:31:29 GMT
Here then are a couple of FSF but with Manuscript cancels. I think the 1d may be Kohu Kohu but initials on 2d even if read as C W, near impossible to allocate. Any thoughts, I have little in the way of early Manuscripts especially on this issue. Lets see more.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 23:11:51 GMT
I have this one, looks very much like No 19 on same page. I love this cancel Clayton. It does look familiar too. I may have seen it on a revenue somewhere. Another job to go and find it lol Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,532
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Mar 26, 2024 23:19:49 GMT
Here then are a couple of FSF but with Manuscript cancels. I think the 1d may be Kohu Kohu I could go with that .... but initials on 2d even if read as C W, near impossible to allocate. Any thoughts I have looked thru' AR Marshalls book - "New Zealand Postal Manuscripts" and don't see it in there at all. So no go I'm afraid! Marshall's last paragraph in the above book does say: Unidentified Manuscripts"Some mention must be made of the very large numbers of manuscripts which are not identifiable with crosses, dates, letters, numbers etc as the postal cancellation. Many of these undoubtedly belong in APPENDEX 1 because they must represent Manuscript Cancellations from some of the very many post offices where manuscript is possible but from where no manuscript has yet been identified. Even when on cover this type of manuscript makes it virtually impossible to identify the office of origin although, if other markings are present these may narrow the choice to a particular Postal District".Dave
|
|