|
Post by nzgrant on Jan 15, 2024 21:12:33 GMT
I missed out on a Chalon bulk lot on EBay yesterday. One of the stamps looks to have a "Waipukurau" manuscript as shown. It is not listed in Marshall or PSNZ Vol III while Wooders has it as a "?". The date is hard to decipher.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 11,051
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
Member is Online
|
Post by rod222 on Jan 15, 2024 21:30:54 GMT
I missed out on a Chalon bulk lot on EBay yesterday. One of the stamps looks to have a "Waipukurau" manuscript as shown. It is not listed in Marshall or PSNZ Vol III while Wooders has it as a "?". The date is hard to decipher.
What would be the latest date used for Chalons? To me, the date looks like 7th April 1905, which seems far too late.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 15, 2024 22:31:05 GMT
What would be the latest date used for Chalons? To me, the date looks like 7th April 1905, which seems far too late. It looks like 20/6/62 or maybe 20/11/62 but I will let you see it when it arrives - sorry nzgrant Waipukurau opened 1 May 1859 Operates from a Paper Plus store today 77 Ruataniwha Street, Paper Plus Waipukurau, Waipukurau 4200 Wooders has a ? for the manuscript rating. Marshall states - 1 May 1859 Manuscript possible a. before FF1 datestamp - SE 19 64 (P) Date 2 JE 64 reported ?Error b. between FF1 & FF2 - AP 1 69 c. between FF2 & 'A' - MY 27 72 1 NO 79 d. between 'A' class - 4 AP 86 26 AP 86 It is a 'Richardson' printing as the back scan shows the no wmk thin, hard paper. SG9I bought that lot Grant purely for that m/s. Lovely isn't it. It will take about a month to arrive from the UK but will post it up with a clear scan of front and back once it turns up. PS Damn GST. I hate it. Ups the cost of purchase so much more than anticipated. Cost + shipping + gst x exchange rate = %&^^% At least some of it is recoverable by selling the excess stamps in the lot Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 15, 2024 22:32:52 GMT
FYI Paper Plus in Waipukurau today (2022 image) Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 15, 2024 22:48:27 GMT
From the traders own pics of it this is the best I can do to show the front & back of it. When it arrives I will do better ones. Dave
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jan 16, 2024 5:13:48 GMT
So about NZ$50 each or so with a premium on the scarcer ones - like the imperf 6d brown! Seems about right to my thinking too. Grant, you sold some of these on Trademe last year didnt you? How did those sales go? :-) Neil, did you participate in the 'Ken Lynch' sale by ACS last year? And if so, did you win many lots? I won about 10 items from memory :-) Dave Yes, I got quite a few of those.
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jan 16, 2024 22:29:45 GMT
From the traders own pics of it this is the best I can do to show the front & back of it. When it arrives I will do better ones. Dave Hey team, a rabbit hole if you will. I have a Postage Due collection. From my study on the subject prior to 1899 (1877-1899 in fact) they used a two docket system for collecting unpaid postage. The Postmaster collecting the unpaid postage would collect the money, put stamps on the pertinent half of the docket, sign his name across the stamps to cancel them (I have no proof but it is thought many signed their Post Office location because that was less confusing) and sent the docket with the stamps to the accountant at GPO Wellington, and got reimbursed for the stamps they used. The dockets are very rare. Question: Is it possible that some stamps in circulation today with manuscript 'cancellations' are from these dockets? The short answer has to be yes, but the likelihood is probably low given the bureaucratic accuracy of the system (and the people) in play at the time. However I find that quite an interesting proposition. The stamps are still being used for postage means but of course some represent the fines paid so could be defined as Revenue? When it can't be explained why a stamp is not cancelled by an obliterator because one was present but not used, could this be the reason? Bit of fun. Neil
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 0:13:27 GMT
Interesting one that Neil. I hadn't heard that before! My little knowledge relating to postage due, in terms of stamps for NZ postage due, relate to the 1899 thru' to 1939 sets. Of course prior to that postmasters would scribble on the front of the letter an amount now due + added (usually) a handstamp indicating a deficiency or similar. I have never heard of a docket system as you describe above. But if that were the case then the only way to collect those stamps would be on the original docket itself. Once a stamp was off the docket it could be deemed a manuscript use or a revenue use dependent on the markings on the stamp. Have you got a reference for your theory? Interesting anyways Dave
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jan 17, 2024 3:58:21 GMT
Interesting one that Neil. I hadn't heard that before! My little knowledge relating to postage due, in terms of stamps for NZ postage due, relate to the 1899 thru' to 1939 sets. Of course prior to that postmasters would scribble on the front of the letter an amount now due + added (usually) a handstamp indicating a deficiency or similar. I have never heard of a docket system as you describe above. But if that were the case then the only way to collect those stamps would be on the original docket itself. Once a stamp was off the docket it could be deemed a manuscript use or a revenue use dependent on the markings on the stamp. Have you got a reference for your theory? Interesting anyways Dave Page 492 of The Postage Stamps of NZ Vol 1 explains the docket system. Given that it operated for over 20 years the chances that some docket's stamps were recycled is possible - but it is just a theory I have - no proof. In fact it just occurred to me whilst I was reading this thread.
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jan 17, 2024 4:13:56 GMT
Speaking of new acquisitions I looked at this item for a long time and then thought yeah that will work in. Interesting that the Expert Committee certificate concluded that the 1/- is not rouletted at top - but this is crossed out by someone (which of course negates the certificate). Although I'm not challenging the initial judgement, it does look intriguing. Interesting (and if I'm honest one of the reasons I bought it) was that the stamp was submitted by one H. Gordon Kaye, Esq. and certificate dated 28 Jul 1948. One day this certificate might be more valuable than the item! Anyway I reckon any FFQ on piece from this period is awesome.
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jan 17, 2024 4:36:47 GMT
And this piece which I also just acquired. SG4 strip. Also appealed to me as it's ex. Mann & Silk, and the history appeals - but I love multiples from this period. From my research I've heard to was a strip of four but one was cut into and detracted from the strip, so they cut it off! Gutsy stuff. Interesting also that the scan, which is quite high quality, reduces the blueing effect considerably compared to looking at it in reality. Looks more like SG8.
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 6:20:25 GMT
Page 492 of The Postage Stamps of NZ Vol 1 explains the docket system. Given that it operated for over 20 years the chances that some docket's stamps were recycled is possible - but it is just a theory I have - no proof. In fact it just occurred to me whilst I was reading this thread. Righto. I only have vol.2, 3, 6 & 7 so havent read that part in Vol.1. It is available to read on the RPSNZ website tho' (for members only) so will read about it tomorrow. Cheers for that Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 6:23:23 GMT
Lovely strip of 3 of the 1d Red on blue paper - SG4 - there Neil.
That would have cost you a pretty penny or three !!
Just what we like to see on here.
Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 6:24:53 GMT
And nice to have an SG17 on piece too.
It does look like something is going on, on that top margin, doesn't it!
Well done
Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 6:51:07 GMT
Page 492 of The Postage Stamps of NZ Vol 1 explains the docket system. Given that it operated for over 20 years the chances that some docket's stamps were recycled is possible - but it is just a theory I have - no proof. In fact it just occurred to me whilst I was reading this thread. Righto. I only have vol.2, 3, 6 & 7 so havent read that part in Vol.1. It is available to read on the RPSNZ website tho' (for members only) so will read about it tomorrow. Cheers for that I just had a quick look at Vol.1 actually and it states in small part that : So this affects the period of the FSF, SSF & the beginning of the 1898 Pictorials. No Chalons should have been affected by this - therefore perhaps start a thread on the Postage Due story in NZ and I can supply screenshots of relevant parts of Vol.1 pertaining to this. Dave
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jan 17, 2024 16:59:40 GMT
I need some help Does anyone have a guess as to what plate position this is. This is not a trick, as I genuinely don't know. Regards Grant Hi Grant I have had a quick look into this question you have posed us. I took a copy of the image from the site and see you refer to it as ' SG114-pre-retouch-Row-16-No-10' I note that you feel that this is a copy from plate II before the damage occurred to the plate in 1866-67 ..... Looking at the reference points on the stamp, specifically the marks of ink in the lower margin, I have found on the Hausburg sheet just one stamp that has something resembling those marks. It is on a stamp in the position R18/6. See comparison pic below : On the Hausburg sheet the stamp 16/10 has no marks in the lower margin. The stamp in R18/6 has the one mark in the exact position still - between the W&O - in the lower margin. Noted that this example is quite worn by now and the 3 small dots to the bottom margin to the extreme left are no longer present on the worn & retouched example. What do you think? Dave Hi Dave Certainly looks similar doesn't it.'Looking through my copies, I do have an 1884 reprint pair ( Row 18, No's 5,6 ). But again not conclusive to say one way or another. Will leave this as unresolved for now. Cheers Grant
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jan 17, 2024 17:02:49 GMT
I missed out on a Chalon bulk lot on EBay yesterday. One of the stamps looks to have a "Waipukurau" manuscript as shown. It is not listed in Marshall or PSNZ Vol III while Wooders has it as a "?". The date is hard to decipher.
What would be the latest date used for Chalons? To me, the date looks like 7th April 1905, which seems far too late. Hi I do have this cover which is believed to be the latest dated Chalon cover. 26th September 1910 Cheers Grant
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jan 17, 2024 17:10:24 GMT
From the traders own pics of it this is the best I can do to show the front & back of it. When it arrives I will do better ones. Dave Hey team, a rabbit hole if you will. I have a Postage Due collection. From my study on the subject prior to 1899 (1877-1899 in fact) they used a two docket system for collecting unpaid postage. The Postmaster collecting the unpaid postage would collect the money, put stamps on the pertinent half of the docket, sign his name across the stamps to cancel them (I have no proof but it is thought many signed their Post Office location because that was less confusing) and sent the docket with the stamps to the accountant at GPO Wellington, and got reimbursed for the stamps they used. The dockets are very rare. Question: Is it possible that some stamps in circulation today with manuscript 'cancellations' are from these dockets? The short answer has to be yes, but the likelihood is probably low given the bureaucratic accuracy of the system (and the people) in play at the time. However I find that quite an interesting proposition. The stamps are still being used for postage means but of course some represent the fines paid so could be defined as Revenue? When it can't be explained why a stamp is not cancelled by an obliterator because one was present but not used, could this be the reason? Bit of fun. Neil Hi Neil, I do have a cover with a Waimate manuscript cancellation. It is believed it was carried overland to Russell where it went via steamer to Auckland. I also have this full receipt with Chalon attached, believed to be one of only two full receipts that have a Chalon attached. Cheers Grant
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 19:36:44 GMT
Nice Waimate m/s there Grant. Looking closely at it reminded me of one I have in my books that I wasn't 100% sure about, but side by side I think your one convinces me that my one is 'Waimate' as well. My SG39 Vs Grants SG38
Yours is a great copy Grant, and lovely on that cover. NB The Tizard's are quite famous in NZ political life here, and still are! Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 19:42:28 GMT
Certainly looks similar doesn't it.'Looking through my copies, I do have an 1884 reprint pair ( Row 18, No's 5,6 ). But again not conclusive to say one way or another. Will leave this as unresolved for now. Yes, it is a hard one, but, before I let it go here is your reprint pair with a small mark of ink still present in the right position all these years later. Severly weakened by this point tho'. Dave
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 17, 2024 19:50:17 GMT
All 3 examples together: Dave
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jan 17, 2024 23:57:16 GMT
Nice Waimate m/s there Grant. Looking closely at it reminded me of one I have in my books that I wasn't 100% sure about, but side by side I think your one convinces me that my one is 'Waimate' as well. My SG39 Vs Grants SG38
Yours is a great copy Grant, and lovely on that cover. NB The Tizard's are quite famous in NZ political life here, and still are! Dave Bob Tizard had one of the best Experimental Separations collections in NZ. I wonder what happened to them?
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jan 19, 2024 3:14:59 GMT
A recent arrival. A scarce route ( Dunedin to Adelaide ) A scarce rate ( 4d, using a single 4d yellow SG120 on star watermarked paper ) A scarce item ( Chalon stamps on printed matter are rare ) This is the description from the 2006 John Woolfe Postal History Auction 1870 (5 Aug.) printed matter front "pr Rangitoto" from Dunedin to Adelaide, bearing 4d. yellow neatly cancelled with "0" duplex and with G.P.O. Adelaide c.d.s. (18.8) c.d.s. additionally tying the adhesive, manuscript "printed matter from Alexander Caivill, Dunedin" at left, the reverse being a portion of a printed illustration. A rare destination and with Chalon Printed Matter items being very uncommon. R.P.S. Certificate (2006). Sc. 35; S.G. 120. PROVENANCE: John Woolfe, October 2006 Note: Book rates to Australian Colonies are seldom seen and charges are unclear. The "Rangitoto" was one of the ships subsidized by the New Zealand Government to connect with the P&O mail ships at Melbourne. She sailed from Dunedin via Bluff The item may have been cut down at some stage to fit an exhibition page, still a great piece. I'm still trying to prove if it is the correct rate. Proclamation 1 June 1867 says 4d up to and not exceeding 2 oz to Australia, with a possible change on 1 August 1870 ( that may not have been picked up on ) The Rangitoto left Dunedin on 5 August 1870 for Melbourne etc to the UK via Suez. Enjoy
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 11,051
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
Member is Online
|
Post by rod222 on Jan 19, 2024 5:19:04 GMT
A recent arrival. A scarce route ( Dunedin to Adelaide ) A scarce rate ( 4d, using a single 4d yellow SG120 on star watermarked paper ) A scarce item ( Chalon stamps on printed matter are rare ) This is the description from the 2006 John Woolfe Postal History Auction 1870 (5 Aug.) printed matter front "pr Rangitoto" from Dunedin to Adelaide, bearing 4d. yellow neatly cancelled with "0" duplex and with G.P.O. Adelaide c.d.s. (18.8) c.d.s. additionally tying the adhesive, manuscript "printed matter from Alexander Caivill, Dunedin" at left, the reverse being a portion of a printed illustration. A rare destination and with Chalon Printed Matter items being very uncommon. R.P.S. Certificate (2006). Sc. 35; S.G. 120. PROVENANCE: John Woolfe, October 2006 Note: Book rates to Australian Colonies are seldom seen and charges are unclear. The "Rangitoto" was one of the ships subsidized by the New Zealand Government to connect with the P&O mail ships at Melbourne. She sailed from Dunedin via Bluff The item may have been cut down at some stage to fit an exhibition page, still a great piece. I'm still trying to prove if it is the correct rate. Proclamation 1 June 1867 says 4d up to and not exceeding 1/2 oz to Australia, with a possible change on 1 August 1870 ( that may not have been picked up on ) The Rangitoto left Dunedin on 5 August 1870 for Melbourne etc to the UK via Suez. Enjoy gc Meet the Addressee............. (A Somerset lad)...beautiful Somerset. link
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jan 19, 2024 20:31:50 GMT
Many thanks Rod
A very dapper man, I must say
Cheers Grant
|
|
DK
Member
Posts: 1,542
What I collect: Classic NZ, Closed NZ Post Offices, New Zealand Postal History, Classic Br. Empire, Pacific Islands, France
|
Post by DK on Jan 19, 2024 21:38:13 GMT
Pondering this info, provided by Rod, on the addressee, Mr Mais Esq, I wonder about the connection between his occupation as a Civil Engineer and the drawing on the back of the envelope, of a suspension bridge somewhere in New Zealand. Perhaps he was advising on the construction of a bridge in Central Otago duing the 'Gold Rush' ! I wonder if he ever travelled to NZ to oversee some civil works? Anything is possible ....... Dave
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jan 19, 2024 21:53:29 GMT
Can anyone work out the name who sent the "printed matter" ? Someone thought Alexander Caivill, but I am not so sure.
Thanks Grant
|
|
neilmac
Member
Thanks for having me - glad to be here. Looking forward to learning more in 2024! Cheers!
Posts: 242
What I collect: NZ - especially FFQ, Pigeongrams and Postage Dues
|
Post by neilmac on Jan 19, 2024 23:21:23 GMT
Can anyone work out the name who sent the "printed matter" ? Someone thought Alexander Caivill, but I am not so sure.
Thanks Grant
Alexander Cairns? I looked at his writing and thought the 'r' of "printed matter" looked like it was repeated in his name after the 'I'. Cricket player and worked for the Railways! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Cairns_(cricketer)
|
|
gc
Member
Posts: 289
|
Post by gc on Jan 19, 2024 23:46:30 GMT
Brilliant Neil, many thanks
It's amazing how sometimes we take for granted the description given on items we purchase.
So, it now looks like Alexander Cairns ( Railway worker in Dunedin ) sent some kind of printed matter ( maybe a newspaper, we will never know ) to H C Mais ( Railway Engineer in Adelaide )
Gerald Ellott think it is a cut down wrapper.
Still, I think a lovely item and will look nice on my exhibition page.
Thanks all for the info.
|
|
rod222
Member
Posts: 11,051
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps, Ephemera and Catalogues
Member is Online
|
Post by rod222 on Jan 19, 2024 23:46:33 GMT
Pondering this info, provided by Rod, on the addressee, Mr Mais Esq, I wonder about the connection between his occupation as a Civil Engineer and the drawing on the back of the envelope, of a suspension bridge somewhere in New Zealand. Perhaps he was advising on the construction of a bridge in Central Otago duing the 'Gold Rush' ! I wonder if he ever travelled to NZ to oversee some civil works? Anything is possible ....... Dave That intrigued me as well. Never seen anything like it before.
|
|