firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Jan 13, 2019 14:19:22 GMT
Second attempt seemed to work although I'm not entirely sure how much it cost me.Says order completed so we'll see what arrives.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 15, 2019 6:44:36 GMT
A little bird told me someone needed some help with Semi-Postal IDs: A couple notes first: ID is before the stamp - Scott # on top & Isfila # on bottom. 4 stamps are missing: B24; B25; B27; & B30. B24 - I do not have this stamp. Lots of debate over it. Isfila doesn't list it. I've never seen one, and do not believe it exists. B27 - ?? Don't know why this one is missing - will check for it? Maybe I don't have it? B25 & B30 - I will post these 2 stamps separately.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 15, 2019 6:49:11 GMT
B25 - Isfila #594 B30 - Isfila #596
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Jan 15, 2019 9:00:56 GMT
A little bird told me someone needed some help with Semi-Postal IDs: Very nice posts, Michael, thanks for doing that! Hopefully, your well-labelled pages will help Frog ( firstfrog2013) to process his material a bit more easily. One of these days I will need to contend with my unsorted accumulation of Turkey, and now I will know right where to go for info when that time comes!
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 15, 2019 10:12:27 GMT
Sorry folks - my quality control on this project seems to have been lacking! B37 is also missing! So here it is - Scott B37 - Isfila 588:
|
|
firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Jan 15, 2019 14:46:29 GMT
Stuck on this one.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 15, 2019 15:44:10 GMT
Not a semi-postal. Regular stamp. Scott #364 - from 1916.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 15, 2019 15:47:25 GMT
'War' overprints - both 6-pointed stars from 1915 & 5-pointed stars from 1916 - have the date inside the crescent.
The semi-postals - War Orphans tax stamps - have the date above the crescent.
|
|
firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Jan 15, 2019 16:56:51 GMT
Stuck again.1905 issue with the war overprint and also discount overprint.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 15, 2019 17:04:32 GMT
Scott 316B - 1915 6-pointed star, with discount overprint.
You know you can post more than one stamp at a time, right? No extra charges apply!
|
|
firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Jan 15, 2019 19:06:20 GMT
These are the last of a whole page I had set aside.Couldn't locate these.
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Jan 15, 2019 20:16:39 GMT
These are the last of a whole page I had set aside.Couldn't locate these. The trick for me in finding the stamps with the ubiquitous "H. 1331 crescent and star" overprints is to locate the base stamp first. (H. stands for Hegira, the years in the Islamic calendar, the equivalent to the Christian A.D.). So let's start with the one on the left. The top overprint we find among the listings for newspaper stamps: So the base is YT #J19 from 1901. Then we look at the "H. 1331 overprint listings": Looking for the "timbres journaux de 1901 20 pa. rose", we find it as YT#229. The base of the middle stamp we find as the overprinted issue from 1892-99 (YT#89): Then, going back to the "H. 1331" overprint listings, we find "Timbres-poste de 1892-99, 5 pa. sur 10, vert" as YT#209. As for the stamp on the right, the overprint readily identifies it as YT#571 from 1917.
|
|
firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Jan 16, 2019 4:33:06 GMT
hrdoktorx Thanks for that information but Scott's is somewhat different.I'm not fluent in any language other than this so restricted by that. Between the small print and flipping from first pages to other spots in the catalog it becomes tiresome real quick.Add to that the distractions in my house and soon I just need to walk away for a bit and come back fresh. Yes I agree with finding the base stamp first but then trying to find the overprint with so many listed it is quite a chore.Would you know the Scott numbers by chance? I never did find the base stamp for the last one.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 16, 2019 6:29:49 GMT
Frog -
1st is a newspaper stamp - back of the book in catalog. Scott #P140
2nd - Scott #291
3rd - Semi-Postal - Scott # B47
To continue hrdoktorx's explanation:
Stamp #1 - base stamp is Scott 104 - foreign postage from 1901 series. Then, newspaper overprint applied - making it Scott P39. Finally, 5-pointed star overprint applied in 1916, making it Scott P140.
(hrdoktorx - don't know Y&T very well - but your YT229 is a 6-pointed star - this stamp has a 5-pointed star)
Stamp 2:
Started life as Scott #95. Surcharge applied in 1897, making it Scott 100. 6-pointed star applied in 1915, making it Scott 291.
Stamp 3:
It was a semi-postal to start with - Scott B46, from 1917. Then an additional surcharge - same year - making it B47. Make a note - B46 also had an additional surcharge applied in 1921 - see Scott #600.
So we've got a nice group of 3 here that explains alot about why this seems confusing: you've got stamps overprinted to make newspaper stamps. Stamps surcharged to create a new value. Newspaper stamps overprinted to make new newspaper stamps. Semi-postals surcharged to create new semi-postals. And for #600, semi-postals surcharged to create regular-use postage stamps. (This last one was during the transitional government period when the Ottoman Empire was in its last days...)
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Jan 16, 2019 6:33:06 GMT
hrdoktorx Thanks for that information but Scott's is somewhat different.I'm not fluent in any language other than this so restricted by that. Between the small print and flipping from first pages to other spots in the catalog it becomes tiresome real quick.Add to that the distractions in my house and soon I just need to walk away for a bit and come back fresh. Yes I agree with finding the base stamp first but then trying to find the overprint with so many listed it is quite a chore.Would you know the Scott numbers by chance? I never did find the base stamp for the last one. I keep forgetting that despite your avatar being a Canadian stamp and your name being firstfrog2013 , you live in the US, so I cannot expect you, like I would of a Canadian, to have at least some far-away memories of high school French. No worries. The stamps I could find in Scott as, from left to right: #P125, #291, and #B47. But I agree that without the clues from the YT catalog, it would be very hard to find them!
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Jan 16, 2019 6:42:44 GMT
Frog - 1st is a newspaper stamp - back of the book in catalog. Scott #P140 2nd - Scott #291 3rd - Semi-Postal - Scott # B47 To continue hrdoktorx's explanation: Stamp #1 - base stamp is Scott 104 - foreign postage from 1901 series. Then, newspaper overprint applied - making it Scott P39. Finally, 5-pointed star overprint applied in 1916, making it Scott P140. (hrdoktorx - don't know Y&T very well - but your YT229 is a 6-pointed star - this stamp has a 5-pointed star) Stamp 2: Started life as Scott #95. Surcharge applied in 1897, making it Scott 100. 6-pointed star applied in 1915, making it Scott 291. Stamp 3: It was a semi-postal to start with - Scott B46, from 1917. Then an additional surcharge - same year - making it B47. Make a note - B46 also had an additional surcharge applied in 1921 - see Scott #600. So we've got a nice group of 3 here that explains alot about why this seems confusing: you've got stamps overprinted to make newspaper stamps. Stamps surcharged to create a new value. Newspaper stamps overprinted to make new newspaper stamps. Semi-postals surcharged to create new semi-postals. And for #600, semi-postals surcharged to create regular-use postage stamps. (This last one was during the transitional government period when the Ottoman Empire was in its last days...) Sorry about the 5-point and 6-point star mistake. My bad. In that case, I concur. In modern editions of the YT catalogs, listings for overprinted stamps always include, in parentheses as part of the description, the number for the base stamp. For issues like these, that feature is an enormous time-saver!
|
|
hrdoktorx
Member
Posts: 7,213
What I collect: France (and French territories), Africa, Canada, USA, Germany, Guatemala, stamps about science, flags, maps, stamps on stamps...
|
Post by hrdoktorx on Jan 16, 2019 6:44:23 GMT
By the way, I also have an AFA catalog for Eastern Europe that includes Turkey, but it is in Danish, so even more difficult to decipher than French! But if anybody wants to know AFA numbers, I can find them too.
|
|
Beryllium Guy
Moderator
Posts: 5,908
What I collect: Worldwide Stamps 1840-1930
|
Post by Beryllium Guy on Jan 16, 2019 10:04:59 GMT
I just wanted to say thanks to Frog ( firstfrog2013 ), Michael ( mdroth ), and Xavier ( hrdoktorx ) for this interesting discussion and learning process. It is preparing me for my own eventual task of organizing my accumulation of classic stamps from Turkey. Just for my own education, I tried to find Frog's three stamps in his last question post on my own in Scott, thinking myself reasonably well-versed on using the Scott Catalogues, and I was only able to correctly identify one out of three within a reasonable amount of time. I was also tripped up by the five-pointed star versus the six-pointed one on the overprint, so that is a lesson for me to document here to refer back to when I will need it. Anyway, thanks to all of you for taking the time to walk through the process, from which we can all benefit.
|
|
firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Jan 16, 2019 15:47:34 GMT
I've been having more trouble cataloging in the last few years as my eyes either don't focus for extended periods or the dreaded blurring after an hour or so reading that catalog font. I used to catalog for Mom all the time on my visits there.one positive thing I can say about Unitrade is the pages are very white and the print stands out much better than my Scotts.They also seem to use a more distinct font. I can't wait to see how the Isfila looks.
Thanks to you all for the help.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on Jan 16, 2019 16:16:09 GMT
It's nice to see some folks interested in Turkey. And education is without question the goal! Scott is fine, but just not laid out very well for Turkey. You've got regular postage & then all of the back-of-the-book stuff. Once you know what to look for, it is actually very easy & Scott is an extremely useful tool. It is more than sufficient, in reality. Once you decide you want more, then Isfila is the way to go. I've used Isfila almost exclusively for many years, but in reality, I can pretty much ID from sight at this point. As crazy as that sounds, once you 'get' the basics of the country - primarily from 1862-1923 - it is really not that complicated. SO: Copying some notes & then some quick essentials: ** I actually keep series in my head - along with the SCOTT DESIGN #!! (For 1901-1913) Easiest thing for Turkey. Then, you can learn all the various overprints for each series - semi-postals; postage dues; & newspapers. In order: (each is 'series' name) 19th Century: Tughra (Scott 1-7) (Designs A1-A4) Duloz (Scott 8-52; 64-65) (Design A5) Empire (Scott 53-63; 66-91) (Design A7) Coat of Arms (Scott 95-100) (Designs A10-A14) 20th Century: Foreign Postage (Scott 102-109) (Design A16) Domestic Postage (Scott 110-117) (Design A17) 'Sun Rays' (Scott 118-127) (Design A18) **1908 Series (Scott 132-141) Design A19)** New Constitution (Scott 146-150) (Design A20) ** 1909 Series (Scott 151-160) (Design A21)** New Post Office (Scott 237-246) (Design A22) (Being able to easily distinguish A19 from A21 is critical!!) If you can get these 11 series, you're in great shape. The trick: these scott numbers above - are just for the main/basic stamp. Then: there are 'variations' - discount overprints (i.e. Scott 128-131); 6-pointed star overprints (1915) & 5-pointed star overprints (1916) (both with additional discount overprints); postage dues; semi-postals; & newspaper stamps. All from those same basic 11 series. Read more: thestampforum.boards.net/conversation/4382#ixzz5cmssy65w** So to cover two issues - one of which has clearly been an issue in the recent posts: 6-pointed star vs 5-pointed star: If you see one of these 'star' overprints, the very first thing you must do is check whether 6-pointed star or 5-pointed star!! This difference exists for both the War Overprints (regular postage) & the War Orphans Tax Semi-Postal stamps. 6-Pointed Stars: Regular Postage: Semi-Postal: 5-Pointed Stars: Regular Postage: Semi-Postal:
The 2nd critical issue is to distinguish between Scott design A19 & A21 - as noted above with the *** (!!!) Again - if you see either of the 1908 or 1909 series designs - first thing to do is determine A19 or A21: A19 - 1908 Series: A21 - 1909 Series:
Sorry for the long posts - but that should be alot to eliminate alot of confusion...
|
|
firstfrog2013
Member
Posts: 3,276
What I collect: BNA Liberia St Pierre U.S. Bolivia Turkey
|
Post by firstfrog2013 on Jan 22, 2019 13:50:50 GMT
Thought I'd post a progress report on my mission.I made it almost through the first collection last night.As I went along I pulled all the postal series off and re mounted them on my Stiener pages.I left all the semi postals,postage dues.air mails etc on the old pages and set those aside.I may make it into the second collection by tomorrow.I still have a large pile of loose stamps probably numbering 2-300.I estimate I'm at the 40% mark but that may be optimistic.
|
|
brightonpete
Departed
Rest in Peace
On a hike at Goodrich-Loomis
Posts: 5,110
|
Post by brightonpete on Mar 8, 2019 13:43:35 GMT
I don't think the lot of Turkey stamps I won in the weekend auction goes back that far. The picture showed the Cities definitives of 1958. Not sure how far back the lot goes, there are 250 or so stamps in it.
|
|
brightonpete
Departed
Rest in Peace
On a hike at Goodrich-Loomis
Posts: 5,110
|
Post by brightonpete on Apr 4, 2019 2:34:43 GMT
I just received the lot of Turkey today & on looking inside, they go back to 1860-1870's. So this thread will help immensely in trying to identify them all.
I thought I had a bunch of postage dues, small rectangular stamps, but not... It is a nice bunch of Turkish stamps to fiddle with though. But for tomorrow, as I am starting to nod off now!
|
|
abctoo
Member
Inactive
Posts: 150
|
Post by abctoo on May 1, 2019 5:43:53 GMT
Here are two 1914 engraved 5 para postage due stamps. Scott lists them as #J63. They are different sizes. One is taller and narrower than the other. The one shown on the left (or top) is about 22 x 25 mm while the other is 22.5 x 24.5 mm. Their mint condition is not the greatest and they have the lowest denomination. In the second scan I tried overlaying them so the difference in size is more apparent. Anybody have any information?
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on May 1, 2019 8:56:01 GMT
Normal plate/printing variations. Not exclusive to Turkish stamps. Not to mention over 100 yrs of environmental issues. Quality control & inferior materials in the printing process - at the height of WWI - were common...
|
|
abctoo
Member
Inactive
Posts: 150
|
Post by abctoo on May 1, 2019 13:28:40 GMT
These are the London prints and engraved stamps, not the local overprints nor lithographs. Were there two London prints?
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on May 1, 2019 14:27:33 GMT
?? (There's no overprint on your stamps???)
One printing - done in London by Bradbury, Wilkinson & Co. Released Feb 1, 1914. See prior post - London was not immune?!? Similar problems as everywhere else...
|
|
abctoo
Member
Inactive
Posts: 150
|
Post by abctoo on May 1, 2019 17:19:32 GMT
If one printing, is this then an unrecognized variety? There are similar variations in the stamps of other countries that Scott recognizes as a die variety.
|
|
|
Post by mdroth on May 1, 2019 18:25:08 GMT
Not sure what your goal is or what you're trying to accomplish here? It's a printing anomaly - very common - nothing more. Take any 2 identical stamps - even modern ones - and compare them under a microscope - and you'll find differences. Doesn't mean anything... Yes - it is an 'unrecognized variety' - because no catalog has recognized it as a variety. (Or collectors...) It is what we call an 'EFO' - Errors/Freaks/Oddities. Here's some more to look at - take a look at the variance in size - esp the last one in top row - and the 3rd from the end in top row as well:
Varieties have a wide definition - but common throughout is the fact that it is an 'unintended' change - usually substantive - in what the stamp was supposed to be. For example: These are (in order, left to right) Scott # 330a; 329a; 301b; & 334a. The 'variety' on three is an inverted overprint, as well as a 'double' overprint. If you think you have something that should be recognized as a legit variety, with its own unique Scott #, then the next step is to submit it to Scott for inclusion in future catalogs. My strong suggestion, in this case, is not to waste your time...
|
|
abctoo
Member
Inactive
Posts: 150
|
Post by abctoo on May 2, 2019 0:39:05 GMT
To mdroth: I like your posts and do really appreciate the knowledge you have about Turkish stamps. I followed your advice and started to look at the 100+ webpages of Turkish stamps listed on the other website. I see you started that listing in 2016 and were gracious enough to post your collection, with at least several customized pages per webpage. You do know your old stuff. The comments about varieties, printings and fakes (along with references to other sites with useful information) are an excellent guide to a topic that often drives collectors crazy trying to comprehend. I am working on the rest of the pages to understand. You even explained about the variations in the overprints for the few missing spots shown and will look to see if I can find anything to add.
To the other members, back to the two #J63 postage dues. I sure would appreciate it if any of you who have the Scotts #J63 or any of the other of the three stamps (Scotts #J64 - J66) in the 1914 London print postage due set would check them and post their dimensions. The design or image measurements here are about 22 mm x 25 mm for the one pictured on the left and about 22.5 mm x 24.5 mm for the one on the right. The information will helpful in determining if the variation is an aberration or a distinct variety.
|
|